Recommended Posts

187,000 pre-orders so far (Sunday, Nov 24)

 

It's a friggin post-apocalyptic tank

 

Tesla-Cybertruck-Electric-Pickup-Truck-Rear-3-4-in-Motion.thumb.jpg.0114074274a044aa43814fbdeeb52877.jpg

 

Tesla-Cybertruck-Electric-Pickup-Truck-Front-3-4-in-Motion-on-Road-Course-2.thumb.jpg.53c93f6be3b183d8e06f0e1bfde547e7.jpg

 

Availability: 2021, 2022 (depends on version)

 

1 motor 2WD: $39,900 (250+ mile range, 7,500 lb tow)

2 motor AWD: $49,900 300+ mile range, 10,000 lb tow)

3 motor AWD: $69,900 (500+ mile range, 14,000 lb tow)

 

Battery:  1 or 2 layer stacked lithium ion

Charging: up to 250 kWh

 

(Tesla's batteries will iterate at least 1 generation before Cybertruck ships)

 

Body: 4 door supercab truck

Seating: 5-6

Frunk (front trunk)

LED light bar at body apex

 

Length: 231.7" (5.885m)

Width: 79.8" (2.027m)

Height: 75" (1.905m)

 

Bed: 6.5 feet (2m) x 57" (1.448m)

Under-bed storage locker

120/220 VAC power outlets

Air compressor 

Loading ramp deploys from the tail gate

Integrated tonneau cover

Option: tonneau solar array charging

 

Suspension: air adjustable/leveling

Wheels: 37" 

Ground clearance: 16" (0.406m)

Approach angle: 35°

Departure angle: 28°

 

Construction: 3mm thick triangular unibody using SpaceX's custom 30X cold-rolled stainless steel alloy. 

 

 

tesla-cybertruck-bed-cover.gif

1610970133_Cubertrucklightbar800.thumb.jpg.8c7aa3b56072672659a94435f66074ca.jpg

 

Screenshot_2019-11-22-00-51-03.thumb.jpeg.16ae42f92272820ecd14a56595180534.jpeg

 

Screenshot_2019-11-22-00-58-30.thumb.jpeg.4869bffb13516ef4f9837292cfb9df98.jpeg

 

Screenshot_2019-11-22-00-54-09.thumb.jpeg.88c3f91249edca5ffc72c5f21ec70008.jpeg

Edited by DocM
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1389505-tesla-cybertruck/
Share on other sites

Not a fan of the design. I love the way my F150 looks. I like squared and big.. but this goes a bit too far.

 

Also, quite curious to see how it performs in winter driving conditions especially where I live.  You pretty much HAVE to get a 4x4 truck here just due to the snow/ice.  If I don't put my truck in 4x4 I am not going anywhere.

 

If the Cybertruck performs the same then you are pretty much forced to buy the 4wd version.  I definitely like the concept of a Tesla Truck, though I wish it stuck to the standard truck design more.

Tesla's battery conditioning system is set up to work well in cold climates, set up to pre-warm or cool the cells as needed. Tested in an Alaskan cold weather testing facility also used by the US military.  They've also used an auto test site near Baudette, Minnesota - one of the coldest places in the lower 48.

 

Our grandson thinks it's a Batmobile candidate 

 

>250,000 pre-orders as of yesterday.

 

😁

 

 

For non-tweeters

 

IMG_20191128_163734.thumb.jpg.d351c1c39706ab41b6d0430c764ba8e9.jpg

Edited by DocM
4 minutes ago, Peresvet said:

I support the innovation, but let's be real and honest.

 

For $50-70K, I'd rather buy a BMW X5 or an Audi Q7.

It's obviously not targeting your demographic if those are the cars you're saying you would rather get. 

21 minutes ago, HoochieMamma said:

It's obviously not targeting your demographic if those are the cars you're saying you would rather get. 

If you say so.

 

Tesla must be targeting Potiac Aztek's demographic group because of its immense success....Oh, wait.

  • Facepalm 3
1 minute ago, Peresvet said:

If you say so.

 

Tesla must be targeting Potiac Aztek's demographic group because of its immense success....Oh, wait.

No, just flatbed trucks/utes/utility vehicles, not soccer mum cars like the BMW/Audi.

  • Like 3
On 11/24/2019 at 9:07 PM, DocM said:

That's what happens when a vehicle can lay down 1,000 lb-f (1,356 N-m) of torque from 0 RPM.

I'm not one to hate on Tesla like some other guys I've seen on this site, but that video was kinda bogus. Why only rear wheel drive? What were the configs of each?

 

None of it means anything otherwise. What will matter is apples to apples, between cost to performance you actually get. If they're using a high-end model of Cybertruck for example, then I really don't care if it can pull an F150 if the cost is twice that. If we're talking about $70k models for example, then let's look at what $70k gets you from both companies... which you're probably looking at an F350 or F450 at that point.

 

Also curious as to what they're doing regarding rear-view mirrors, as it seemed odd to not have them by design yet...

1 hour ago, Peresvet said:

I support the innovation, but let's be real and honest.

 

For $50-70K, I'd rather buy a BMW X5 or an Audi Q7.

or GLE.   However, this is a flatbed TRUCK.  Not an SUV!   If you are shopping for Q7 - drive Tesla model X instead - this is the competition.

 

 

i actually like the truck design, but I was into cyberpunk for years. CD Projekt should it this vehicle to the upcoming Cyberpunk 2077  😂  would be awesome to see Keanu Reeves drive this!!!

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1
6 hours ago, dead.cell said:

I'm not one to hate on Tesla like some other guys I've seen on this site, but that video was kinda bogus. Why only rear wheel drive? What were the configs of each?

 

None of it means anything otherwise. What will matter is apples to apples, between cost to performance you actually get.

 

It's mostly who is heaviest and has the largest tire contact patch area under sufficient power.

 

This was a mid-level Cybertruck running 35/12.5 skins, almost 800 lb-f of torque, and massing over 6,000 lbs.

 

Quote

If they're using a high-end model of Cybertruck for example, 

 

This was the mid-model; 2-motors, AWD, almost 800 lb-f of torque (from 0 RPM.)

 

The high end model uses the 3-motor AWD, which with the coming Plaid* upgrade will deliver about 1,000 lb-f (from 0 RPM.)

 

* Spaceballs reference, beyond Tesla's  'Ludicrous' power mode

Quote

then I really don't care if it can pull an F150 if the cost is twice that. If we're talking about $70k models for example, then let's look at what $70k gets you from both companies... which you're probably looking at an F350 or F450 at that point.

 

The mid-model 2-motor that spanked the F-150 is a friggin' monster at $49,990.

 

It also has off road features you'd normally pay extra for.

 

Quote

 

Also curious as to what they're doing regarding rear-view mirrors, as it seemed odd to not have them by design yet...

 

NHTSA is re-evaluating the use of video "mirrors" after petitions by an international group of automakers and Tesla. Europe and Asia are headed in that direction, so...

 

Cybertruck already feeds a rear-view  camera to a video "mirror" in the usual windshield location. This for when payload or the tonneau blocks the view.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
7 hours ago, HoochieMamma said:

No, just flatbed trucks/utes/utility vehicles, not soccer mum cars like the BMW/Audi.

Soccer moms in the midwestern US  drive SUV's and pickups. Those are the most popular vehicle segments. Ford is adding an electric crossover SUV to the Mustang stable.

11 hours ago, dead.cell said:

I'm not one to hate on Tesla like some other guys I've seen on this site, but that video was kinda bogus. Why only rear wheel drive? What were the configs of each?

 

None of it means anything otherwise. What will matter is apples to apples, between cost to performance you actually get. If they're using a high-end model of Cybertruck for example, then I really don't care if it can pull an F150 if the cost is twice that. If we're talking about $70k models for example, then let's look at what $70k gets you from both companies... which you're probably looking at an F350 or F450 at that point.

 

Also curious as to what they're doing regarding rear-view mirrors, as it seemed odd to not have them by design yet...

It was a pointless video.  I mean ... this was all about traction ... the Tesla is heavier and AWD while the F-150 was 2x4 and has most of its weight up front (not over the rear tires).  That video had nothing to do with torque or whatever ... 

 

I am curious why they didn't opt to use a 4x4 F-150 ... surely all four tires smoking would have made for better theatrics?  hmmm

 

With respect to the Tesla truck ... don't know if my opinion about any vehicle has wildly swung like a pendulum ... at first I disliked it ... then I kinda liked it ... after seeing some videos of it on the road I'm back to not liking it (the looks).  Might look good with a matte black paint job...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!