Recommended Posts

this is a joke, right?

ok, then, where did the plane that was high jacked go? planes that make crash landings and do not survive leave marks, notice how all those wreckage photos where in realitively clear fields.

could a plane leave such precise holes?: can a missle? the plane obviously slide through the pentagon before exploding, leaving holes the size of an airplane's body.

videos taken: the FBI wanted to find out all the information they could, they had to get the info as soon as they could to start the investigation. also for the wreckage, watch the planes hit the WTC, they exploded and didn't leave wreckage, they burst into complete flames.

sounded like a missle?: oh, so they know what a plane going at high speed a few feet from the ground sounds like? the plane was probably going 3x the speed of a landing plane, so it would "sound" faster than a regular plane approaching an airport.

the guy couldn't fly in his lessons?: he had to crash a plane, you don't need to know flying that well to crash...

they saw military jets/personal planes: WOW! planes over D.C., no way.

left nothing on the grass?: it hit the building....

intact rolls of wire: they were metal, metal doesn't catch fire, and i just established it didn't hit the ground, so why would those catch fire?

intact windows: honestly, I don't see how those are windows intact, but how would a missle leave windows intact anyway

how could ANYONE believe this?

Edited by JK1150

Here is the best thing for that unruly, but well made piece of propaganda:

"Planes *mess up* the ground" (nice description)

The people who said they 'heard' a missle . . . I wonder how many missles they have actually heard before.

There are also a group of people who think that Bush detonated an atomic weapon at the WTC site, and the planes were just a front.

site

IT is weird and suspicious evidence though. Personally I think th eplane that went doen in Pennsylvania field was shot down.

:no:

But, as has already been said: flight 77 did take off, and there were people on it. Where did all of those people go?
also, moved to area 51

Maybe the plane went to area 51

doesnt it make ya wonder? But then again I know this hit a federal office but wouldnt the FAA be the ones to confisicate the videos? since it would be part of their investigation.... but then again like the 9/11 commision said the gov't agencies arent working together. They should make another gov't buearu called The United States: Federal Buearu of Truth. LOL :D :sleep:

What an oxymoron

Interesting flash video, even more interesting is that the FBI allegedly confiscated all known videos in the vicinity of the Pentagon and have yet to be released.

Would like to see that security video in higher quality to make the distinction of it either being a plane or a missile.

Radish?

the god damn plane hit the building and caught fire where the hell do you think it went? what do you think was on fire for a day or two? just like the WTC the heat from the everyburing melted the supports which caused the collapse of the buildings...same heat in the pentagon wreckage, dont you think the less tuff metal of the airplane melted or burned? The windows....they aren't regular windows in you house...they are at least 2 feet thick

This is probably one of the stupidest conspiracy theories I have ever heard.

The planes that were used were selected beforehand because they had been -fully fueled- and would still have most of that fuel onboard when they struck their intended target. Essentially the planes would be flying fuel-air bombs when they hit, and it would vaporize most of the debris in the gigantic fireball explosion that everyone saw when the WTC got hit. So yeah, maybe it could have sounded like a bomb or missle going off...but how many people have heard what a few thousand pounds of jet fuel sounds like when it is ignited? Probably like a BIG EXPLOSION! Duh!

I'm sorry, but if you believe any of this crap, you're a moron. Seriously. I can entertain a lot of the other conspiracy theories about Bush and all that other rot, and agree some of it is plausible, but there is NO reason for them to stage the hijacking of an aircraft loaded with civilians, make it seem as though the plane crashes into the Pentagon, when in reality it was hit by a secret, unseen missle, then they turn around and make all those people and that plane vanish? What the hell would be the point of any of that, especially when they have a plane they now need to get rid of anyways?? Use a little common sense...sheesh.

An airplane does disappear if it wasn't a plane, but rather...a missile. Go to www.thisiswhoweare.com and www.911timeline.net. I, myself believe the government did it (probably gonna get a bunch of people mad now :unsure:).

Why you ask? Well...put yourself in to the position of a terrorist. Your main goal is to inflict damage on a mass scale and to cause fear and terror. Now...would you rather hit the WTC, the Pentagon, and potentially another target in Washington D.C., or a nuclear power plant 20 or so miles from NYC, thus causing damage on a large scale while in posession of large planes? Well, of course you would hit the nuclear power plant and cause a meltdown, you're a terrorist!

But...this would not be wise to do to your own people if the government was behind it. Hit the nuclear power plant, kill millions of innocent Americans and damage prime land for years and causing fallout over a wide range. Or....being the government, they could hit the WTC, the Pentagon (on the side that was being worked on, go figure), and crash a plane into a Penn. field, and cover it all up since it will be a federal investigation, not allowing the FAA or other lower organizations to investigate, and get away with it.

In the WTC, the FBI and CIA had offices, unofficially. A member of the CIA, who was pretty high, quit the CIA 2 days before 9/11 and was in the WTC during the incedent. The Pentagon was hit on the side which was being redone, I find that very odd, since that part of the Pentagon was not important.

Why? Because, fear gains control. You put fear into a major situation, and people won't question you. Only the smart will refuse to fear and will question.

And the jet fuel could not have melted or destroyed all the debris, no matter what, nor destroy the steel beams (which melt at very very high temps, higher than those cause by exploding jet fuel) in the WTC.

I have more...I'm too tired to put it all. I could argue with someone over this for years, but I won't. We all have our opinions on this, and I like to keep it that way.

We all have our opinions on this, and I like to keep it that way.

I have my opinion on this issue as well. You're an idiot.

Now what was the point in calling him an idiot?

You should have just left it alone and stuck to your opinion - no need to be nasty.

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!