[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

While the ending did feel a bit rushed to me, the way it ended is no different with how other Trek shows manage to end story arcs, they always find some non-lethal, unless it's the Borg, way to end whatever mess they're in towards the end.  Trek has been pulling rabbits out of hats since Kirk on TOS, so I had no issues with how season 1 and the war wrapped up.

 

I loved the fact they played the original TOS music at the end of the final episode when the enterprise showed up, very nice touch.

  • Like 2

Looks like they're already a good bit into Season 2.  

 

 

Notice that we're getting the original uniforms in season 2 it looks like, so they're making the transition from this midway enterprise-TOS uniform design in discovery.

7 hours ago, George P said:

Notice that we're getting the original uniforms in season 2 it looks like, so they're making the transition from this midway enterprise-TOS uniform design in discovery.

Discovery needed these uniforms from the start! They look sharp! Now they just need to ditch the awful look of the Klingons. 

1 hour ago, Dot Matrix said:

Discovery needed these uniforms from the start! They look sharp! Now they just need to ditch the awful look of the Klingons. 

I'm still of the thinking that you needed to show something, a mid-point, between the older enterprise uniforms and the ones in TOS, Discovery tried to do that at least so I wasn't bothered by the choice to not use the TOS style uniforms.  Maybe now that the war is over and star fleet is more or less "starting over", they figured they'd change uniforms?   Viewers could use some explanation as to why trek likes to change it's uniforms so much.   

Jonathan Frakes directing season 2 episode 2.

 

Looks like they're going at a good pace, filming started ~15 days ago the article says.  Season 2 will have 13 episodes only, compared to 15 for season 1.   Wonder if CBS will wait to film all the episodes before they start showing them or maybe start airing them when they're halfway through?

On 4/24/2018 at 8:04 PM, George P said:

Never put it past Trek to use the time travel plot device to make things match up.   

I really REALLY wish they had just let Axanar go ahead than this complete tripe.  It would have been a far more true to the canon story than the random nonsense they pulled out of someone's rear end and called it a Discovery, was...

 

Hell, BUY the Axanar script from them and do it officially!

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, George P said:

Jonathan Frakes directing season 2 episode 2.

 

Looks like they're going at a good pace, filming started ~15 days ago the article says.  Season 2 will have 13 episodes only, compared to 15 for season 1.   Wonder if CBS will wait to film all the episodes before they start showing them or maybe start airing them when they're halfway through?

I remember the days when Trek (and most other shows), were 26 episodes to a season...

 

Aaaah, those were the days...

 

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I remember the days when Trek (and most other shows), were 26 episodes to a season...

 

Aaaah, those were the days...

 

If you want to have a much lower budget then you can do 26 episodes.  Once you double the budget the episode counts go down.  We can sit and debate the plot/story all we want, but discovery has very good vfx compared to past shows.

42 minutes ago, George P said:

If you want to have a much lower budget then you can do 26 episodes.  Once you double the budget the episode counts go down.  We can sit and debate the plot/story all we want, but discovery has very good vfx compared to past shows.

It could have the best VFX in the world, and yet still flop because the story stinks...

Just now, FloatingFatMan said:

It could have the best VFX in the world, and yet still flop because the story stinks...

True, yet in the context of ST:D, it did enough to get a season 2 going and CBS All Access is doing good as well.  For them, it's win win.

 

Besides, every trek series has weak to meh first seasons, doesn't help that you had to get a new show runner because he wanted to work on American Gods 100%.

14 hours ago, George P said:

True, yet in the context of ST:D, it did enough to get a season 2 going and CBS All Access is doing good as well.  For them, it's win win.

 

Besides, every trek series has weak to meh first seasons, doesn't help that you had to get a new show runner because he wanted to work on American Gods 100%.

The last couple of episodes of season 1 were basically the same as what happened in the last few episodes of Enterprise. They finally hit their stride, then run out of ideas and have to end it quickly, resulting in a complete mess.

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

The last couple of episodes of season 1 were basically the same as what happened in the last few episodes of Enterprise. They finally hit their stride, then run out of ideas and have to end it quickly, resulting in a complete mess.

I agree, and the issue goes back to losing the show runner and probably having to improvise on where the plot was going to go, I've heard stories that the writers room was a mess for a bit, and it shows.   Once they brought in the new people and got things back on track, it started to show more later on, but I believe they also wanted a clean break from what the original people set in motion.

 

Season 1 was suppose to have 13 episodes, they added on another 2 so they could end it and start fresh in Season 2.   I don't know why Bryan Fuller bailed, maybe the American Gods money was better?  

2 hours ago, George P said:

Season 1 was suppose to have 13 episodes, they added on another 2 so they could end it and start fresh in Season 2.   I don't know why Bryan Fuller bailed, maybe the American Gods money was better?

This is why Trek needs to be made by people who love Trek, not just having a mild interest in it.

3 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

This is why Trek needs to be made by people who love Trek, not just having a mild interest in it.

<Points to "Star Trek Continues"> Excellent series, now complete. True to the original, down to very authentic reproductions of the classic sets. Good casting - even if the actor wasn't a perfect match to the original the character was recognisable. And it had Chris Doohan playing his father's role of Scotty!

32 minutes ago, DConnell said:

<Points to "Star Trek Continues"> Excellent series, now complete. True to the original, down to very authentic reproductions of the classic sets. Good casting - even if the actor wasn't a perfect match to the original the character was recognisable. And it had Chris Doohan playing his father's role of Scotty!

I'm not of the idea that we need to keep the classic era designed sets when we redo that time period.  It just doesn't make any sense to me, we're way past using punch cards and huge consoles full of flashing lights and big buttons.    For a show that's suppose to be in the future, even around the TOS time period, you have to take the tech of today, as a basis, and move it 3-4 steps ahead so it makes sense aesthetically at least.    That means touch screens and touch input based consoles ala TNG etc even in the TOS time period.

 

Our current idea of what the year 2230+ will be like isn't what it used to be in the 1960.    That's why when they started using holographs for communications in Discovery I didn't think it odd, it's an extension of our current step into AR/VR, to me it makes sense that it'd be used in the future to talk with people far away.  Why limit things to just a big video call/view screen? 

On 5/3/2018 at 11:20 AM, George P said:

If you want to have a much lower budget then you can do 26 episodes.  Once you double the budget the episode counts go down.  We can sit and debate the plot/story all we want, but discovery has very good vfx compared to past shows.

I actually don't agree with that. I feel that late Voyager from Season 4 on wards probably had the best VFX for exterior shots... even when watching it on Netflix now with a HDTV. Before Season 4, with the actual model being filmed vs a computer model, it looked like garbage... but once they started throwing money, their gfx team did an amazing job. Discovery shots always look like a video game and way over processed. They look good, and pretty, but yeah.

1 hour ago, DConnell said:

<Points to "Star Trek Continues"> Excellent series, now complete. True to the original, down to very authentic reproductions of the classic sets. Good casting - even if the actor wasn't a perfect match to the original the character was recognisable. And it had Chris Doohan playing his father's role of Scotty!

Yep! Seen it. Loved it! Damn you Paramount for killing it!

One bit of season 2 speculation, specially since the teaser we got shows new uniforms that better match TOS, since the war is over and most of star fleet got trashed,  the talk is that we're going to see reworked designs for ships, if you look at the teaser at the end where we see the enterprise, it's a mix of elements from TOS and the refit TMP ship, a good middle ground IMO.   I expect to see more ships started with season 2 that fit that style.    

 

I also wouldn't be surprised to see them refit the discovery as they ditch the spore drive tech, probably at some point in season 2 leading into season 3.

On 5/3/2018 at 11:20 AM, George P said:

but discovery has very good vfx compared to past shows.

I'll disagree. No one in this show really knows how to do proper phaser fire, and the external scenes are so dark, I have to turn up my brightness just to see what's going on.

4 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

I'll disagree. No one in this show really knows how to do proper phaser fire, and the external scenes are so dark, I have to turn up my brightness just to see what's going on.

Like most of space is dark?    I mean that bit is subjective ofc, unless you're next to a planet giving off enough light and not out in the middle of space, the scenes will be dark.

On 5/5/2018 at 10:35 AM, George P said:

One bit of season 2 speculation, specially since the teaser we got shows new uniforms that better match TOS, since the war is over and most of star fleet got trashed,  the talk is that we're going to see reworked designs for ships, if you look at the teaser at the end where we see the enterprise, it's a mix of elements from TOS and the refit TMP ship, a good middle ground IMO.   I expect to see more ships started with season 2 that fit that style.    

 

I also wouldn't be surprised to see them refit the discovery as they ditch the spore drive tech, probably at some point in season 2 leading into season 3.

Would be nice to see Discovery ditch those awfully long nacelles, and maybe fill in the negative space in the saucer.

On 5/4/2018 at 12:33 PM, George P said:

I'm not of the idea that we need to keep the classic era designed sets when we redo that time period.  It just doesn't make any sense to me, we're way past using punch cards and huge consoles full of flashing lights and big buttons.    For a show that's suppose to be in the future, even around the TOS time period, you have to take the tech of today, as a basis, and move it 3-4 steps ahead so it makes sense aesthetically at least.    That means touch screens and touch input based consoles ala TNG etc even in the TOS time period.

You have to remember too, that Earth went through WWIII. Humanity was held back quite a number of years technologically speaking. I agree that big consoles of flashing buttons is a little antiquated, but I wouldn't mid seeing big panels with a nice mix of touchscreen and physical buttons. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!