Has Windows 10 redeemed Microsoft?


Recommended Posts

Right, that must be it. Windows 8 didn't fail because of metro, and Windows phone isn't unpopular because of metro. It's just a coincidence that both products have major metro integration and have flopped.

The reason Windows Phone isn't more popular has nothing to do with it's user interface. The reason is that almost everyone is already using an android or iOS powered system.

MS just has missed the bus to the mobile mass market.

The reason Windows Phone isn't more popular has nothing to do with it's user interface. The reason is that almost everyone is already using an android or iOS powered system.

MS just has missed the bus to the mobile mass market.

 

That is only one of multiple reasons why Windows Phone never took off and probably never will. IMHO reasons for that were these in no particular order: OS licensing (when first released Windows Phone was not free), OS restrictions for phone vendors unlike with Android, When released it was a sad excuse for OS (lacking multitasking, file system even basic functions like copy/paste), Microsoft ditched customers that were willing to support the OS from the start after only one major OS version, perceived connection with Windows 8, which we all know how it fared, extremely slow development cycle for mobile market, lack of true customization of the OS itself.....etc

And to get back on topic, do I think Microsoft redeemed themselves...no I do not, I believe that MS made things worse for their customers and themselves with the release of Windows 10. These few pictures/collages will explain it better than me..

Functionality and ease of use:

Windows-10-We-finally-fixed-everything-1

 

 

Style and looks:

09-1998-Toyota-Corolla-Down-On-the-Junky

 

 

Respect to customers:

1438181294981.thumb.jpg.36af50af009ae579

  • Like 4

And to get back on topic, do I think Microsoft redeemed themselves...no I do not, I believe that MS made things worse for their customers and themselves with the release of Windows 10. These few pictures/collages will explain it better than me..

Respect to customers:

1438181294981.thumb.jpg.36af50af009ae579

I am not going to comment on the other images, but I will say that there are benefits to these potentially invasive features. Moreover, if Microsoft had no respect for its consumers, I doubt very highly that there would be any options to disable any of the features listed.

Windows 10: The first Windows version that is not being judged on what it is, but on what one hopes it will become...

It is unlikely, with numbers exceeding 25 million, that the operating system is primarily judged in this manner. I am certain that many users like at least some of its features.

I am not going to comment on the other images, but I will say that there are benefits to these potentially invasive features. Moreover, if Microsoft had no respect for its consumers, I doubt very highly that there would be any options to disable any of the features listed.

It is unlikely, with numbers exceeding 25 million, that the operating system is primarily judged in this manner. I am certain that many users like at least some of its features.

No, if they had respect for their customers these features would be OPT-IN, not opt out. Most people don't understand they have to not use express settings, and Microsoft knows this, look at how virus and malware spread, by people just clicking next. Microsoft has taken advantage of this with their express settings and the way they make it seem like you have to have a Microsoft email address to sign-in.

It seems that ordinary people don't care much about the negative criticism

http://www.winbeta.org/news/there-are-now-over-50-million-people-using-windows-10-worldwide

No, they bumped Win 10 to "recommended" from "optional", and now everyone who doesn't want 10 has to actually stop it unless they turn off recommended updates, another way Microsoft has used the knowledge they gained from their user base. People don't want to know, they want to push power and be using Facebook, playing Candy Something-or-another, and checking their email.

If people don't bitch and complain, it will just continue to get worse...

  • Like 3

It seems that ordinary people don't care much about the negative criticism

http://www.winbeta.org/news/there-are-now-over-50-million-people-using-windows-10-worldwide

Again the OS success can't be based on free updates a percentage of which are people testing on secondary drives. Let's see how many purchase Windows 10 tablets and phones due to love of the experience.

No, if they had respect for their customers these features would be OPT-IN, not opt out. Most people don't understand they have to not use express settings, and Microsoft knows this, look at how virus and malware spread, by people just clicking next. Microsoft has taken advantage of this with their express settings and the way they make it seem like you have to have a Microsoft email address to sign-in.

No, they bumped Win 10 to "recommended" from "optional", and now everyone who doesn't want 10 has to actually stop it unless they turn off recommended updates, another way Microsoft has used the knowledge they gained from their user base. People don't want to know, they want to push power and be using Facebook, playing Candy Something-or-another, and checking their email.

If people don't bitch and complain, it will just continue to get worse...

The Customer Experience Improvement Program that is basically what Windows 10 is doing has been around for over a decade and has never once been opt-in.

Yet people just now start complaining about it? Much ado about nothing.

Again the OS success can't be based on free updates a percentage of which are people testing on secondary drives. Let's see how many purchase Windows 10 tablets and phones due to love of the experience.

I seriously doubt any large percentage are testing it on secondary drives when for most, the eligible OS is on the main one.  Remember, you said free updates, not retail purchases.

I seriously doubt any large percentage are testing it on secondary drives when for most, the eligible OS is on the main one.  Remember, you said free updates, not retail purchases.

You can seriously doubt all you want it isn't conclusive proof. And I do know what I said, I don't know what your point is.

You can seriously doubt all you want it isn't conclusive proof. And I do know what I said, I don't know what your point is.

You harp on me for inconclusive proof while spouting assumptions yourself?

Ironic.

Look at this logically. Insiders are not the majority downloading rtm. Why you might ask? Well, I am glad you did. Because most Insiders had rtm 2 weeks prior to GA, and the program was closed off to new joins.

The ONLY way to get it free is via eligible upgrade and that is going to be mostly people using a primary OS, not a secondary test drive.  So your claim makes little sense.

The Customer Experience Improvement Program that is basically what Windows 10 is doing has been around for over a decade and has never once been opt-in.

Yet people just now start complaining about it? Much ado about nothing.

No, it's not and you know it, it's not even close to the same thing. The CEIP, never collected the amount of personalized data they are collecting now. No one had an email account tied to Windows 7, your searches weren't being collected from within the OS, you voice and location weren't being collected, the sheer amount of data your OS knows about your life is scary, and now Microsoft has that information as well. What is their policy on who gets that data? Will I be allowed to completely opt out if they decide the want to share or sell it to Amazon? or Porn Hub?

Can you tell me that the information that has been collected so far is completely anonamized and stored securely in something strong that a plain text file? No, sorry you can't because you have no idea what data is even being collected because they haven't stated exactly what is being collected.

You harp on me for inconclusive proof while spouting assumptions yourself?

Ironic.

Look at this logically. Insiders are not the majority downloading rtm. Why you might ask? Well, I am glad you did. Because most Insiders had rtm 2 weeks prior to GA, and the program was closed off to new joins.

The ONLY way to get it free is via eligible upgrade and that is going to be mostly people using a primary OS, not a secondary test drive.  So your claim makes little sense.

You complain about my statements but make your own over and over. "Ironic"

There are multiple ways to have a secondary HDD run an "eligible upgrade" for anyone with 1/2 a brain. So your statement is invalid.

No, it's not and you know it, it's not even close to the same thing. The CEIP, never collected the amount of personalized data they are collecting now. No one had an email account tied to Windows 7, your searches weren't being collected from within the OS, you voice and location weren't being collected, the sheer amount of data your OS knows about your life is scary, and now Microsoft has that information as well. What is their policy on who gets that data? Will I be allowed to completely opt out if they decide the want to share or sell it to Amazon? or Porn Hub?

Can you tell me that the information that has been collected so far is completely anonamized and stored securely in something strong that a plain text file? No, sorry you can't because you have no idea what data is even being collected because they haven't stated exactly what is being collected.

Prove that it didn't.  You have no idea what is being collected past what you have read.

You complain about my statements but make your own over and over. "Ironic"

There are multiple ways to have a secondary HDD run an "eligible upgrade" for anyone with 1/2 a brain. So your statement is invalid.

For a geek.

Most consumers are not. So no, your statement is invalid. Try think beyond yourself for a moment. Most consumers do not build their own machines or buy retail versions of Windows. Did you not realize this?

You can seriously doubt all you want it isn't conclusive proof. And I do know what I said, I don't know what your point is.

Don't worry, those of us who can comprehend simple logic understand that:

Free upgrade + a sly "important" update that puts a big "Get Windows 10 - reserve your copy" prompt in your system tray and on your Windows Update screen + huge existing user base + curiosity = a LOT of installs.

As you say, the proof will be in the pudding - not the number of installs, but how many people actually stick with Windows 10 and furthermore, buy into the MS app environment.

Don't worry, those of us who can comprehend simple logic understand that:

Free upgrade + a sly "important" update that puts a big "Get Windows 10 - reserve your copy" prompt in your system tray and on your Windows Update screen + huge existing user base + curiosity = a LOT of installs.

As you say, the proof will be in the pudding - not the number of installs, but how many people actually stick with Windows 10 and furthermore, buy into the MS app environment.

For someone who comprehended so well, you missed where he said secondary installs.

Prove that it didn't.  You have no idea what is being collected past what you have read.

Yet, you do? I'm pretty sure since they didn't record voice searches (not available in Win7), or tied an email account to my login (might be possible but was never ask for in Win 7), or tie my email to my software purchases (store not available in Win7), so how could they have even collected the same amount of data?

People should be getting tired of having to opt-out of data collection, but they only want the shiny, they learned nothing from Assange or Snowden. My OS shouldn't be sending ANYTHING to ANYONE unless I allow it, not by some buried switch set to broadcast unless I dig to find it, and then it should be ON or OFF. There should be no ambiguity, no "basic"! If Microsoft wasn't smart enough to listen to the people who screamed at them for Win 8, why would they listen to the quietly transmitted data from my computer about how WIN 10 is not what I want?

Yet, you do? I'm pretty sure since they didn't record voice searches (not available in Win7), or tied an email account to my login (might be possible but was never ask for in Win 7), or tie my email to my software purchases (store not available in Win7), so how could they have even collected the same amount of data?

People should be getting tired of having to opt-out of data collection, but they only want the shiny, they learned nothing from Assange or Snowden. My OS shouldn't be sending ANYTHING to ANYONE unless I allow it, not by some buried switch set to broadcast unless I dig to find it, and then it should be ON or OFF. There should be no ambiguity, no "basic"! If Microsoft wasn't smart enough to listen to the people who screamed at them for Win 8, why would they listen to the quietly transmitted data from my computer about how WIN 10 is not what I want?

Trust me, they did for voice recognition.

Wait, did you think that Cortana was the first time voice recognition came to Windows?

 

Trust me, they did for voice recognition.

Wait, did you think that Cortana was the first time voice recognition came to Windows?

 

No, but it's the first time it is being packaged for internet searches for the masses, and tied to an email account, and if you are using bing rewards, tied to a real address.

No, if they had respect for their customers these features would be OPT-IN, not opt out. Most people don't understand they have to not use express settings, and Microsoft knows this, look at how virus and malware spread, by people just clicking next. Microsoft has taken advantage of this with their express settings and the way they make it seem like you have to have a Microsoft email address to sign-in.

I could go on for a while about this, but the express settings state what will happen if this option is selected during installation.

Yet, you do? I'm pretty sure since they didn't record voice searches (not available in Win7)

Erm, starting with Windows 7, it is possible to send speech recognition information (training data) to Microsoft, and this could possibly include voice searches if one searches by voice, though I must admit that I am not certain. Either way, the feature can send speech information, but it is entirely optional, just as using the voice capabilities of Cortana is.

The reason Windows Phone isn't more popular has nothing to do with it's user interface. The reason is that almost everyone is already using an android or iOS powered system.

MS just has missed the bus to the mobile mass market.

I think this is true.
Let's say that Windows 10 desktop has a carry-over effect of drawing people to Windows Phone. They will immediately hate it. Why? Because they are already entrenched in the other ecosystems (Apple or Android). None of their passwords will work, all their pictures will be uploaded to a different place, in short it will be a nightmare for the average user.


 

  • Like 2

No, but it's the first time it is being packaged for internet searches for the masses, and tied to an email account, and if you are using bing rewards, tied to a real address.

Moving goalposts?

Your initial comment to me was voice recordings were not sent to MS before now, and that is false.  Why didn't you cry foul with Windows 7, 8, and 8.1?

 

I could go on for a while about this, but the express settings state what will happen if this option is selected during installation.

Erm, starting with Windows 7, it is possible to send speech recognition information (training data) to Microsoft, and this could possibly include voice searches if one searches by voice, though I must admit that I am not certain. Either way, the feature can send speech information, but it is entirely optional, just as using the voice capabilities of Cortana is.

People are so upset about express settings, even though express settings has been around for years. Its like they are offended that they have to think about what they are doing instead of just clicking defaults like mad until their mouse button is broken.

And we wonder why malware is such an issue... ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!