[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

I just watched Ep4, and I'm enjoying it for the most part. One thing is really grating however... the Klingons. Yeah, their prosthetics are ridiculous, as is their garb. I can sort of ignore that. But the one thing that is really annoying me is the fact that they speak in Subtitles! OK, we get it, they're aliens, they don't speak English. But if I'm forced to read the damn subtitles then you might as well do away with half the special effects budget for the Klingon scenes as I am unable to look at them. Seriously, stop it, or at least give us a pure English audio track to choose from.

 

I can't be the only one who is really frustrated by this?

11 hours ago, Slugsie said:

I just watched Ep4, and I'm enjoying it for the most part. One thing is really grating however... the Klingons. Yeah, their prosthetics are ridiculous, as is their garb. I can sort of ignore that. But the one thing that is really annoying me is the fact that they speak in Subtitles! OK, we get it, they're aliens, they don't speak English. But if I'm forced to read the damn subtitles then you might as well do away with half the special effects budget for the Klingon scenes as I am unable to look at them. Seriously, stop it, or at least give us a pure English audio track to choose from.

 

I can't be the only one who is really frustrated by this?

I kinda agree. I'm still missing bits if I forget who's on screen and have to skip back, but I'm hoping that'll be resolved.

 

I'm thinking that...

 

Spoiler

When they mention that the klingons have to give up everything, it might mean the virus that transforms them into the klingons we all know and love, and hopefully makes them speak english too!

 

11 hours ago, Slugsie said:

I can't be the only one who is really frustrated by this?

It's certainly been overdone, I'd say copying from The Americans who have had the Ruski speak for five damn seasons!

I thought the security chief was a bit "gung-ho" in ep4 :s it's definitely a darker take on Trek, it isn't awful, but I still have to get used to it.. the whole 'ship jumping anywhere in space' doesn't fit in any proper Trek timeline does it?

 

Oh yeah and how many looks have the klingons had now? If it's a bridge between TOS and TNG, then OK.. 

10 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I thought the security chief was a bit "gung-ho" in ep4 :s 

Agreed. Definitely a waste of a character, it goes against pretty much everything a Security Officer would actually do

1 hour ago, Steven P. said:

I thought the security chief was a bit "gung-ho" in ep4 :s it's definitely a darker take on Trek, it isn't awful, but I still have to get used to it.. the whole 'ship jumping anywhere in space' doesn't fit in any proper Trek timeline does it?

 

Oh yeah and how many looks have the klingons had now? If it's a bridge between TOS and TNG, then OK.. 

But ST D is set between Enterprise and TOS.

21 hours ago, techbeck said:

It is war time....and a top secret ship.  Does not surprise me what happened.

Unfortunately, the action itself does not speak highly of the officer's IQ, which begs the question, how someone with the lack of obvious reasoning ended up being a security chief of the most important ship in the fleet and in the wartime, no less? It was weak writing with most likely a simple purpose of freeing the top captain's advisor spot for Burnham.

On 09/10/2017 at 2:17 PM, Louisifer said:

I liked how this episode explained the ring design without talking about it. Netflix has spoiled me with releasing whole series, I want to binge on it but i cant. :( 

I think that's cos it airs on TV also, they did the same with Better Call Saul.

On 09/10/2017 at 10:11 PM, Slugsie said:

if I'm forced to read the damn subtitles then you might as well do away with half the special effects

I'd never thought of it that way.  I watch a lot of subtitled movies and I find that I take them in subconsciously - not actively reading them, but rather "following" them - but then again, that's often with languages I speak (French, German, etc - not Klingon).

 

You make quite an interesting point.  I have no issue with subtitles, but your comment that they move visual focus away from the visual action is quite valid.  Nice :)

The Klingon speak is partly annoying in that you need to actively pay attention, which actually isn't a bad thing, but you can't "background watch". but it's good in that like all those special effects, it adds immersion. 

Just now, HawkMan said:

The Klingon speak is partly annoying in that you need to actively pay attention, which actually isn't a bad thing, but you can't "background watch". but it's good in that like all those special effects, it adds immersion. 

And Klingons speaking English would be immersive? They would be as immersive as Germans in Wonder Woman :D

29 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

I'd never thought of it that way.  I watch a lot of subtitled movies and I find that I take them in subconsciously - not actively reading them, but rather "following" them - but then again, that's often with languages I speak (French, German, etc - not Klingon).

 

You make quite an interesting point.  I have no issue with subtitles, but your comment that they move visual focus away from the visual action is quite valid.  Nice :)

I actually normally watch stuff with the subtitles on, because my hearing isn't the best (too much loud music as a kid) and it allows me to understand the dialog if it's not completely clear (if I miss something I can quickly look at the subs and understand). But that's as an aid to following the dialog rather than being forced to read them.

  • Like 3
23 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

The Klingon speak is partly annoying in that you need to actively pay attention, which actually isn't a bad thing, but you can't "background watch". but it's good in that like all those special effects, it adds immersion. 

The Klingon speech breaks immersion for me. Something is immersive if you feel like you're really there. I've never had someone speak and their words appear floating in the air before them in real life.

41 minutes ago, Slugsie said:

I actually normally watch stuff with the subtitles on, because my hearing isn't the best (too much loud music as a kid) and it allows me to understand the dialog if it's not completely clear (if I miss something I can quickly look at the subs and understand). But that's as an aid to following the dialog rather than being forced to read them.

Same here fella!

2 hours ago, Yogurth said:

Unfortunately, the action itself does not speak highly of the officer's IQ, which begs the question, how someone with the lack of obvious reasoning ended up being a security chief of the most important ship in the fleet and in the wartime, no less? It was weak writing with most likely a simple purpose of freeing the top captain's advisor spot for Burnham.

Well, not going to analyze it to much myself.  Doing so will make me not like the show. 

2 hours ago, Yogurth said:

how someone with the lack of obvious reasoning ended up being a security chief of the most important ship in the fleet and in the wartime, no less?

Captain seems like someone who keeps people he trusts close, and perhaps she earned his trust in some of the darker matters.

 

But yes, such a rash action doesn't feel in-keeping with the character and was simply a facile plot device.

5 hours ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

Captain seems like someone who keeps people he trusts close, and perhaps she earned his trust in some of the darker matters.

 

But yes, such a rash action doesn't feel in-keeping with the character and was simply a facile plot device.

I'm sure it was a plot device, no doubt, but the action, when people, even smart people, are pushed to show results or else, then caution is often tossed out the window.  It happens in real life, let alone fictional works.  She made it pretty clear that if the captain doesn't need you then you're out and I doubt she wanted to get tossed out.

9 hours ago, Slugsie said:

The Klingon speech breaks immersion for me. Something is immersive if you feel like you're really there. I've never had someone speak and their words appear floating in the air before them in real life.

they also don't always speak your language. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!