Recommended Posts

So apparently the finale has caused rifts within Lucasfilm.  The box-ticking SJW that is Kathleen Kennedy is livid at being (what she perceives as) undermined by Favreau and Filoni.  No "agenda" beyond good stories and great telling.  Having a white male as the saviour undermines her entire "female lead with no training" heroine figure.  Rumour is that there are deep divisions and she's slyly trying to find ways to derail the narative, using things she controls such as comics and so on.

 

Or take this with a pinch of salt as the source I heard it from is one of those who rants about such stuff.  But look back at the last few SW films...

35 minutes ago, NJ Louch said:

So apparently the finale has caused rifts within Lucasfilm.  The box-ticking SJW that is Kathleen Kennedy is livid at being (what she perceives as) undermined by Favreau and Filoni.  No "agenda" beyond good stories and great telling.  Having a white male as the saviour undermines her entire "female lead with no training" heroine figure.  Rumour is that there are deep divisions and she's slyly trying to find ways to derail the narative, using things she controls such as comics and so on.

 

Or take this with a pinch of salt as the source I heard it from is one of those who rants about such stuff.  But look back at the last few SW films...

What's done is done, you can't retcon the whole ending half of the season final.   If it's true and she's mad for some reason well too bad.   She should be happy fans love Ahsoka so much and that there's a show with her on the way, there's your female hero if you're craving for one.    Besides the first half of the final ep was chicks being badass.   

 

Personally, I don't have issue with the idea of Rey, it was interesting till they screwed it up themselves.  The fans are done with the sequel trilogy, I bet most would be happy if they retconned them fully.     The whole first order bit is dumb thinking back on it, a planet size version of the death star , though I know it's from the comics but come on.     You can spend all day poking holes in the trilogy till there's nothing left, just bad story telling.

  • Like 3
13 minutes ago, NJ Louch said:

So apparently the finale has caused rifts within Lucasfilm.  The box-ticking SJW that is Kathleen Kennedy is livid at being (what she perceives as) undermined by Favreau and Filoni.  No "agenda" beyond good stories and great telling.  Having a white male as the saviour undermines her entire "female lead with no training" heroine figure.  Rumour is that there are deep divisions and she's slyly trying to find ways to derail the narative, using things she controls such as comics and so on.

 

Or take this with a pinch of salt as the source I heard it from is one of those who rants about such stuff.  But look back at the last few SW films...

Well doing a search I found this site, but I don't know anything about their history or validity.

 

I don't know what she is expecting. Luke's appearance wasn't cheered because he's a white male who would be the hero. Hell, one of the few things I really enjoyed about the sequel story was that it showed how he failed after RotJ, and his appearance in The Mandalorian didn't change that story. He and Boba Fett were cheered because they were childhood icons. For me, my issue with the sequels had nothing to do with a female lead character and everything to do with it being a rehash of the original's story which lost its direction as the films went on.

If she tries to change the narrative solely in the name of feminism she won't gain an audience, she'll just lose the current audience.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, NJ Louch said:

So apparently the finale has caused rifts within Lucasfilm.  The box-ticking SJW that is is livid at being (what she perceives as) undermined by Favreau and Filoni.  No "agenda" beyond good stories and great telling.  Having a white male as the saviour undermines her entire "female lead with no training" heroine figure.  Rumour is that there are deep divisions and she's slyly trying to find ways to derail the narative, using things she controls such as comics and so on.

 

Or take this with a pinch of salt as the source I heard it from is one of those who rants about such stuff.  But look back at the last few SW films...

Yes, let's look at the last couple of SW films like Episode VIII where Luke Skywalker was the savior/hero?

 

9 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

Well doing a search I found this site, but I don't know anything about their history or validity.

 

I don't know what she is expecting. Luke's appearance wasn't cheered because he's a white male who would be the hero. Hell, one of the few things I really enjoyed about the sequel story was that it showed how he failed after RotJ, and his appearance in The Mandalorian didn't change that story. He and Boba Fett were cheered because they were childhood icons. For me, my issue with the sequels had nothing to do with a female lead character and everything to do with it being a rehash of the original's story which lost its direction as the films went on.

If she tries to change the narrative solely in the name of feminism she won't gain an audience, she'll just lose the current audience.

That link has to be the dumbest thing I have read in a while...

 

"In fact, I’m even told that individuals at Lucasfilm have been reading articles here on Pirates and Princesses, as well as watching videos on Clownfish TV..."

 

Someone has to tell this guy no one cares about his blog.

6 minutes ago, Superuser said:

Yes, let's look at the last couple of SW films like Episode VIII where Luke Skywalker was the savior/hero

Not only was he not the savior, they made him out to look like an idiot.

  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Not only was he not the savior, they made him out to look like an idiot.

Are you talking about Episode VII? LOL He showed up in Episode VIII and all the other rebels were literally in awe of him and he saved the day while in the process sacrificed himself.

10 minutes ago, Superuser said:

Are you talking about Episode VII? LOL He showed up in Episode VIII and all the other rebels were literally in awe of him and he saved the day while in the process sacrificed himself.

I'm talking about when he acted like an idiot at the start of the film, just tossing the light neighbor. 

  • Like 2
Just now, warwagon said:

I'm talking about when he acted like an idiot at the start of the film, just tossing the light neighbor. 

OK? All heroes first make mistakes then redeem themselves. A story told a million times. I don't want to debate every scene in the last trilogy because a lot of it was not very good. I am referring to the idea in the original quote that white males can't be shown being heroic in Star Wars anymore.

 

TBH I am so tired of insecure males getting their panties in a bunch (not referring to you) over every strong female character that comes about.

  • Facepalm 2
1 hour ago, Superuser said:

OK? All heroes first make mistakes then redeem themselves. A story told a million times. I don't want to debate every scene in the last trilogy because a lot of it was not very good. I am referring to the idea in the original quote that white males can't be shown being heroic in Star Wars anymore.

 

TBH I am so tired of insecure males getting their panties in a bunch (not referring to you) over every strong female character that comes about.

It's not about the strong female characters, it's about the strong male characters being REPLACED and then EMASCULATED by those making the movies in the first place.  This isn't even the actress's fault, she's just reading a script and doing her job.

 

I have zero issues with strong female character roles, but I DO have a problem with them replacing existing male characters and destroying them in the process.  If Hollyweird wants us to embrace their female leads, then give us ORIGINAL characters with GOOD story lines, not super powered Mary Sues with story lines that pee all over our childhood heroes.

  • Like 3
46 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I have zero issues with strong female character roles, but I DO have a problem with them replacing existing male characters and destroying them in the process.  If Hollyweird wants us to embrace their female leads, then give us ORIGINAL characters with GOOD story lines, not super powered Mary Sues with story lines that pee all over our childhood heroes.

Exactly, anyone who disagrees with me is entitled to their own opinion, but I am fed up of being force fed political correctness in the guise of "entertainment".

  • Like 3

The sad thing is that they tried to make Rey a female version of Luke and did a ###### poor job of it. Instead of making her original /unique. 

 

 

  • Like 2
21 minutes ago, George P said:

The sad thing is that they tried to make Rey a female version of Luke and did a ###### poor job of it. Instead of making her original /unique. 

 

 

Like I said, super powered Mary Sue's.

  • Like 3
2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

It's not about the strong female characters, it's about the strong male characters being REPLACED and then EMASCULATED by those making the movies in the first place.  This isn't even the actress's fault, she's just reading a script and doing her job.

 

I have zero issues with strong female character roles, but I DO have a problem with them replacing existing male characters and destroying them in the process.  If Hollyweird wants us to embrace their female leads, then give us ORIGINAL characters with GOOD story lines, not super powered Mary Sues with story lines that pee all over our childhood heroes.

 

1 hour ago, Steven P. said:

Exactly, anyone who disagrees with me is entitled to their own opinion, but I am fed up of being force fed political correctness in the guise of "entertainment".

 

There is many Star Wars show/movies and some have strong male charterers while other others have strong female charterers (or both). Sorry, one of three trilogies had a lead female character. LOL

 

 

31 minutes ago, George P said:

The sad thing is that they tried to make Rey a female version of Luke and did a ###### poor job of it. Instead of making her original /unique. 

 

Not going to totally disagree with that but I hate tell you this but the story of Luke was NOT original /unique. A common folk, orphan who doesn't know his parents who becomes a hero has been told a million times.

13 minutes ago, Superuser said:

There is many Star Wars show/movies and some have strong male charterers while other others have strong female charterers (or both). Sorry, one of three trilogies had a lead female character. LOL

Uh yeah... Not sure what you're on, but it must be some good stuff.  We're not talking about past Star Wars, we're talking about Kathleen Kennedy Star Wars.  You know, the SEQUELS that have been released over the past few years and are widely hated by a large percentage of the fan base because of the Mary Sue character and how they gutted Luke and the others?  Hell, they even turned Leia into Mary Poppins...

 

13 minutes ago, Superuser said:

 

Not going to totally disagree with that but I hate tell you this but the story of Luke was NOT original /unique. A common folk, orphan who doesn't know his parents who becomes a hero has been told a million times.

No one claimed the basic story line was original.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Superuser said:

Sorry, one of three trilogies had a lead female character.

And yet it didn't have a strong enough story with character development or justification to carry her.  You wanna tell the story of a strong powerful female?  Ahsoka has the fans basically wetting themselves for it - and Filoni indulged so amazingly well with her character going from the padawan "snips" through to someone who defied the definitions of the SW universe.

 

Or Mara Jade...

8 minutes ago, NJ Louch said:

And yet it didn't have a strong enough story with character development or justification to carry her.  You wanna tell the story of a strong powerful female?  Ahsoka has the fans basically wetting themselves for it - and Filoni indulged so amazingly well with her character going from the padawan "snips" through to someone who defied the definitions of the SW universe.

 

Or Mara Jade...

Ahsoka is a great character, no denying it. Filoni handled her growth from an obnoxious smart ass padawan to wise ex-jedi masterfully BUT, if Mara Jade showed up, SW fans would literally explode from excitement...

1 minute ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Ahsoka is a great character, no denying it. Filoni handled her growth from an obnoxious smart ass padawan to wise ex-jedi masterfully BUT, if Mara Jade showed up, SW fans would literally explode from excitement...

Exactly, so this baseless ad-hominem "You don't like it because boys can't cope with strong female leads, you're all just mysoginists" (also known as the "Sony Ghostbusters Tactic") is utter hogwash.  Heck even to the point that Rogue One was possibly my favourite modern SW movie.

 

It's all about priorities:

  • Filoni's priorities seem to be good stories and character development
  • Kennedy's seem to be shoehorned inclusivity and setpieces

I'm all for inclusivity, but not at the cost of the actual story or trampling over existing cannon.  My generation grew up watching Ep6 at the cinema and had our "Hero Luke" that we had held on to for decades.  We wanted to be him and play with lightsabres as a kid, we read about his ongoing stories as a teen, we saw his back story in our 20s, we played games that skirted close to his world in our 30s.  And then he was suddenly turned into some grumpy, weird old hermit in our 40s - with such a thin backstory for this change that it wasn't acceptable.

 

Then Filoni and Favreau reminded us of the Jedi Master that we last saw on screens in 1983.  And it wasn't to anyone's detriment.  It didn't hurt any wannabe-victim society group.  It wasn't forced and it wasn't unjustified - heck it was fully explained via Moff Gideon's facial expressions.  Was it a little deus-ex machina?  Sure, for now.  But it's going somewhere.

 

And let's look at it this way - what has kept Disney afloat in 2020?  Disney+, and what is the ONE THING currently worth watching on Disney+, the one thing that has pushed subscriptions through the roof?  Yup, the awesome storytelling, world building, character arcs, reverence to cannon and presentation of The Mandalorian.

 

Realistically, Disney should look at Kennedy and her cohorts (massively including Pablo Hidalgo for his stupid comments*) and realise that they aren't the massive money spinners that they thought they would be.  Did the sequel trilogy make dollar?  Sure.  But did it setup an ongoing franchise for long-term storytelling and a bankable future?  Sweet lord no.

 

* Telling someone who cried at the season finale that "Emotions are not for sharing"... 'Scuse me?  I cried like a baby, and Disney love that because there's no easier way to get people to part with money than to play upon emotions.  When they play the SW theme in the fireworks and hold that note for just a couple of seconds longer, or when they play the theme lightly on piano, they know what they are doing.  It's the same bankable nostalgia a showing us a Jedi Master arrive in a single X-Wing.  "That thing you love? Here's more of it without watering it down!"

  • Thanks 3
9 minutes ago, NJ Louch said:

And let's look at it this way - what has kept Disney afloat in 2020?  Disney+, and what is the ONE THING currently worth watching on Disney+, the one thing that has pushed subscriptions through the roof?  Yup, the awesome storytelling, world building, character arcs, reverence to cannon and presentation of The Mandalorian.

 

Realistically, Disney should look at Kennedy and her cohorts (massively including Pablo Hidalgo for his stupid comments*) and realise that they aren't the massive money spinners that they thought they would be.  Did the sequel trilogy make dollar?  Sure.  But did it setup an ongoing franchise for long-term storytelling and a bankable future?  Sweet lord no.

I think Disney are starting to wake up to this fact too.  From what I've heard on the rumour mill, they've already shut down Kennedy's attempts at expanding her upcoming Acolyte show into a wider universe and are giving Filoni and Favreau more leeway in what they can do.  Don't be surprised to see more and more elements from SW Legends brought into their shows in the future and quite possibly, a backdoor retconning of the sequels.

 

Fortunately they have about 30 years of time they can play with between Jedi and Awakens.

  • Like 2
6 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I think Disney are starting to wake up to this fact too.  From what I've heard on the rumour mill, they've already shut down Kennedy's attempts at expanding her upcoming Acolyte show into a wider universe and are giving Filoni and Favreau more leeway in what they can do.  Don't be surprised to see more and more elements from SW Legends brought into their shows in the future and quite possibly, a backdoor retconning of the sequels.

 

Fortunately they have about 30 years of time they can play with between Jedi and Awakens.

That's exactly what I'm hearing.  So, worth noting that while I'm a huge Star Wars fan, I'm a MASSIVE Disney follower.  I'm not gonna say "fan" because that suggests that I love watching cartoons (which is not my thing).  I love the parks, I am fascinated by the backstage machinations, I have memorabilia dating back to before the Disneyland opening and so on - and from that I understand Disney.  I know how they work, why they do what they do, how they manipulate their guests and viewers - I've no issue with it, I just recognise it.  And from that, I can guarantee that they value longer-term bankable storytelling over short-term goals.  While yes, they are a massive money and marketing machine, there genuinely is a respect for their stance, and they absolutely are not the box-ticking leftists that many people assume.  That was ALL on Kennedy; if anything was on Disney it would have been the marketing and tie-in products aspects.  This is the same company that signed-off on "so everyone dies at the end" of Rogue One, the same company that turned Tony Stark's death into manipulative horror scenes in Homecoming, the same company that heard for 5 years that "Elsa needs a girlfriend" and simply did not, the same company that showed Trump the same reverence as any other president in their Hall Of Presidents.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, NJ Louch said:

That's exactly what I'm hearing.  So, worth noting that while I'm a huge Star Wars fan, I'm a MASSIVE Disney follower.  I'm not gonna say "fan" because that suggests that I love watching cartoons (which is not my thing).  I love the parks, I am fascinated by the backstage machinations, I have memorabilia dating back to before the Disneyland opening and so on - and from that I understand Disney.  I know how they work, why they do what they do, how they manipulate their guests and viewers - I've no issue with it, I just recognise it.  And from that, I can guarantee that they value longer-term bankable storytelling over short-term goals.  While yes, they are a massive money and marketing machine, there genuinely is a respect for their stance, and they absolutely are not the box-ticking leftists that many people assume. 

 

Absolutely. Disney are a money making machine.  Hurt their income and they WILL take note.

1 minute ago, NJ Louch said:

That was ALL on Kennedy; if anything was on Disney it would have been the marketing and tie-in products aspects.  This is the same company that signed-off on "so everyone dies at the end" of Rogue One.

I greatly enjoyed Rogue One, but it wasn't without its problems.  The main one being that as I knew they'd all die at the end, it was hard to get emotionally involved with the characters and thus I didn't care when they all died.  That was a shame as there was some REALLY good characters introduced in that movie and there was NO need to kill them all off.

6 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

there was some REALLY good characters introduced in that movie and there was NO need to kill them all off

Yeah, I agree.  It felt a lot like they were making a point, but I'm not sure what the point was.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!