Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

I mean, don't you find the inability to 'touch' the UI on external monitor jarring?  In my experience with the admittedly little desktop stuff I do on my RT, I've rarely needed the trackpad.  I imagine using using a Pro with an external display kind of forces you back to the mouse, compramising the Surface experience somewhat?

 

Not jarring at all.  I just shift to mouse on the 27" monitor vs touching it.  It is not jarring, just another method of getting there.   Input is Input in my world.  Mouse,  IBM erasure joystick (You would think i could remember what the actual part name is since I have done this so long), MAC Magic Mouse, Track Pads.  They are all just a means to an end.  No jolt or anything.   The "jaring" was before you could set the start screen to the same as the desktop background.  Once they became the same for me, it was just icons up, just as if I hit the LaunchPad in IOS. 

Not jarring at all.  I just shift to mouse on the 27" monitor vs touching it.  It is not jarring, just another method of getting there.   Input is Input in my world.  Mouse,  IBM erasure joystick (You would think i could remember what the actual part name is since I have done this so long), MAC Magic Mouse, Track Pads.  They are all just a means to an end.  No jolt or anything.   The "jaring" was before you could set the start screen to the same as the desktop background.  Once they became the same for me, it was just icons up, just as if I hit the LaunchPad in IOS. 

 

If your external monitor was touch-enabled, how much would you use your mouse?  Do you think you would grow to use it less?

 

After my brief experiences of SP3, I feel touch beginning to feel more obvious than going for the trackpad.

Couple things i notice with the UI.

 

Start Menu is now transparent

New Icons for Action menu

New icon for volume

New icons for settings app

 

Of course MS isn't going to show\focus on the UI, because its going to change.

I do hope they keep those folder icons, though, I like them.

If your external monitor was touch-enabled, how much would you use your mouse?  Do you think you would grow to use it less?

 

After my brief experiences of SP3, I feel touch beginning to feel more obvious than going for the trackpad.

 

Probably not, unless I was standing and demonstrating something.  Then I would use the touchscreen.  I am not very likely to bend over to reach a touchscreen in my normal setup.

Nothing seen or heard today of 'Metro 2.0', interactive tiles or any API/feature enhacements for Modern apps then?

 

Seems there was a lot not covered - when is the next 'discussion' event?

We don't know yet outside of build in late April, could they have talked about more? Sure they could've but I'm betting the key here was about universal apps, office and so on, more than the OS itself.

 

They did add things people asked for though, like being able to toggle the start menu full screen if you want.  Other little things should show up over time, GDC is in March and they said they'll talk about more Windows 10 gaming there.

is the search bar there forever or can you remove it.

the search bar is just the default. you can right click on the task bar and change it back to the button or disable it entirely

  • Like 1

Couple things i notice with the UI.

 

Start Menu is now transparent

Nice, for starters.

 

Things they still need to do:

  • throw out the tiles garbage from the start menu, it really doesn't belong there
  • re-add transparency to taskbar and window titlebars
  • fully customizable colors (not just taskbar and window titlebars) for all themes, not just High Contrast ones, because High Contrast has some nasty disadvantages (e.g. it breaks the display of web content in IE and Firefox)

Not sure if anybody posted this but "DirectX 12 will indeed be exclusive to Windows 10".

No surprise at all. Actually, I would be surprised if it was any other way.

Nice, for the benefit of Windows.

 

Things you want them to do:

  • unmodernize Windows, return to static icons!
  • give Windows distracting colors and effects that slow the system down and look ugly, especially how it mimics glass
  • a feature it already has, cutomizable colors?
No surprise at all. Actually, I would be surprised if it was any other way.

 

  • Like 3

return to static icons!

give Windows distracting colors and look ugly

a feature it already has, cutomizable colors?

  1. Your reading comprehension fails. I didn't say said anything at all about icons.
  2. "Distracting colors and looking ugly" is what Windows 8 presently does with that awful start screen, where the haphazard collection of colors has apparently been picked by a color-blind person.
  3. Actually, no. You're forced to turn on High Contrast if you want customizable colors, and High Contrast breaks stuff (e.g. web page display in IE and Firefox, as I already said). You cannot customize colors without High Contrast, only the color of the taskbar and the active Window titlebar can be changed.

Is Cortana like OSX Spotlight in where all request data is sent back to servers, even if you're searching for specific contents & things inside local files + folders? And is the voice search functionality crippled with no internet connection? (I would somewhat doubt it, Windows has decent voice recognition)

 

I also wonder if Microsoft are going to make a Cortana server for those companies who would like to integrate cortana somehow into their workflow but don't want to search data going to Microsoft. Probably not. 

  • Like 1

 

  1. Your reading comprehension fails. I didn't say said anything at all about icons.

 

What then do you expect to take the place of the tiles? Text?

I would like to see what they will do more with these tiles. These tiles look messy, I prefer static icon over them. And also live tiles is pointless because of notification center. I wonder if they are working on interactive live tiles now

Nice, for starters.

 

Things they still need to do:

  • throw out the tiles garbage from the start menu, it really doesn't belong there
  • re-add transparency to taskbar and window titlebars
  • fully customizable colors (not just taskbar and window titlebars) for all themes, not just High Contrast ones, because High Contrast has some nasty disadvantages (e.g. it breaks the display of web content in IE and Firefox)

No surprise at all. Actually, I would be surprised if it was any other way.

 

I'm fine with things like transparency, as long as they are options. I disliked that Win8 didn't allow you to turn off taskbar transparency unless you ran the Aero Lite theme. Why there wasn't a simple toggle, I don't know. Win10 can have transparency, or it can be opaque, just give us the damn option to decide for ourselves, Microsoft. And be consistent... If you're going to have a transparent taskbar, have transparent window chrome, too. Or be opaque system-wide.

Wow, I'm surprised that Pentium 3 and GeForce 256 of yours can even load Neowin.

 

How does a website (btw Neowin is very lightweight, are you suggesting it is graphics intensive?) even compare to rendering glass effects?? Most integrated graphics do not support Aero Glass. PS I know you are being sarcastic (hopefully?), but your analogy makes absolutely no sense to me, and I don't know if you are trying to attack me or are just disagreeing and thinking that Aero glass should return.

How does a website (btw Neowin is very lightweight, are you suggesting it is graphics intensive?) even compare to rendering glass effects?? Most integrated graphics do not support Aero Glass. PS I know you are being sarcastic (hopefully?), but your analogy makes absolutely no sense to me, and I don't know if you are trying to attack me or are just disagreeing and thinking that Aero glass should return.

 

Considering you present yourself as a Windows fan I would think you would at least be aware that IE was one of the first web browsers to utilise GPU acceleration. Websites can also utilise alpha transparency via the rgba() property.

 

Alpha transparency is incredibly cheap to compute, so much so that you could likely do it on the CPU without any issue. (And it probably has done before the other browsers added GPU acceleration)

 

Your statement that Aero's transparency could "slow a PC down" is utterly absurd.

Considering you present yourself as a Windows fan I would think you would at least be aware that IE was one of the first web browsers to utilise GPU acceleration. Websites can also utilise alpha transparency via the rgba() property.

 

Alpha transparency is incredibly cheap to compute, so much so that you could likely do it on the CPU without any issue. (And it probably has done before the other browsers added GPU acceleration)

 

Your statement that Aero's transparency could "slow a PC down" is utterly absurd.

Aero is not just alpha transparency.

 

Anyway, why are people obsessed with this? What difference does transparency make? It is nothing but a distraction. Simple UI let's you focus on what you are doing. You don't use a computer just to look at the UI, so as long as the UI is fast, snappy, and easy to navigate, it's fine. Metro does that perfectly. Metro is about the content, and letting the UI be as simple as possible to let everything else stand out. Transparency is a mess. It looks sloppy and distracts you with more content than you need.

Aero is not just alpha transparency.

 

Anyway, why are people obsessed with this? What difference does transparency make? It is nothing but a distraction. Simple UI let's you focus on what you are doing. You don't use a computer just to look at the UI, so as long as the UI is fast, snappy, and easy to navigate, it's fine. Metro does that perfectly. Metro is about the content, and letting the UI be as simple as possible to let everything else stand out. Transparency is a mess. It looks sloppy and distracts you with more content than you need.

 

Yes, you're right, it also has a screen-wide transparent texture overlay to give a glass effect which is still utterly infinitesimal in terms of computational power.

 

Are we done with the pathetically flimsy excuses to try and justify your aesthetic tastes now?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!