Could this be malware?


Recommended Posts

yeah, at this point it looks like that hidden boot folder was not the cause of your stuttering; it was most likely coincidence and maybe a leftover from your previous install.

 

Drivers are a good thing to look at; in this case it would be your SATA chipset driver you would want to check for. I would also check if there's a newer firmware for your SSD on the manufacturer's website.

 

There are monitoring tools that could help determine the stutter cause as well but I can't think of any off hand right now; another member may be able to assist on that part if needed :)

Thanks for the help. Yeah if anyone can suggest any further actions please let me know. The best way to describe what's happening now is if I open a folder windows the whole thing then flickers for a split second then the contents shows up.

1 hour ago, devnulllore said:

Any other thoughts on this issue? Still happening after updating drivers. Still getting hitching, pauses, hiccups whatever you want to call them.

Does it happen in Safe Mode?

So it keeps happening in Safe Mode huh...

 

I think what I'd do if I had the time would be:

- Image the boot drive, just in case.

- Delete it all and install Windows anew, letting it take care of drivers.

- Check there's no device without driver, or malfunctioning in the device manager.

- Assess what happens:

 

All good? Awesome, time to install the software I use and after that if there's still no problem delete the image I made at first, no need for it anymore (extracting any data I need off it before I do).

 

Still the same? Maybe check the Applications or System event logs in the Event Viewer around the time you experienced it and see if there's something interesting. It could be a driver that is misbehaving, or some damaged hardware component; but having a clean environment would eliminate some variables.

 

By the way, you're not overclocking your machine, are you? That could be another source for that kind of instability.

17 minutes ago, aphanic said:

So it keeps happening in Safe Mode huh...

 

I think what I'd do if I had the time would be:

- Image the boot drive, just in case.

- Delete it all and install Windows anew, letting it take care of drivers.

- Check there's no device without driver, or malfunctioning in the device manager.

- Assess what happens:

 

All good? Awesome, time to install the software I use and after that if there's still no problem delete the image I made at first, no need for it anymore (extracting any data I need off it before I do).

 

Still the same? Maybe check the Applications or System event logs in the Event Viewer around the time you experienced it and see if there's something interesting. It could be a driver that is misbehaving, or some damaged hardware component; but having a clean environment would eliminate some variables.

 

By the way, you're not overclocking your machine, are you? That could be another source for that kind of instability.

Agreed. At this point, there isn’t anything left to do. If it happens on a clean install with nothing installed, it’s likely a drive issue. 

Ok. I am going to do another fresh install to see if I missed anything. Should I just go with the drivers Windows uses rather than my usual method of installing the newest one? Any other suggestions before I do this?

9 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

Ok. I am going to do another fresh install to see if I missed anything. Should I just go with the drivers Windows uses rather than my usual method of installing the newest one? Any other suggestions before I do this?

Don’t hook it up to the network at all. Test it first. 

One thing has just crossed my mind. I use Eset System Security which has never given me a problem BUT I also bought the latest Acronis Backup to make images of my drive. This version of Acronis has a built in ransomware scanner. Can this be causing the stuttering?

2 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

One thing has just crossed my mind. I use Eset System Security which has never given me a problem BUT I also bought the latest Acronis Backup to make images of my drive. This version of Acronis has a built in ransomware scanner. Can this be causing the stuttering?

1 of the first things i do if i have issues is make sure antivirus/firewall software isn't causing the issue, you could try uninstalling it temporarily and see if that fixes it, what stage are you at as 16hrs ago you said you would reinstall Windows, did you also try another cable as suggested? :) 

I have not reinstalled yet. I went and bought new SATA3 cables and replaced them all. I also checked Station Drives for the latest drivers this time. I found a few new ones for network, audio and USB but none fixed the problem. I was just trying this time to see if some software may be the issue.

4 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

I have not reinstalled yet. I went and bought new SATA3 cables and replaced them all. I also checked Station Drives for the latest drivers this time. I found a few new ones for network, audio and USB but none fixed the problem. I was just trying this time to see if some software may be the issue.

Uninstall you're antivirus and see if that fixes it is what i would do, if it doesn't then i have no clue sorry.

 

Edit.

 

Not sure if you have said but if you run it in safe mode without the antivirus what happens then?

29 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

I tried it in safe mode but still did it. I turned off the ransomware scanner in Acronis backup and it's better but not gone. Maybe it's Eset System Security?

 

Why are you holding back uninstalling Eset as it is very quick and easy to do, if that doesn't fix the issue then that is another idea crossed off the list?

 

Don't think about it just do it. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!