Recommended Posts

this is a joke, right?

ok, then, where did the plane that was high jacked go? planes that make crash landings and do not survive leave marks, notice how all those wreckage photos where in realitively clear fields.

could a plane leave such precise holes?: can a missle? the plane obviously slide through the pentagon before exploding, leaving holes the size of an airplane's body.

videos taken: the FBI wanted to find out all the information they could, they had to get the info as soon as they could to start the investigation. also for the wreckage, watch the planes hit the WTC, they exploded and didn't leave wreckage, they burst into complete flames.

sounded like a missle?: oh, so they know what a plane going at high speed a few feet from the ground sounds like? the plane was probably going 3x the speed of a landing plane, so it would "sound" faster than a regular plane approaching an airport.

the guy couldn't fly in his lessons?: he had to crash a plane, you don't need to know flying that well to crash...

they saw military jets/personal planes: WOW! planes over D.C., no way.

left nothing on the grass?: it hit the building....

intact rolls of wire: they were metal, metal doesn't catch fire, and i just established it didn't hit the ground, so why would those catch fire?

intact windows: honestly, I don't see how those are windows intact, but how would a missle leave windows intact anyway

how could ANYONE believe this?

Edited by JK1150

Here is the best thing for that unruly, but well made piece of propaganda:

"Planes *mess up* the ground" (nice description)

The people who said they 'heard' a missle . . . I wonder how many missles they have actually heard before.

There are also a group of people who think that Bush detonated an atomic weapon at the WTC site, and the planes were just a front.

site

IT is weird and suspicious evidence though. Personally I think th eplane that went doen in Pennsylvania field was shot down.

:no:

But, as has already been said: flight 77 did take off, and there were people on it. Where did all of those people go?
also, moved to area 51

Maybe the plane went to area 51

doesnt it make ya wonder? But then again I know this hit a federal office but wouldnt the FAA be the ones to confisicate the videos? since it would be part of their investigation.... but then again like the 9/11 commision said the gov't agencies arent working together. They should make another gov't buearu called The United States: Federal Buearu of Truth. LOL :D :sleep:

What an oxymoron

Interesting flash video, even more interesting is that the FBI allegedly confiscated all known videos in the vicinity of the Pentagon and have yet to be released.

Would like to see that security video in higher quality to make the distinction of it either being a plane or a missile.

Radish?

the god damn plane hit the building and caught fire where the hell do you think it went? what do you think was on fire for a day or two? just like the WTC the heat from the everyburing melted the supports which caused the collapse of the buildings...same heat in the pentagon wreckage, dont you think the less tuff metal of the airplane melted or burned? The windows....they aren't regular windows in you house...they are at least 2 feet thick

This is probably one of the stupidest conspiracy theories I have ever heard.

The planes that were used were selected beforehand because they had been -fully fueled- and would still have most of that fuel onboard when they struck their intended target. Essentially the planes would be flying fuel-air bombs when they hit, and it would vaporize most of the debris in the gigantic fireball explosion that everyone saw when the WTC got hit. So yeah, maybe it could have sounded like a bomb or missle going off...but how many people have heard what a few thousand pounds of jet fuel sounds like when it is ignited? Probably like a BIG EXPLOSION! Duh!

I'm sorry, but if you believe any of this crap, you're a moron. Seriously. I can entertain a lot of the other conspiracy theories about Bush and all that other rot, and agree some of it is plausible, but there is NO reason for them to stage the hijacking of an aircraft loaded with civilians, make it seem as though the plane crashes into the Pentagon, when in reality it was hit by a secret, unseen missle, then they turn around and make all those people and that plane vanish? What the hell would be the point of any of that, especially when they have a plane they now need to get rid of anyways?? Use a little common sense...sheesh.

An airplane does disappear if it wasn't a plane, but rather...a missile. Go to www.thisiswhoweare.com and www.911timeline.net. I, myself believe the government did it (probably gonna get a bunch of people mad now :unsure:).

Why you ask? Well...put yourself in to the position of a terrorist. Your main goal is to inflict damage on a mass scale and to cause fear and terror. Now...would you rather hit the WTC, the Pentagon, and potentially another target in Washington D.C., or a nuclear power plant 20 or so miles from NYC, thus causing damage on a large scale while in posession of large planes? Well, of course you would hit the nuclear power plant and cause a meltdown, you're a terrorist!

But...this would not be wise to do to your own people if the government was behind it. Hit the nuclear power plant, kill millions of innocent Americans and damage prime land for years and causing fallout over a wide range. Or....being the government, they could hit the WTC, the Pentagon (on the side that was being worked on, go figure), and crash a plane into a Penn. field, and cover it all up since it will be a federal investigation, not allowing the FAA or other lower organizations to investigate, and get away with it.

In the WTC, the FBI and CIA had offices, unofficially. A member of the CIA, who was pretty high, quit the CIA 2 days before 9/11 and was in the WTC during the incedent. The Pentagon was hit on the side which was being redone, I find that very odd, since that part of the Pentagon was not important.

Why? Because, fear gains control. You put fear into a major situation, and people won't question you. Only the smart will refuse to fear and will question.

And the jet fuel could not have melted or destroyed all the debris, no matter what, nor destroy the steel beams (which melt at very very high temps, higher than those cause by exploding jet fuel) in the WTC.

I have more...I'm too tired to put it all. I could argue with someone over this for years, but I won't. We all have our opinions on this, and I like to keep it that way.

We all have our opinions on this, and I like to keep it that way.

I have my opinion on this issue as well. You're an idiot.

Now what was the point in calling him an idiot?

You should have just left it alone and stuck to your opinion - no need to be nasty.

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!