Neowin's NHL 2004 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread


Recommended Posts

damn, the stars won?? i thought it was over and turned it off...oh well...

I was thinking the samething, so I switched to the blues/sharks game. the showed updates to the avs/stars game and switched back over to that game and watched the rest of it. the avs did a bad job of defending their lead.

lol gotta love NHL fans.. Predators chanting "Red Wings" then moments later " YOU SUCK!" haha

2-0 Preds, Detroit really needs to get back home in this series.

edit- sp.. hopefully neowin clears up soon, took like 10 minutes trying to edit this :/

Edited by myie2_user
That bruins win was total BULL****!!! Anyone who believes otherwise plays too much junior b.

Raycroft did an AMAZING job though. He basically won the game all by himself.

The habs missed SO MANY opportunities its not even funny. They should have won by at least 2goals. And at the end... omg. That guy should have had a penality for that hit on kovalev.

That bruins win was total BULL****!!! Anyone who believes otherwise plays too much junior b.

Montreal deserved the loss.

1) They were within 30 seconds on winning the game in regulation at home. They needed to shut the Bruins down with the extra attacker and they didn't.

2) Kovalev should know by now that not all penalties are called in OT and not all penalties are called in the playoffs and thus not that many penalties at all are called in a playoff OT period.

3) Kovalev further needs to be tough enough to deal with a slash without skating into his own teammate and creating the keystone cops situation that led the Murray's OT winner.

4) No team should allow Kovalev to be the furthest man back. Especially in OT.

Montreal deserved the loss.

1) They were within 30 seconds on winning the game in regulation at home. They needed to shut the Bruins down with the extra attacker and they didn't.

2) Kovalev should know by now that not all penalties are called in OT and not all penalties are called in the playoffs and thus not that many penalties at all are called in a playoff OT period.

3) Kovalev further needs to be tough enough to deal with a slash without skating into his own teammate and creating the keystone cops situation that led the Murray's OT winner.

4) No team should allow Kovalev to be the furthest man back. Especially in OT.

im a montreal fan, but i beleive you're right. They totally deserve what they got. A goalie can be the best in the world, but to miss on so many damn opportunities is ur damn fault, i dont care if ur Mario or Gretzky or Howe... if u cant capatalize on your chances then it doesnt matter how close you were.

well i JUST saw the replay, it looked pretty bad... even if u get slashed on ur glove, it still hurts like a bitch, especially when kovalev and whoever slashed him were going in completely opposite directions. I'd blame Souray more than Kovalev, he shoulda had his head up. Kovalev was going at a snails pace.

Oh well... i hope we have better luck next year. I was only really impressed with our team twice this year. The first time we beat Toronto and that ~12game unbeaten streak

Oh well... i hope we have better luck next year. I was only really impressed with our team twice this year. The first time we beat Toronto and that ~12game unbeaten streak

dont give up yet.. its not over til its over.. anything can happen in the playoffs

yeah, montreal definitely deserved that loss.. that stunt kovalev pulled was total BS. the stick barely hit him.. and it hit him on the glove.. gimme a break dude. Serves him right.

I have to agree 110%. Kovalev was looking for another penalty in overtime. I was happy to see both Surray and Claude Julian say that he was guilty of giving up and that he should have continued through it.

I'd blame Souray more than Kovalev, he shoulda had his head up. Kovalev was going at a snails pace.

I don't. Kovalev had his head down and turned up ice, right into Souray. I don't think that Souray expected his own player to skate right into him.

"He (Kovalev) says he got slashed. Well, yeah, but do you stop playing? It's double overtime, (the referees) are going to let you play at that point. It's just frustrating that this happened right now, in this game. I thought we played well enough to win."
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...id=968867503640

In doubt OT, you have to play through some things. During the Leafs-Sens game, Tucker got plastered against the boards in the dying seconds but he got up and did the best he could until the buzzer when he collapsed.

Tucker is the perfect example of playing through pain. Just look at his face. :punch:

sucks what kovalev did. i saw the replay and it didn't look like it hurt that much. *shrug*

as for the red wings, i hope joseph plays game 5. it will give detroit a bit of a boost, i think.

edit: looks like cujo is starting game 5. :yes:

well, i picked the canucks to make the finals.. but i'm kinda starting to lean toward the flames in the first round.. former atlanta team.. and gotta love an underdog.. i still think the bruins will win it all

;) Lots of room on the bandwagon.

:woot: Still say Flames in six :woot:

:unsure: Still a lot of teams they have to go through,(Boston)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!