Recommended Posts

Its because it doesn't decrease. Consider it your permanent record.

I don't think that it's fair the xStainDx keeps a warning of 40% when he has been a long standing member, eg: A member that has got 40% in two days is a lot worse than someone that has got 40% in two years.

There should be a forgiveness system (eg: -1% every two weeks of good behavior) to prevent such long standing members from getting high warnings for something that they did a long time ago, how else are we meant to learn from our mistakes? even the prison system releases prisoners after an amount of time so they can learn from their mistakes and try again, Even if they further abuse the system.

My No means does lowering the warning level mean erasing perminent records, but the warning level shouldn't be held against them in the amount of tolerence they have left for such a long period of time.

I don't think that it's fair the xStainDx keeps a warning of 40% when he has been a long standing member, eg: A member that has got 40% in two days is a lot worse than someone that has got 40% in two years.

There should be a forgiveness system (eg: -1% every two weeks of good behavior) to prevent such long standing members from getting high warnings for something that they did a long time ago, how else are we meant to learn from our mistakes? even the prison system releases prisoners after an amount of time so they can learn from their mistakes and try again, Even if they further abuse the system.

My No means does lowering the warning level mean erasing perminent records, but the warning level shouldn't be held against them in the amount of tolerence they have left for such a long period of time.

Very true - there's practically no point in having the system if people can't bellowed to learn from their mistakes.

It doesn't go down. Its your permanent record. Whether or not anyone deserves it, flaming is against the neowin rules.

If you don't want it to continue going up, obey the rules :)

That just puts too much power into the hands of mods. Neowin shouldn't subscribe to that. The policy should be that after a time warnings can drop off your record like speeding tickets do.

I can't believe that having this upsets people. No one was upset that it's been on their account for as long as 1.3 has been out. The only person who can see you level, besides staff, is you. Why get worked up over this?

I think a lot of people didn't know that such a structured warning system existed. :/

I wonder who has the highest warning percentage without being banned yet?

And I feel like starting a new thread about what the warning system is just for the great reactions that Silly and Spydie have been giving to merging them all. Good work guys. (Y)

Nobody's getting worked up.... except that WC guy.... it's just that xStainDx deserves to be allowed to flame 5 more times instead of 3 before he would get banned for being such a fantastic member this far! :o :p

HAHAHAHAHAHA :laugh:

HAHHAHAHAHAHA :woot:

I can't believe that having this upsets people. No one was upset that it's been on their account for as long as 1.3 has been out. The only person who can see you level, besides staff, is you. Why get worked up over this?

But it was activated now. That what concerns a lot of people. It wasnt there when older version of IPB were installed. No 1 cared but now that Redmak has activated it, it opens up a Pandora's box.

Yeah lots of people want to know why their accounts were warned without notification. It seems not to be just 1 or 2.. Sounds typical..

It was better off without the thing. Close pandora's box. :yes:

better yet, wipe the slate clean so people can feel less intimidated by the whole thing. Then keep the warning level as an option that members enable. that woudl be the professional way to handle this situation.

But it was activated now. That what concerns a lot of people. It wasnt there when older version of IPB were installed. No 1 cared but now that Redmak has activated it, it opens up a Pandora's box.

The only thing activated is your ability to see it. Staff always have seen it. Your ability to see it changes what again?

The only thing activated is your ability to see it. Staff always have seen it. Your ability to see it changes what again?

The fact that now every1 has to watch what they post so that they dont want a warning seems to be a bit rough on them. Not that Neowin hasnt been a top quality forum but the fact that now posts have to be worded carefully seems to curtail a genuine opinion/anger that can originate based on a stupid comment/post.

I dont care about the warning signs. Basically, I think it helps to keep our words in check and also less work for you guys to warn becoz i think it can restrict unnecessary words and make a person think before they post (yup, sucking upto you ;) ). However if this is what is needed to make Neowin a much better-than-currently-a top forum, then I'm all up for it. :yes:

The fact that now every1 has to watch what they post so that they dont want a warning seems to be a bit rough on them. Not that Neowin hasnt been a top quality forum but the fact that now posts have to be worded carefully seems to curtail a genuine opinion/anger that can originate based on a stupid comment/post.

This is horse-pockey. The system was in place before. People got warned before. We knew about it before. The Rules page existed before today, and all of the rules that are posted in it. I repeat, the only thing that changed is the little 0% under your details.

BTW, many other IPB sites show members the Warn Bar. It's not like Neowin hacked this feature in just to **** you guys off.

This is horse-pockey. The system was in place before. People got warned before. We knew about it before. The Rules page existed before today, and all of the rules that are posted in it. I repeat, the only thing that changed is the little 0% under your details.

BTW, many other IPB sites show members the Warn Bar. It's not like Neowin hacked this feature in just to **** you guys off.

Yes but the perception changes when you can see your own warning slider. When the slider was absent, a lot of people posted stuff against the rules. True, some people could care jack**** about the slider even now but it would enforce some kind of restraint (internally) among posters who sincerely follow rules or want to.

Again, a reiteration from my previous post

if this is what is needed to make Neowin a much better-than-currently-a top forum, then I'm all up for it.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Thank god they got rid of the disgusting looking sidebars, and the corner radius looks much better, too. Two things I hated on day one, and never got used to.
    • JetBrains launches Rider 2026.2 EAP 5, bringing several AI improvements by David Uzondu JetBrains has released the fifth EAP version of Rider 2026.2, bringing a faster startup flow with the new non-modal startup screen and quality-check hooks for Claude Code and Codex. In the latest EAP release, Rider now has newly bundled "quality-check" hooks that run background tests on code edits before the external agent proceeds. For example, after Claude Code rewrites a class, Rider immediately triggers a PostToolUse hook that analyzes the code for syntax errors and formatting warnings. It then passes those findings back to the model as feedback, allowing the agent to fix its own output before finalizing the task. If Rider detects compilation errors, the IDE prevents the agent from treating the task as complete, while minor formatting warnings simply help guide the model toward better output. The "Explain with AI" feature can now tackle tricky build errors directly from the console, helping .NET developers who frequently wrestle with multi-targeting failures and MSBuild errors. JetBrains introduced Explain with AI back in the 2024.1 release cycle. With this feature, instead of forcing developers to copy long diagnostics into a separate chat window, Rider now lets you trigger these explanations directly from the error source. In similar EAP news, JetBrains recently opened the first EAP for IntelliJ IDEA 2026.2, with features that appeal to both those who are into AI-assisted coding and those who prefer "classic" manual development. For manual developers, the release adds revamped dependency completion for Maven and Gradle build scripts, which pulls data directly from the local cache to suggest relevant versions. It also brings the Spring Debugger update, displaying security indicators next to endpoints to visualize secured routes during runtime. In addition to database migration tools for Flyway and Liquibase, this build introduces a Hibernate debugger that shows the exact SQL or HQL queries that the framework plans to execute, letting developers jump directly to the Java code that triggered them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      223
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      80
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!