How do you like windows 10


Recommended Posts

In a single word: Underwhelmed.

Cortana/Edge are not "killer" features for me (maybe for someone else), DirectX 12 won't be used widely for quite some time, and otherwise performance is largely the same as both 7 and 8.x.  Some Windows 8.x users may find the new start menu/interface and improvement, and others will find it to be a regression.  It doesn't help that Windows 10 hasn't exactly been the most stable release in recent times... after close to 20 years of using Windows, this is the first time I can remember the start menu crashing.

I'm also not very impressed by the "its the vendor's fault" when it comes to graphic drivers.  Microsoft has knew they were changing the driver model (likely for quite some time), and there are really only 3 vendors in the graphics space anymore (Intel/Nvidia/AMD)... how could they not manage to partner with them to have a stable set of drivers by release?  Its not like the olden days when they had S3, VIA, PowerVR, SiS, Matrox, 3DFX etc. to contend with as well...

AMD's Catalyst drivers are stable. I haven't had any issues with 15.7 or 15.7.1 and neither have my brothers. NVIDIA, on the other hand, dropped the ball with their mobile drivers.

In terms of stability, the only thing that crashed for me was the settings app.

  • Like 2

Been working good. Still feels a little rough around the edges here and there but no major issues. Hopefully they'll smooth things out over the next few months. Upgraded all my machines to it already without thinking about it much and haven't had any problems. I guess that says it all for me.

AMD's Catalyst drivers are stable. I haven't had any issues with 15.7 or 15.7.1 and neither have my brothers. NVIDIA, on the other hand, dropped the ball with their mobile drivers.

In terms of stability, the only thing that crashed for me was the settings app.

As it is with software, there are sure to be people that will have few/no issues... but the crux of the problem (and a very hard lesson Microsoft should have learned from Windows Vista) is that if a sizeable portion of your user base is having driver issues, they are going to blame the new version of Windows, not the graphics vendor.

Just out of curiosity have you checked your event logs?  Be it an upgrade, or a fresh install, or even spinning up a VM, mine look like a Christmas tree of failed executable and services after a few days.  The start menu in particular doesn't show up as a error message to the user... it just randomly stops responding from time to time and then magically comes back... in each case I can see where it has faulted in the event logs.

I did not like this spyware OS at all. I had turned off all the spyware settings but I was getting upset with MS removing all the useful features such as opening program in windows photo viewer rather than their default push for metro crap along with loss of control on updates and force feeding made me to wipe this POS from my system and revert back to windows 8.1 

You're seriously bitching that much and don't know how to change the default applications for pictures?

You are seriously out of loop if you think that  getting to change default picture viewer application is a matter of pressing button in default application setting in control panel.You need some registry hack in order to bring back classic picture viewer for majority of jpg files. Next time do research first before trying to show your ignorant attitude to the whole world. 

 

You are seriously out of loop if you think that  getting to change default picture viewer application is a matter of pressing button in default application setting in control panel.You need some registry hack  

Right click, open with, choose another app, select, always open with this app.

Oh god, the pain and struggle!

  • Like 3

In a single word: Underwhelmed.

Cortana/Edge are not "killer" features for me (maybe for someone else), DirectX 12 won't be used widely for quite some time, and otherwise performance is largely the same as both 7 and 8.x.  Some Windows 8.x users may find the new start menu/interface and improvement, and others will find it to be a regression.  It doesn't help that Windows 10 hasn't exactly been the most stable release in recent times... after close to 20 years of using Windows, this is the first time I can remember the start menu crashing.

I'm also not very impressed by the "its the vendor's fault" when it comes to graphic drivers.  Microsoft has knew they were changing the driver model (likely for quite some time), and there are really only 3 vendors in the graphics space anymore (Intel/Nvidia/AMD)... how could they not manage to partner with them to have a stable set of drivers by release?  Its not like the olden days when they had S3, VIA, PowerVR, SiS, Matrox, 3DFX etc. to contend with as well...

Microsoft doesn't build the drivers and OEMs knew for at least a year there would be a new driver model.

 

As it is with software, there are sure to be people that will have few/no issues... but the crux of the problem (and a very hard lesson Microsoft should have learned from Windows Vista) is that if a sizeable portion of your user base is having driver issues, they are going to blame the new version of Windows, not the graphics vendor.

Just out of curiosity have you checked your event logs?  Be it an upgrade, or a fresh install, or even spinning up a VM, mine look like a Christmas tree of failed executable and services after a few days.  The start menu in particular doesn't show up as a error message to the user... it just randomly stops responding from time to time and then magically comes back... in each case I can see where it has faulted in the event logs.

I know you asked Yusuf, but my Event Viewer is pretty clean considering.  Out of 200 info logs (eyeballing it), I'll see a few errors and a dozen warnings.  Most of my errors are from Office 2016, which doesn't surprise me.

I know you asked Yusuf, but my Event Viewer is pretty clean considering.  Out of 200 info logs (eyeballing it), I'll see a few errors and a dozen warnings.  Most of my errors are from Office 2016, which doesn't surprise me.

Well that is interesting to hear... then perhaps something in my GPO's or other baseline configuration items is causing issues that weren't tested for, since I have consistently see the same results on every install (though I have not spent significant time validating if this changes after the last "cumulative" patch.)

Microsoft doesn't build the drivers and OEMs knew for at least a year there would be a new driver model.

Indeed, but if the problems were known to still be an issue, why did it release anyway (hence repeating what ailed Vista), and if they weren't known, that is a massive QA failure. Microsoft may not write them, but how well the drivers perform (or badly in this case) definitely influences opinion regarding the OS.  "Joe User" doesn't read the blue-screen message to identify the culprit is nvlddmkm.sys (or whatever vendor provided code is involved), he just cares that his newly upgrade Windows crashed when it wasn't before.

That said, this pattern dates back even before Vista...those that remember the NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 transition can attest to that... but in that case 2000 was really not aimed at "home user" market.  I don't recall if the 2000 to XP transition had similar issues, mainly because 2000 was so solid at that point, I didn't migrate until XP SP3.

 

Well that is interesting to hear... then perhaps something in my GPO's or other baseline configuration items is causing issues that weren't tested for, since I have consistently see the same results on every install (though I have not spent significant time validating if this changes after the last "cumulative" patch.)

 

Indeed, but if the problems were known to still be an issue, why did it release anyway (hence repeating what ailed Vista), and if they weren't known, that is a massive QA failure. Microsoft may not write them, but how well the drivers perform (or badly in this case) definitely influences opinion regarding the OS.  "Joe User" doesn't read the blue-screen message to identify the culprit is nvlddmkm.sys (or whatever vendor provided code is involved), he just cares that his newly upgrade Windows crashed when it wasn't before.

That said, this pattern dates back even before Vista...those that remember the NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 transition can attest to that... but in that case 2000 was really not aimed at "home user" market.  I don't recall if the 2000 to XP transition had similar issues, mainly because 2000 was so solid at that point, I didn't migrate until XP SP3.

Regarding event viewer, did you upgrade or clean install?  I clean installed retail Pro.

As for drivers..I dunno. That is a good question. It could have been false promises on the OEM's part, or false reassurances...I just don't know. I myself had none of the mentioned Nvidia issues, and my wife and daughter had none of the AMD issues. So...maybe its card specific. Perhaps ones that were not thoroughly tested.

I like it.  I think it can be a bit sluggish compared to 8.1 at random times, specially boot.  I have a Spectre x360 and I love all the tablet features it has when in tablet mode. 

Did you upgrade?  I find 10 faster on my x360 but I clean installed.

Right click, open with, choose another app, select, always open with this app.

Oh god, the pain and struggle!

Dude... did you really even installed windows 10 or just pulling out BS from no where. There is no option to choose pick classic picture viewer in your right click option. For your convenience I researched you the link to actually change the default picture viewer. 

http://www.askvg.com/tip-restoring-windows-photo-viewer-as-default-in-windows-10/

Dude... did you really even installed windows 10 or just pulling out BS from no where. There is no option to choose pick classic picture viewer in your right click option. For your convenience I researched you the link to actually change the default picture viewer. 

Dude. I think my install is corrupted. I'll call MS to have it removed.

orlly.jpg

best windows release so far.

It is interesting how many of these inane posts there are on this thread, as if most people who say they like W10 don't have the first idea why.

It is interesting how many of these inane posts there are on this thread, as if most people who say they like W10 don't have the first idea why.

My guess is they got a little overexcited by the Return Of The Start Menu.

Personally I don't see anything revolutionary or groundbreaking in W10. MS should have numbered it 8.1.1 or something similar.

My guess is they got a little overexcited by the Return Of The Start Menu.

Personally I don't see anything revolutionary or groundbreaking in W10. MS should have numbered it 8.1.1 or something similar.

I upgraded mostly for the new snapping features which are great. I don't care a whole lot about much else tbh. I don't care for Cortana, I never liked Siri on my phone except for a few gimmicky things. Edge shows promise but needs a lot of work. The new media apps are meh. They should be much better imho. The action centre is very limp still.

You are not wrong in saying it doesn't feel like a massive update. With the whole "Windows 10 because it is such a huge change" it feels kind of meh.

I love it. A solid and speedy upgrade over 8.1. I can't wait for every coming update. I would pay for this to be sure. Any problems I have are small to the point of me sounding nit picky, though I see some people have no problem over-voicing them.

"Speedy" how? All the benchmarks I've seen point to it being almost exactly the same as Windows 8, as in a few percent faster in some benchmarks and the same in others. It certainly doesn't feel any faster to me.

Dude. I think my install is corrupted. I'll call MS to have it removed.

orlly.jpg

Its only available on upgraded installs. Clean installs are sadly out of luck, unless they use third party tools to restore the Photo Viewer.

Unrelated: Hiding your sloth collection? :o

 

 

Its only available on upgraded installs. Clean installs are sadly out of luck, unless they use third party tools to restore the Photo Viewer.

Unrelated: Hiding your sloth collection? :o

 

 

I'm not on an upgraded install. Note the checkbox.

 

Capture15.PNG

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!