Could this be malware?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, devnulllore said:

Yes I am logging into my Microsoft Account. Mi licence is valid as far as I know. The registration is in my bios.

The lag, yes but Explorer has not crashed since I got rid of the insiders build.

I think others may have already mentioned it but are you able to take a video of this happening, either using OBS or simply recording the screen with a camera?

I was just monitoring the processes while trying to get it to repeat and suddenly 'chrome - software reporter tool' showed up 6 times and pegged my CPU and the power usage level went to very high stayed there for a few seconds then stopped. Could this be a suspect? As for getting a video I have never tried it.

16 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

Here is what I was talking about with Chrome and the software reporting tool.

taskmanager.jpg

Possible, I've seen that process bring some systems to it's knees. I've removed chrome from a few of my machine's because of it. That software reporter tool uses a ridiculous mount of cpu.

32 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

I was just monitoring the processes while trying to get it to repeat and suddenly 'chrome - software reporter tool' showed up 6 times and pegged my CPU and the power usage level went to very high stayed there for a few seconds then stopped. Could this be a suspect? As for getting a video I have never tried it.

I doubt it because you said in a previous post it was happening on a clean install with nothing else yet installed.

47 minutes ago, Vince800 said:

I doubt it because you said in a previous post it was happening on a clean install with nothing else yet installed.

No, you are correct I had not thought of that. Either way I disabled the tool to see if it helps.

Yeah I am curious as well why yours is showing 32..

 

I just fired chrome up.. And it showing as 64 on my system

chrome.thumb.png.26aa2514f939f67084b8aa91ee8441c8.png

 

What version of chrome are you running?

Google Chrome is up to date

Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

47 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Yeah I am curious as well why yours is showing 32..

 

I just fired chrome up.. And it showing as 64 on my system

chrome.thumb.png.26aa2514f939f67084b8aa91ee8441c8.png

 

What version of chrome are you running?

Google Chrome is up to date

Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

I am using the 64 bit version. copy and paste from Chrome: Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

 

I'd try uninstalling chrome for a while see if it clears up. As an alternative to Chrome I'd recommend Brave.

 

Brave is still chromium based but without some of googles bloat and with a built in adblocker and a few other nice things. It can still use extensions from the chrome web store too

 

https://brave.com 

  • Thanks 1

The time you have spent on this even at 10$ an hour you could of prob bought whole new machine ;)

 

You got something really odd going on - if you say your system is 64bit, and you install 64 bit software and its running as 32bit?  Why would that chrome software reporting show its running 32?  Had you installed multiple copies of chrome?  You say your doing a clean install, but then we come to find out you have xyz installed.. Clean would be NOTHING but the OS..

 

Are you running anything that is putting stuff in compatibility mode?

 

Run it like that.. Do you have any problems before you install software X... Run it like that for a while, do you see the issue?  If not then move on to installing software Y..

 

Also noticed you EVGA X server something running - so this again points to not being actually "clean" install.  Don't use your MS account when you install it... Just install it pure clean..

It is the 64 bit version of Chrome and I had already eliminated my graphics software before installing it. The issue began again before I even installed new drivers so I was in the process of installing the software to see if anything exacerbated the situation. Chrome did that.

So I updated all my drivers as I usually would and am still having the issue. Windows Explorer CPU usage spikes, system lags for a second or two them stops and Windows Explorer crashes my desktop every now and then.

 

Does this now sound more hardware related? Where do I go from here? I checked my MB temps and they are all ok.

Need to drill into the processes to really see.  I don’t know. I can’t do it for you.  I gave you the tools.  

 

For errors to not show in event cower is odd if it is a hardware issue.  If it were a big hardware issue you would get blue screens....is you computer locking up to where you have to reboot it?   The issue you were having was high drive usage, has this changed?   Are you now seeing high cpu usage?  Os is it crashing?

Oh sorry I completely forgot to check the event log since the new install. I have a bunch of errors and warnings. The first error is DistributedCOM 10010. There are dozens of these all in about 10 minute increments. The second error is Service Control Manager 7009, 7023, 7031 and 7034. Then I have Bits Client 16392, volmgr 46 and KernalPNP 225. There are also dozens of warnings if you want me to list them. That's where I am so far. Let me know if you need any more info.

I really think that it would be helpful if you could record a video of this happening as it may be an easy answer if we could actually see what you're getting here. You could even record the screen using a camera or phone if you're not familiar with OBS etc.

 

Just as thought, are you sorting folders by date? I've found that on Windows if you have a large number of files in a directory and it's sorted by date, it will take a few seconds to sort itself on first access sometimes.

Well you should prob look into the details of each error/warning and look to correct stuff that is not correct.

 

I'm not seeing any dcom 10010 errors, but in mine I see some 10016, which I have just corrected.  Decom permissions can be adjusted..

 

Volmgr 46, points to crash dump file not there? Not created?

http://www.eventid.net/display-eventid-46-source-volmgr-eventno-10647-phase-1.htm

 

Are you disabling swap?? ie your pagefile?

On 8/7/2019 at 8:05 AM, devnulllore said:

Untitled-1.thumb.jpg.d07831a3535fc348ebe747ec2ac6b686.jpg

I ran the rescue disk and deleted the boot folder but still accesses the drive and causes hitching (system pauses) when it does.

TL;DR 6 pages, so sorry if it's been addressed already, but you are missing lots of unallocated space there, ~ 46GB.

I hadn't noticed that screenshot before.. I would agree 46GB of SSD space is nothing to sneeze at ;)  If had to guess, I would say its setting for over provisioning... Would have nothing to do with this issue.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!