Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, techbeck said:

Wish the Orville didnt take so much stuff from Trek and was more original. 

Yet in the Discovery thread you argue an audience would have trouble with the same :?

Edited by Son_Of_Dad
2 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

They were presented in the same way during Enterprise however

Yeah I guess the were, but they were also still a new branch of Starfleet (though some books and podcasts seem to think S31 was founded when Starfleet was founded also) and they were no where near the organization being shown in Discovery, let alone in DS9. I mean let's be clear here, it seems pretty obvious to most Trekkies that S31 and its advanced tech is being brought in to either bring the show into canon more somehow, or will literally be a maguffin to align it as such. Red Angel stuff not withstanding of course :D

 

I feel that The Orville leans a bit to heavy on the Trek nods (especially so far in S2) and eventually that's going to become tiresome even to us Trekkies. Also, I'd really like it if Seth MacFarlane got a guest spot or even just a cameo in either Discovery or one of the other new Trek shows coming up (though I'd imagine he'd love to be on the Picard show) He's obviously a HUGE Trek fan and it'd be pretty awesome to see him dressed up in a Starfleet/Federation uniform.

5 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

When does Discovery even attempt that? Given every man and his dog is aware of Section 31 in this weeks episode, who when first introduced Starfleet would not even acknowledge the existence of. The Discovery writers are doing "whatever"?

DS9 was 100 years in the future. Do you even know what the CIA's predecessor was without Googling it?
The producers have already said they're Starfleet Intelligence and something in the next century happens and causes them to go underground  - which will more than likely be revealed in the upcoming series.

Enough with your hate and misinformation.

51 minutes ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Yet in the Discovery thread you argue an audience would have trouble with the same :?

There is a difference when another show steals ideas and basically copies another.  As compared to people's opinions on how a new Trek show follows a different timeline. 

 

Bortus and Isack are cheap ST knock offs IMO as well.   There is also the holodeck and many other things taken from ST.  It is a different show, be original.    But I am still giving it a chance as next weeks episode looks to be good. 

28 minutes ago, PeterTHX said:

The producers have already said they're Starfleet Intelligence and something in the next century happens and causes them to go underground 

 

Except Starfleet intelligence is already a known branch of Starfleet which had been mentioned in previous iterations of Star Trek (swing and a miss). They were underground when they originated also.... The most important officer in Starfleet the guy who is actually boldly going where no man had gone before knew nothing about them. So they were underground, then they poked head up only to duck back under. And while everyone knew about them they never thought of sharing any of the super-duper high tech advancements with the rest of Starfleet during a war which they were getting belted in? Ships that could look like asteroids REALLY might have helped out during the fight. please feel free in pointing out misinformation however just because you don't agree with something does not magically make it misinformation.

2 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

 

Except Starfleet intelligence is already a known branch of Starfleet which had been mentioned in previous iterations of Star Trek (swing and a miss). They were underground when they originated also.... The most important officer in Starfleet the guy who is actually boldly going where no man had gone before knew nothing about them. So they were underground, then they poked head up only to duck back under. And while everyone knew about them they never thought of sharing any of the super-duper high tech advancements with the rest of Starfleet during a war which they were getting belted in? Ships that could look like asteroids REALLY might have helped out during the fight. please feel free in pointing out misinformation however just because you don't agree with something does not magically make it misinformation.

Can you please make your posts understandable?

7 hours ago, PeterTHX said:

I can't quite understand why you're frothing at the mouth over Discovery's very existence and your compulsive need to tell everyone such.

Am I? On what do you base that given you couldn't understand my post?

  • Facepalm 1
  • Haha 1

Please play nice, guys. This is a constructive thread about the Orville.

 

... which I do enjoy. It isn't the best show in the world - I feel like it balances between comedy, drama, and satire a little too well, in that it doesn't commit to any of them. It has funny moments and moving moments and good stories and decent characters, but none of them especially stand out. This makes it enjoyable, but not outstanding.

 

I know it isn't popular (graphics don't matter!), but it also has an inconsistent visual quality. The CGI of the outside of the ship is solid, and it clearly isn't trying very hard, but the costumes and some of the sets look really, really cheap, and I can't get over that in my head.

 

(I also appreciate that many of the jokes are very understated and often span many episodes to come to the "punchline" that is never some sarcastic comment one would expect from MacFarlane.)

 

That said, I do enjoy it. The most recent episode with the new security officer and the gay analogs (vague to avoid spoilers) was, imo, really good, and had a really good ending that went to an interesting place. We rarely get that these days.

The critics seem to have done a 180 during season 2. The season 1 rating was in the 20s, the season 2, so far, is in the 90s. And the first season was probably better.

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Zagadka said:

The critics seem to have done a 180 during season 2. The season 1 rating was in the 20s, the season 2, so far, is in the 90s. And the first season was probably better.

I rarely agree with critics. Generally, I find them to be a bunch of morons who seem to have an ingrained hatred of anything scifi.

 

  • Like 2
3 hours ago, Zagadka said:

The season 1 rating was in the 20s, the season 2, so far, is in the 90s. And the first season was probably better.

Rotten Tomatoes? Nerdrotic did a video on it and nailed it for the most part given it has very little difference between seasons

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I find them to be a bunch of morons who seem to have an ingrained hatred of anything scifi.

 

They seem to have a very different opinion than fans looking at ratings for The Orville, Discovery, Dr Who and the more recent Star Wars content

Just shows how useless critics are.

 

Last episode (Identity, Part 1) was excellent. Felt like the series has officially started. Some of the acting was really good. No spoilers. For a reason.

 

Well, one very minor tidbit really bothering me...

 

Spoiler

the whole Kaylon cheap costume situation is unfortunate, in hindsight.

 

But... Please cut me a corner piece.

Yea, which is why I said that it feels like the series has officially started. It is the first dramatic  universe-building, over the usual character driven episodes. Until now, we've gotten some cultural commentary, but this is the first big thing to happen and really involve the Union as an entity. Wasn't expecting it.

It was also a season finale style cliffhanger, which the show hasn't done before right? I don't remember a single double episode from them yet, or am I forgetting something? Plus, with who did what they did, I didn't expect that AT ALL. I mean, I guess we'll have to wait until next week to see what happens with that and all, but uh, yeah wow. That was legit one of the best hours of scifi TV I've seen since the Babylon 5/Deep Space Nine heyday of scifi. I'm not even joking.

  • Like 2

Btw, anyone else find that weird mix of musical notes from Aliens and Star Trek TMP a little off putting? Though I kinda think that was the idea 😛 I especially like how they used some of those edgy 70s guitar riffs from TMP heh.

1 minute ago, Yogurth said:

Identity Part 1 was a good episode but one planet vs entire Union, no matter how advanced? All of a sudden their collective IQ is in question :)

I don't think numbers matter to the Kaylon, and I'm pretty sure they would wipe the floor with not only the Union itself but the Krill also. I mean, they are basically the Borg aren't they? Just not evil (or areeee theyyyyyyy!) like the Borg.

Well, they switched the Orville off like a switch and said they were seconds away from being destroyed, so I think the Union would be in trouble...

 

BTW, aside from the outfits, one of the things that bothers me is the design of the Orville - specifically, the docking in the rear being inside the rings... that makes no sense at all. It is a beautiful ship, but the shuttle docking must be maddening.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!