Recommended Posts

On 03/12/2023 at 02:08, adrynalyne said:

, you don't go shooting up a vehicle unless you know  it is bullet proof. 

They gained that knowledge when somebody decided to shoot a 9 mm at a piece of Starship steel.

Putting a piece of metal behind a target is a thing, the Starships are built in Texas, and one of the properties they purchased at Boca Chica (AKA Starbase) was Massey's gun range, but above all the metal has the properties they needed to make Cybertruck capable of off-roading. 

On 03/12/2023 at 22:18, DocM said:

They gained that knowledge when somebody decided to shoot a 9 mm at a piece of Starship steel.

Putting a piece of metal behind a target is a thing, the Starships are built in Texas, and one of the properties they purchased at Boca Chica (AKA Starbase) was Massey's gun range, but above all the metal has the properties they needed to make Cybertruck capable of off-roading. 

You have proven my point. 

On 04/12/2023 at 01:24, adrynalyne said:

You have proven my point. 

Only from your point of view. The choice of the strongest stainless steel was for safety reasons, it's what they do. When the model S was made and tested for roof crush do you think they intentionally made it to break the machine (which it did)? 

Earlier I mentioned the IDRA (Italy) Giga Press for casting frame halves.

Recently Ford, Hyundai, and Toyota have announced that they are pursuing this technology.

Giga Press is currently in use on Model Y and Cybertruck for front and rear frame segments, 6000 and 9000 metric ton clamping force machines respectively. Their next generation of vehicles will use a 12,000 metric ton unit to cast a frame in a single piece.

The battery is structural and goes between frame halves or becomes the floor of a single piece frame. 

This video is a little dated, but better than most...

Model Y casting halves with a structural battery

tesla_model_y_structural_battery_0.thumb.jpg.dcab064c6d74b7287ef80e962cc68a27.jpg

On 04/12/2023 at 01:01, DocM said:

Only from your point of view. The choice of the strongest stainless steel was for safety reasons, it's what they do. When the model S was made and tested for roof crush do you think they intentionally made it to break the machine (which it did)? 

Earlier I mentioned the IDRA (Italy) Giga Press for casting frame halves.

Recently Ford, Hyundai, and Toyota have announced that they are pursuing this technology.

Giga Press is currently in use on Model Y and Cybertruck for front and rear frame segments, 6000 and 9000 metric ton clamping force machines respectively. Their next generation of vehicles will use a 12,000 metric ton unit to cast a frame in a single piece.

The battery is structural and goes between frame halves or becomes the floor of a single piece frame. 

This video is a little dated, but better than most...

Model Y casting halves with a structural battery

tesla_model_y_structural_battery_0.thumb.jpg.dcab064c6d74b7287ef80e962cc68a27.jpg

It’s the only point I have been discussing from, so yeah. 

On 02/12/2023 at 19:02, adrynalyne said:

Thats a load of crap. You don't accidently make something bullet proof. People don't go around shooting cars as part of their testing process unless it was intentionally bullet proof.

No, it's absolutely true.

They literally stated this.  It's not completely bulletproof, but its an unintended property of the metal that was designed.

It's just where people's minds go when they see a huge metal car.  They're used to plastic honda's, not tanks.  So as such, the question is always raised.  

It sounds to me like they over-engineered the chassis and maybe should have looked at ways to reduce the cost by using a different material.  Using stainless steel designed for a rocket is pretty overkill, and having the production price being almost twice the initial estimate doesn't look good.
They're late to the game and the entry price is $10,000 above the F-150 Lightning.

It's too expensive and stands out too much.  Every kid in the neighborhood is going to perform flying karate kicks on it to "test" its strength.

On 04/12/2023 at 08:44, mram said:

No, it's absolutely true.

They literally stated this.  It's not completely bulletproof, but its an unintended property of the metal that was designed.

It's just where people's minds go when they see a huge metal car.  They're used to plastic honda's, not tanks.  So as such, the question is always raised.  

No, its not, regardless of what they stated.

They chose the material KNOWING it was bullet proof then used that "feature" to market it further. Which is fine, but come on, that was not unintended. Unintended is when you smash an "un-smashable" window during a demonstration.

 

From the head on crash test, I think I would feel more alive afterwards in that plastic Honda.

Edited by adrynalyne
On 04/12/2023 at 08:49, adrynalyne said:

No, its not, regardless of what they stated.

They chose the material KNOWING it was bullet proof then used that "feature" to market it further.

They didn't choose the material, they designed it.  it wasn't like a color wheel at Home Depot.  It's a structural support exoskeleton frame that was created, something not done typically with consumer vehicles.

It is incidental that it has other properties.  It has to be strong for its designed purpose.  It might be strong enough for other purposes.  This is for funsies.  That's kind of what Tesla has been known for.

First 45 seconds from the Tesla engineer: "Obviously we didn't design it to be bulletproof, but if it works out..."

Lets see what it is like in the real world, not the favorable paces that all car companies showcase. Personally, I still think it is fugly.

I would not want to test how well it takes a shot in the real world.

On 04/12/2023 at 10:44, mram said:

No, it's absolutely true.

They literally stated this.  It's not completely bulletproof, but its an unintended property of the metal that was designed.

It's just where people's minds go when they see a huge metal car.  They're used to plastic honda's, not tanks.  So as such, the question is always raised.  

Not to mention people who try to shoot up junkers, law enforcement agencies who test tactical ammunition against vehicles to see if they'll go through the bodies and window glass (often the answer is no - laminated glass is very tough), etc. 

Sometimes manufacturers will put vehicles through torture testing which includes guns, Tesla has a orders for Cybertruck from police agencies, including Latin America. Even corporate security is looking at it, one example being Oracle.

Edited by DocM
On 04/12/2023 at 22:29, DocM said:

Not to mention people who try to shoot up junkers, law enforcement agencies who test tactical ammunition against vehicles to see if they'll go through the bodies and window glass (often the answer is no - laminated glass is very tough), etc. 

Sometimes manufacturers will put vehicles through torture testing which includes guns, Tesla has a orders for Cybertruck from police agencies, including Latin America. Even corporate security is looking at it, one example being Oracle.

Looking forward to when NHTSA adds "shooting vehicles" that part of their safety testing. /s

On 05/12/2023 at 08:16, Warwagon said:

People either HATE  the Cybertruck or LOVE the Cybertruck. I'm on the LOVE side. If I was rich i'd buy one!

It's meh. Would rather have an F150 Lightning or Rivian if I was in the market for an EV truck..

On 05/12/2023 at 08:47, primortal said:

Looking forward to when NHTSA adds "shooting vehicles" that part of their safety testing. /s

Automakers which make police vehicles do destructive testing - often in conjunction with police agencies. Some of the most grueling tests are done by the Michigan State Police.  FBI does a lot of tactical ammunition tests, determining which penetrate laminated glass and other barriers the best.

Top Gear does Cybertruck

 

On 05/12/2023 at 11:00, tsupersonic said:

It's meh. Would rather have an F150 Lightning or Rivian if I was in the market for an EV truck..

I go for the one with a more HIGHEST SPEC 240v utility power/bidirectional charging F-150 Lightning is 9.6 KW, Cybertruck is 11.5 KW. I also like the under the bed tool box, fold down back seats, and steel power tonneau cover. 

On 05/12/2023 at 09:02, DocM said:

Automakers which make police vehicles do destructive testing - often in conjunction with police agencies. Some of the most grueling tests are done by the Michigan State Police.  FBI does a lot of tactical ammunition tests, determining which penetrate laminated glass and other barriers the best.

Top Gear does Cybertruck

 

I'm sure we will see these as police vehicles any day now.

On 05/12/2023 at 12:43, adrynalyne said:

I'm sure we will see these as police vehicles any day now.

 

LEOs have ordered it, and last September Larry Ellison announced Oracle's public safety division has ported their LEO software to Cybertruck. It's already deployed in other Teslas.

On 06/12/2023 at 17:33, DocM said:

There were hints something like this was coming.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-michigan-speech-autoworkers-electric-boat-rant-1234833784/

But trump told us EV's and water combined would get us killed.  This was only a couple months ago too.

 

Are you saying he's wrong?

  • Haha 2
On 07/12/2023 at 10:03, DeathLace said:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-michigan-speech-autoworkers-electric-boat-rant-1234833784/

But trump told us EV's and water combined would get us killed.  This was only a couple months ago too.

 

Are you saying he's wrong?

I'll take ectrocution over sharks any day

On 12/12/2023 at 11:30, primortal said:

 

Checked around and it sounds like it had a pre-release software version which affected the all-wheel drive. Fixed.

Meanwhile, Ford has cut in half their production of the F-150 Lightning. One factor may be customers made  Lightning orders as a hedge against their Cybertruck order. Other possibilities are  that Cybertruck has a larger bed, and more power from its bi-directional 240vac socket.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with ad blockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Samsung Browser'. It has very little bloat and is a nice-looking web browser with an inbuilt 'Ad blocker'. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. This browser can also install Chrome extensions. I have a system wide Ad blocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the web browser, but over the whole system. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt ad blocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!