Has Windows 10 redeemed Microsoft?


Recommended Posts

What else would Windows Phone run? Kludgy, x86 desktop apps? Gotta love those file menus, ammirite?

 

I know you're trying extra hard to miss the point, so I'll repeat it just one more time: the poor adoption of Windows phone is direct evidence of people's dislike of the metro UI and metro apps.

 

I know you're trying extra hard to miss the point, so I'll repeat it just one more time: the poor adoption of Windows phone is direct evidence of people's dislike of the metro UI and metro apps.

No it isn't.

Windows Phone is barely marketed, has a serious app gapp and carriers refuse to push it.

Most people have never seen it up close, much less used it.

Right, that must be it. Windows 8 didn't fail because of metro, and Windows phone isn't unpopular because of metro. It's just a coincidence that both products have major metro integration and have flopped.

Interesting read summing up some (not all) issues with 10 http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/windows-10-turning-me-back-windows-7-user

I particularly agree with "From a touchscreen perspective, Windows 10 is a step backward."

 

It has a pseudo start menu which most sane people hate vehemently and require Classic Shell to be installed immediately.

And I assume you have conducted some nice user studies to confirm such a claim?

 

Tell me how Windows 10 start menu is ANY better than Windows 7 start menu. Tell me how TWO control panels (where one of them has completely broken text antialiasing) are better than one. Tell me how plain idiotic 8bit colors are better than the rich palette of Windows 7 which had amazing icons, beautiful translucency and configurability.

Well, for me, I like having the live tiles in the Start menu. I have it set up so it shows me new e-mail, local weather, local sports and news updates. In addition, I can still type what I'm looking for. So, therefore, the Windows 10 Start menu is better than the Windows 7 Start menu. Again, for me, I don't speak for everyone (nor do you).

Windows 10 has the same number of colors as Windows 7. The UI may be using them differently but in no way are you limited to the "idiotic 8-bit colors." As for beautiful icons and translucency, that's purely subjective and a matter of opinion and shouldn't objectively used to compare the two OS. I, for one, did not like several elements of the Win7 UI. I generally prefer the Win10 UI based on several factors. But neither have been very good in terms of consistency, I still think Win2000 is the best Windows has ever looked purely from a consistent look and feel.

What else would Windows Phone run? Kludgy, x86 desktop apps? Gotta love those file menus, ammirite?

Perhaps it should. I have no interest in tablets specifically because they run a crippled OS that can't run most of the day-to-day software that I like to use. The reason I'm actually considering getting a Surface 3 Pro is because it runs the full Win10 OS. Granted, I can accept something like Windows Mobile on a smartphone, but the lack of those "kludgy, x86 desktop apps" is one of the big reasons WinRT hasn't taken off.

In my opinion, no. Windows 10 is amazing, but Microsoft put too many Privacy Violations in there. I'm beginning to think that Ubuntu + Wine is better than Windows itself. Windows 10 feels NSA Friendly to me :p

Ubuntu actually got into some hot water a while back with its Launchpad software calling home and to various Internet servers, much like Win10. I think this increased lack of privacy is, unfortunately, something that all OS are going to fall victim to.

Ubuntu actually got into some hot water a while back with its Launchpad software calling home and to various Internet servers, much like Win10. I think this increased lack of privacy is, unfortunately, something that all OS are going to fall victim to.

Oh really? I didn't know that. Thanks for that tidbit, what release version was it, do you remember?

Oh really? I didn't know that. Thanks for that tidbit, what release version was it, do you remember?

Well, it's been in every Ubuntu release since they introduced Launchpad. A couple years back, at least. Although in the most recent versions, they changed things up so you can at least turn off Internet search results, etc. Which is what you can do in Win10, but apparently it still calls home.

Right, that must be it. Windows 8 didn't fail because of metro, and Windows phone isn't unpopular because of metro. It's just a coincidence that both products have major metro integration and have flopped.

Show some evidence of otherwise then instead of making assumptions pulled from your posterior.

 

Should I use your logic to explain why GNU/Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop?

 

Should I use your logic to explain why GNU/Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop?

 

Go on?..

Windows has a user base already where as linux doesn't... But most people like Linux on phones and tablets, so I would say it's actually doing pretty well, definitely beating Windows Phone.

Go on?..

Windows has a user base already where as linux doesn't... But most people like Linux on phones and tablets, so I would say it's actually doing pretty well, definitely beating Windows Phone.

 

I think you misinterpreted what I was saying. I am in no way bashing GNU/Linux, but clearly one could say the user interface scares people off from it, just like the silly assumption about Windows Phone. Am I claiming that? Of course not.

Also, Android has a Linux kernel. It is NOT GNU/Linux, and is a mostly Java OS, which GNU/Linux clearly is not. A kernel may run the OS, but it does not define the OS.

Show some evidence of otherwise then instead of making assumptions pulled from your posterior.

Should I use your logic to explain why GNU/Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop?

Firstly, why don't YOU take your own advice and show some evidence that Windows phone is failing because of "lack of marketing" :)

Secondly, how about I use your logic instead and claim that Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop because of lack of marketing. I mean, when was the last time you saw a Linux ad, right? So that must be it.

Instead of making up fantasy scenarios, pulled from your own posterior as you put it, maybe it's time for you to accept the possibility that Windows desktop users don't like a mobile-centric UI (metro) and mobile-centric apps on their desktop, based on the logical principle of Occam's Razor.

Firstly, why don't YOU take your own advice and show some evidence that Windows phone is failing because of "lack of marketing" :)

Secondly, how about I use your logic instead and claim that Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop because of lack of marketing. I mean, when was the last time you saw a Linux ad, right? So that must be it.

Instead of making up fantasy scenarios, pulled from your own posterior as you put it, maybe it's time for you to accept the possibility that Windows desktop users don't like a mobile-centric UI (metro) and mobile-centric apps on their desktop, based on the logical principle of Occam's Razor.

It doesn't work that way. The one who makes the claim has the responsibility of backing it up.

Or not, and then we don't take you seriously, like now.

Take any of the three new windows 10 apps, like the calculator, the timer and lets say mail, resize their windows, place them on a 2nd monitor, etc.  Now close them all, and I bet you at least two of them don't remember their size and monitor placement.  So utterly unacceptable Microsoft...just careless.

 

Take any of the three new windows 10 apps, like the calculator, the timer and lets say mail, resize their windows, place them on a 2nd monitor, etc.  Now close them all, and I bet you at least two of them don't remember their size and monitor placement.  So utterly unacceptable Microsoft...just careless.

Mail and Calendar are ok. Calc and the Timer app do not remember size or position, though they do remember their "mode".

Not happy that I can't tell Cortana "Set a timer for 57 seconds". Am pleased that the input field is able to do simple math operations.

Mail and Calendar are ok. Calc and the Timer app do not remember size or position, though they do remember their "mode".

Not happy that I can't tell Cortana "Set a timer for 57 seconds". Am pleased that the input field is able to do simple math operations.

Yeah there are still a LOT of small touches for them to fix up, which I hope they do...  It should not have been released until all this minor stuff was fixed imo.

 

Yep, the article covers my oft-repeated, but stubbornly and deliberately ignored common-sense points. Like Brad Wardell of Stardock regarding gimped apps:

"In the end, you get a mobile app running on your desktop without all of the features you probably wanted in the first place...I want to build real stuff, and I can’t build real stuff on that API"

The mobile/desktop divide is important to understand, Wardell says. “Apple understands that Mac OS is a different beast than iOS"
 

 The article nails it with this:

Universal Apps are simply a last ditch Hail Mary effort to make Microsoft relevant in mobile.. over the long run, it means that developers will gradually find less and less reason to build for Microsoft’s platforms at all. As iOS and Android apps get better and better, and iOS and Android tablets become closer and closer to replacing PCs, Windows will continue to lose relevance.

Basically, Microsoft is diluting its desktop OS, the one thing it does better than any other vendor, to undertake a clumsy, and extremely late "me too" chase for the mobile dollar - and failing at that. If you do something well, don't turn around and completely bastardize it just to try to do something else not so well.

Go on?..

Windows has a user base already where as linux doesn't... But most people like Linux on phones and tablets, so I would say it's actually doing pretty well, definitely beating Windows Phone.

 

Surely the same can be claimed of Windows Phone and Windows RT as a smartphone/tablet OS - both Android and iOS had established user bases, making it very difficult (if not impossible) for Windows Phone and RT to break into the phone and tablet, having been late to the party (as desktop Linux was).

I have never met a single person who doesn't use Windows Phone because they disliked the UX (in fact quite the opposite) or the first party apps.  Their complaint has always been the availability of 3rd Party Apps and their quality. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!