What are your biggest Windows 10 bugbears?


Recommended Posts

I just noticed the OneDrive status window that appears when you click on the tray icon is still the same buggy mess as in Win8.1. If the machine is busy when you click on the tray icon the status window no longer disappears until it crashes after you try to close it a few dozen times.

I just noticed the OneDrive status window that appears when you click on the tray icon is still the same buggy mess as in Win8.1. If the machine is busy when you click on the tray icon the status window no longer disappears until it crashes after you try to close it a few dozen times.

I've found that to be either another device is accessing OneDrive or it's stuck trying to process a directory that contains a lot of small files. It's annoying.

I've found that to be either another device is accessing OneDrive or it's stuck trying to process a directory that contains a lot of small files. It's annoying.

It could happen anytime the window doesn't open immediately, e.g. the machine was on for a while and part of the memory was swapped to disk or the CPU/disk is busy, and all this no matter what OneDrive is doing: I've seen this happen even with completely empty OneDrive folders.

Another annoyance is found is that the idle maintainance trashes the SSD a lot, I find at least 40GB of writes every day with the machine used so far basically just for web browsing. My user profile is still completely empty, there is nothing set to be indexed, the swap file is on another drive, the write cache is disabled for the SSD drive and Firefox is set to store all the cache in memory (disk cache is disabled), also if it was any of my activity causing the writes I would have noticed the counter increasing during my use as well, instead it seems to increase only when I'm not using the machine.

Edited by francescob

All of the non "under the hood" aspects of the OS. Windows 10 is not ready. Edge is not ready. Live tiles are broken. Task manager in tablet mode is broken (if I have two windows open, I close one in the task view it's going back to start screen, not the other app). core apps are broken (mail with outlook.com account hardly syncs, never notify). Battery life is worse than Windows 8.1. Modern Skype is missing. Touch browser is missing. Rotation of screen not working as it should sometimes. Screen scaling is horrible (fonts of modern apps are almost unreadable ("Nextgen Reader" for example) on my ASUS Vivo Note 8, with 8.1 it was great). OneDrive lacks features.

This is my experience with both of my devices (Tablet and Laptop), both after a clean install. I'll continue to use the OS and report bugs, but saying that Windows 10 is ready for prime time... no way. Maybe 5-6 months from today.

This is such a silly one, but the yellow smiley face in IE11 is really bugging me, looks out of place next to the other 3 icons and for some reason I'm finding it quite distracting at the moment.

  • 3 months later...

Unless I'm missing something, it appears as though the Start menu doesn't display all desktop applications. I've had to search for them. And then there is this:

Win10_Network.png

 

So I submitted feedback. requesting the above and got this with the new update.

*Claps hands*

Damn good effort Microsoft....damn good effort :rolleyes:

 

netsettings2.png

It would take them 2-3 more years to get their UI and features sorted out. 

But I hate the fact that they like to add irrelevant new features and glaringly ignore most rewuested ones.

Microsoft still wants to give us what they want to shove down our throats and not what we want. All we want is a consistent polished UI. 

But they just tweak their legacy UI to fake it to look like Modern one. Yes I am looking at you Mr. Context Menu.

  • 2 weeks later...

These are my bugbears, currently I'm using Windows 10 v1511, latest update. In no particular order:

 

- Calendar app live tile never shows the current date, or any other information, except when there's a memo attached to the date. 

- I can't add a Google account to Mail app or Calendar app or in the system Settings, I just get error code 0x8007042b as soon as I click "Google". 

- Mail app live tile get stuck on showing 1 unread message, even though there is no unread message.

- Anti-aliasing still sucks, text looks jagged normally and blurry if a live tile or button is pressed, e.g. in Settings.

- Photos app can't read any local image files, only files on OneDrive. 

- The tiny strip on the right when looking at all apps in Start Screen instead of being able to see all apps in one screen like in Windows 8.

- I miss the colorful tiles in Windows 8, now they're all monotone and boring.

- I miss the button in the lower right hand corner (Windows button) that was there in Windows 8.

- I wish the Notification Center could be accessed with a gesture like the Charms bar was in Windows 8.

- Start Screen in Windows 10 is inferior to Windows 8.1 for no good reason.

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, Atlantico said:

These are my bugbears, currently I'm using Windows 10 v1511, latest update. In no particular order:

 

- Calendar app live tile never shows the current date, or any other information, except when there's a memo attached to the date. 

- I can't add a Google account to Mail app or Calendar app or in the system Settings, I just get error code 0x8007042b as soon as I click "Google". 

- Mail app live tile get stuck on showing 1 unread message, even though there is no unread message.

- Anti-aliasing still sucks, text looks jagged normally and blurry if a live tile or button is pressed, e.g. in Settings.

- Photos app can't read any local image files, only files on OneDrive. 

- The tiny strip on the right when looking at all apps in Start Screen instead of being able to see all apps in one screen like in Windows 8.

- I miss the colorful tiles in Windows 8, now they're all monotone and boring.

- I miss the button in the lower right hand corner (Windows button) that was there in Windows 8.

- I wish the Notification Center could be accessed with a gesture like the Charms bar was in Windows 8.

- Start Screen in Windows 10 is inferior to Windows 8.1 for no good reason.

 

For your issues with Calendar, Mail, and Photos, try removing the apps and reinstalling from Store. You can find and remove apps using Get-AppXPackage *partofname* | Remove-AppXPackage.

 

I think Mail and Calendar come up with *windowscommu* and Photos can be just *photos*.

Ever since the 1115 update, I've been 100% happy. It runs great, looks great, and it brings many great new features that I use all the time (coming from Windows 7).

 

Oh, one small thingy: I wish I could leave the taskbar and Start black, and the accent color on windows colors. That would be cool.

3 hours ago, bluesman86 said:

Ever since the 1115 update, I've been 100% happy. It runs great, looks great, and it brings many great new features that I use all the time (coming from Windows 7).

 

Oh, one small thingy: I wish I could leave the taskbar and Start black, and the accent color on windows colors. That would be cool.

Agreed! Im at a loss why they dont have that feature.

 

My other bubear is the total lack of information of what update fixes/brings to W10 as a sys site admin i want to know dammit! :p 

On 11/14/2015, 6:36:47, AR556 said:

 

So I submitted feedback. requesting the above and got this with the new update.

*Claps hands*

Damn good effort Microsoft....damn good effort :rolleyes:

 

netsettings2.png

thats very wierd, i dont have that at all (on my desktop) but I get the same on laptop as you.

 

Desktop 

net.thumb.jpg.353789669601d64ef1bb70d7e9

 

Windows 10 10586.17 is an excellent OS. It has the options I had hoped for at release. Better 6 months late than never.

 

However my biggest bug bear is that while the OS is very good the modern apps are still total and utter ######. Edge is pathetic. Groove Music is horrible. Film & TV sucks compared to (free) alternatives. Phone Companion is basically just a program that links to store apps.

 

And yet we still have the old desktop programs for Paint and Notepad which could both be excellent modern apps. I think Microsoft just put their interns on the modern apps. If I wanted to use minimal/featureless and buggy apps I would use Gnome Shell. I expect much more from Microsoft tbh.

2 hours ago, kozukumi said:

Windows 10 10586.17 is an excellent OS. It has the options I had hoped for at release. Better 6 months late than never.

 

However my biggest bug bear is that while the OS is very good the modern apps are still total and utter ######. Edge is pathetic. Groove Music is horrible. Film & TV sucks compared to (free) alternatives. Phone Companion is basically just a program that links to store apps.

 

And yet we still have the old desktop programs for Paint and Notepad which could both be excellent modern apps. I think Microsoft just put their interns on the modern apps. If I wanted to use minimal/featureless and buggy apps I would use Gnome Shell. I expect much more from Microsoft tbh.

agreed! 

 

I'm beginning to wonder wtf MS are smoking, look at the mail client for example, outlook express from Win 9x era has more functionality than the modern mail app. This ain't the only app that seems less features = modern store apps, netflix app is the same, hell it doesn't even offer me HD as an option when the website does! like wtf! Ive stopped looking at all the modern apps supplied in the OS, it lets down the actual OS a lot.

27 minutes ago, Mando said:

agreed! 

 

I'm beginning to wonder wtf MS are smoking, look at the mail client for example, outlook express from Win 9x era has more functionality than the modern mail app. This ain't the only app that seems less features = modern store apps, netflix app is the same, hell it doesn't even offer me HD as an option when the website does! like wtf! Ive stopped looking at all the modern apps supplied in the OS, it lets down the actual OS a lot.

Yup. I understand the difficulties with things like Edge. I mean a browser and rendering engine is crazy difficult to develop however Microsoft have known IE sucks ass for years. YEARS! They have had almost an eternity in terms of tech years to work on a new browser and the best we can get after all these years is Edge?!

 

As for the other modern apps it is totally inexcusable the quality (or lack of) that we have in the Microsoft modern apps. They should be the very best to show off how awesome the new modern/universal app platform is. Sorry but if you want people to develop top quality universal apps then you need show off the platform with shiny amazing apps not pathetic mail disjointed messaging apps. They look awful, they perform pretty poorly on an average machine (I have an i7, 16GB RAM and an SSD so why the hell do some modern apps take several seconds to launch?).

 

Personally I feel Microsoft are still going to suffer in the OS market in the long run even with these amazing 120+ million installs already. It doesn't really matter if people are running Windows 10 if they are not taking advantage of the parts of the OS that make money such as the store and universal apps.

 

To be honest I am tired of trying to think positive about the future of Windows. It is clear on the phone it is totally dead and nothing can bring it back to life. On the tablet front it will do ok for full-computer tablets (Surface Pro) but it isn't going to compete with the iPad or the big Android tablet sellers. It is just doesn't have the apps people want and, lets be honest, most people hate the look and feel of live tiles. Even if they are better (personally I don't think so) than icons or widgets people just have that bad taste in their mouth from Windows 8.

 

On the desktop Windows will continue to do just fine in terms of users however the way OS makers make money from the OS has changed. People don't think they should pay for the OS. Why should they when iOS, OS X, Android and Chrome OS are all updated for free? (while on a supported platform).

 

In 3 years time how do you convince people who just bought a computer/tablet running Windows 10 that they should pay £100 to upgrade to Windows 11? This is the real dilemma for Microsoft in the long term. Microsoft wouldn't have seen anything near the 100+ million installs of Windows 10 if they had tried to charge for it. Will it remain free come next July? Time will tell although I wouldn't be surprised if it does.

 

Anyway I have written enough lol. I can't help but feel all the positive reviews of Windows 10 are only positive because they turned the start screen back into a menu and made it free. Almost everything else about Windows 10 is no better than Windows 7/8 (depending on which parts) or worse. If you are to just judge Windows 10 on the new (modern/universal) apps it is an awful release in my opinion.

  • Like 2

 

7 minutes ago, kozukumi said:

Yup. I understand the difficulties with things like Edge. I mean a browser and rendering engine is crazy difficult to develop however Microsoft have known IE sucks ass for years. YEARS! They have had almost an eternity in terms of tech years to work on a new browser and the best we can get after all these years is Edge?!

 

As for the other modern apps it is totally inexcusable the quality (or lack of) that we have in the Microsoft modern apps. They should be the very best to show off how awesome the new modern/universal app platform is. Sorry but if you want people to develop top quality universal apps then you need show off the platform with shiny amazing apps not pathetic mail disjointed messaging apps. They look awful, they perform pretty poorly on an average machine (I have an i7, 16GB RAM and an SSD so why the hell do some modern apps take several seconds to launch?).

 

Personally I feel Microsoft are still going to suffer in the OS market in the long run even with these amazing 120+ million installs already. It doesn't really matter if people are running Windows 10 if they are not taking advantage of the parts of the OS that make money such as the store and universal apps.

 

To be honest I am tired of trying to think positive about the future of Windows. It is clear on the phone it is totally dead and nothing can bring it back to life. On the tablet front it will do ok for full-computer tablets (Surface Pro) but it isn't going to compete with the iPad or the big Android tablet sellers. It is just doesn't have the apps people want and, lets be honest, most people hate the look and feel of live tiles. Even if they are better (personally I don't think so) than icons or widgets people just have that bad taste in their mouth from Windows 8.

 

On the desktop Windows will continue to do just fine in terms of users however the way OS makers make money from the OS has changed. People don't think they should pay for the OS. Why should they when iOS, OS X, Android and Chrome OS are all updated for free? (while on a supported platform).

 

In 3 years time how do you convince people who just bought a computer/tablet running Windows 10 that they should pay £100 to upgrade to Windows 11? This is the real dilemma for Microsoft in the long term. Microsoft wouldn't have seen anything near the 100+ million installs of Windows 10 if they had tried to charge for it. Will it remain free come next July? Time will tell although I wouldn't be surprised if it does.

 

Anyway I have written enough lol. I can't help but feel all the positive reviews of Windows 10 are only positive because they turned the start screen back into a menu and made it free. Almost everything else about Windows 10 is no better than Windows 7/8 (depending on which parts) or worse. If you are to just judge Windows 10 on the new (modern/universal) apps it is an awful release in my opinion.

I'm right there with you on that. Only reason i'm sticking with the reduced functionality is I am quite smitten with the frame rate boost DX12 is giving me with my aging 660ti SC 3Gb. Thats pretty much it tbh on my games desktop. Im glad it was a free upgrade, because right now, it ain't worth £5 never mind £90.

 

On my centrino based laptop, it looks nicer @1280x800 14" laptop screen than my desktop @1080p 27" monitor, are you for real MS?

 

MS need a kick up the arse IMO, shouting hey look we now allow YOU to have coloured active window frames isn't enough tbh.

 

We had that in Win 95, total inept clowns, they give some back and expect everyone to go wooo, look at that "new feature" i'm growing tired of them tbh :p 

19 minutes ago, Mando said:

 

I'm right there with you on that. Only reason i'm sticking with the reduced functionality is I am quite smitten with the frame rate boost DX12 is giving me with my aging 660ti SC 3Gb. Thats pretty much it tbh on my games desktop. Im glad it was a free upgrade, because right now, it ain't worth £5 never mind £90.

 

On my centrino based laptop, it looks nicer @1280x800 14" laptop screen than my desktop @1080p 27" monitor, are you for real MS?

 

MS need a kick up the arse IMO, shouting hey look we now allow YOU to have coloured active window frames isn't enough tbh.

 

We had that in Win 95, total inept clowns, they give some back and expect everyone to go wooo, look at that "new feature" i'm growing tired of them tbh :p 

I use it because of the 4 way window snapping and now in 1511 the 2 way split-resize. That is actually the only reason I prefer it lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!