Dell UltraSharp 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD


Recommended Posts

New 2005FPW Deal (hopefully this hasn't already been posted):

2005 FPW Link

Use 40% off coupon code: 6WZ30DBFL14P2W

$60 off $500 code: FKPVH8KZFHDJT?

Base Price: $699

40% off code: -$279.60

$60 off code: -$60

=$359.40

http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthread.ph...&postid=0#post0

So i just got it in today. Amazing. I'm not seeing any dead pixels, nor backlight bleed. However, it's day time, and i'm not super anal about a dead pixel that i wont notice 95% of the time.

Question: How do i know what revision and the born on date is? I know it's been posted before, but when it's a 130 page thread, it gets to be a long read (yes, i read it all).

Edit: Nevermind, i'm an idiot. I got a A02, July 05.

Edit 2: I shall post up a review in a little bit, after i've experianced the monitor w/ both day and night ambient conditions. However, after playing UT04 w/ widescreen, and all the visual effects on full, i cannot believe the picture quality on this monitor. The shadows, the reflections on the cannons, etc.

Edited by LBraasch
When I play a widescreen DVD on my 2005FPW, it doesn't fill the width of the screen.  Instead, there's bars on both the sides, and the top/bottom of the movie, as opposed to just the thin bars on the top/bottom.  I've tried w/multiple widescreen DVDs and all yield the same result.  How can I get my DVDs to show up like Finding Nemo did in the first post of this thread?

586250953[/snapback]

Another possible solution/issue. You might be trying to watch a non-anamorphic widescreen movie. Early DVD's had bars matted onto the top and bottom to make them format a 4:3 screen. When played on a 16:9, the DVD software inserts bars at the side to make it fit. The solution is to do a ZOOM on the DVD, or purchase a newer Anamorphic print...

Ok, so i'm having a problem. When playing dvd's, i still get the wide black bars, vs. the thin ones shown in the screen shots. However, when in the dvd menu, it gives me the nice thin ones. Why does it go to the thicker ones when the movie plays? I have the monitor set to "aspect".

I just call dell for a refund and they give me a DPS number with shipping back address... here is my question...

I order the monitor on 7/11/2005 so this 7/31 will be the end of my 21 days... i will ship out the monitor tommorrow which is 7/29 leaving me with 2 more days

till my 21 days end.. but usps don't ship on weekends so even if it reach dell, it have been over 21 days already, will they still give me a refund...

and beside, how does Dell RMA number works? their RMA# will only last 5 days but do they count weekends as those 5 days too? and when does it actually start? does the 5 days begin after the day i call for it or start from the date that they create it...

Edited by lanvo

Hi, I've just bought one of these babies from the US, and I'd like to know something about the powersupply.

You see, I live in Australia, a our voltages are different(ours is around 220v), so I'll need to get some sort of replacement cord or an adaptor.

Now what I need to know it what sort of power supply this monitor uses; an external powersupply, or on that's built into the monitor. If it's a built in one, does it have a 110/220v switch.

I'm hoping I won't have to buy a 220>110 transformer, cause those things are meant ot be expensive. :(

Thanks in advance. :D

Hi, i have some question about Dell RMA procedure...

I order a Dell 2005FPW LCD Monitor on 7/11/2005 and so tommorrow my 21 days policy for a refund will end which is on the 7/31/2005... So if I call Dell today to get me an RMA number for a refund. Do you

think that it is still possible for me to do that? I meant, today and tommorrow is weekends so there is no way that i can send the monitor to them becuase all postal service around

my area is close. So the only way i can ship the package to them is on this Monday, but this monday which is 8/01/2005 is my 22 days of ordering the monitor which means it has passed the

time period for a 21 days return policy...

Can anyone make sure for me that they will still give me a refund for this?

Ok, so i've had this monitor for a little over a day now, so here are some of the impressions thus far...

Opening the box:

People complained about the box. The box is brown, it says dell, it is thick cardboard that doesn't break. It's dell, not apple. Money spent on a fancy box is reflected on the customer spending more on products. I paid for a monitor, not a fancy box that holds a montior. When you open the first flaps of the box, there are instructions printed on the box, showing you how to remove the montior from the box. Nice. There is a large colorful "quick setup" guide, and a paper booklet which appears to be about warrentee information and stuch, but really is just disclaimers in about 5 languages. Disregaurd it.

The monitor and stand attach very easily, and as previously noted, the vga cable is already attached to the monitor, and the usb, dvi, and power cable are bagged. It took me maybe 5 minutes to assemble the monitor to my liking. I hooked everythign up, and the screen came to life. I waited about 2 minutes, and my videocard appeared w/ the new resolution, and i was in widescreen bliss.

Performance:

I hooked my keyboard and mouse via the back of the monitor and they seem to be running just fine, no lag nothing. I also tried out w/ usb external drive w/ no failure. I used the side ports to upload images from my digital camera, worked fine, speeds seemed normal.

Running photoshop and music editing programs are bliss. Althoguh i'm coming from 1400x1050 resolution, i have to say that the extra width is quite nice.

I usually don't play games, but i figured i'd download demos of HL2 and UT2004 just for kicks, as they support widescreen. I set all the settings to the highest level, and went from there. W/ zero lag, and zero ghosting, i can honestly say i want to buy HL2. Widescreen picture makes you feel like you're in the game.

I downloaded some HDWMV's to see how it would look. Again, no dissapointments. As we speak, i've just ordered the T2 "extreme dvd" which has a bonus disc w/ the movie encoded in HDWMV.

I was a little dissapointed w/ the dvd playback quality. The colors are right, but it's a little grainy. When talking with someone about it who also has the montior said it has to do with something in the mechanics of the monitor. Something about overdrive. It went completely over my head, but he seemed pretty sure about it, and said that it only occures on this monitor w/ mpeg2 video. I dunno.

For kicks, i hooked up my vcr into the composite input to try out the pip. Pip is nice if you don't have a tv in the room, and would still like to watch the news or something, however i wouldn't really use it for anything else, at least on the 20". I feel like dell added this feature to use as a selling point, neither picture by picture or picture in picture is super useful. I have a tv in same room, so i doubt the composite and s-video inputs will be getting much use.

Quality/Fit/Finish

I got a A02 made in July 05. Zero dead pixels, and a very VERY minimal amount of backlight bleed, which really only can be seen when the screen is compeltely black, and it's pitch black in the room. If you're so much as watching a movie on the screen, you will not notice it. I've had zero problems w/ the monitor thus far, and have to say dell sure did pick up the pieces on this monitor, and appearingly fixed the quality controll issues. I feel like majority of the problems was in the A00 series, and once upgraded, a lot of the problems went away.

My modded Dell 2005FPW:

To prevent further backlight leakage getting worse and to prevent the heat from getting to hot, i added an 80mm computer case fan to the back

of my Dell 2005FPW!!! :D anyways, its really hot to get the strings though the back of this monitor though hehe :Ds...

picture3662oz.jpg

and this method really works!!! no more heat whatsoever when i touch the back of htis monitor!!!

My modded Dell 2005FPW:

To prevent further backlight leakage getting worse and to prevent the heat from getting to hot, i added an 80mm computer case fan to the back

of my Dell 2005FPW!!! :D anyways, its really hot to get the strings though the back of this monitor though hehe :Ds...

picture3662oz.jpg

and this method really works!!! no more heat whatsoever when i touch the back of htis monitor!!!

586299811[/snapback]

why would you do that to such a pretty monitor? :(

lol, good question.. :D

i push my monitor all the way into the wall so no one would see it, plus my computer desk has to wood stands on the left and right side so it hides the fan very nicely :D

anyways, can someone help me with my question below:

i have some question about Dell RMA procedure...

I order a Dell 2005FPW LCD Monitor on 7/11/2005 and so tommorrow my 21 days policy for a refund will end which is on the 7/31/2005... So if I call Dell today to get me an RMA number for a refund. Do you

think that it is still possible for me to do that? I meant, today and tommorrow is weekends so there is no way that i can send the monitor to them becuase all postal service around

my area is close. So the only way i can ship the package to them is on this Monday, but this monday which is 8/01/2005 is my 22 days of ordering the monitor which means it has passed the

time period for a 21 days return policy...

Can anyone make sure for me that they will still give me a refund for this?

Edited by lanvo

Does anyone think I would be cheeky asking for some compensation from Dell?

I ordered this little under a month ago and have had 2 monitors so far, both with internal exposure issues and the second with a slightly scratched screen.

They have yet to send me my promised 3rd replacement, which was supposed to be here last Monday (Instead, 2 power cables turned up...). I was expecting something yesterday after they said my replacement was on 'high priority', but nothing!

I still have the second faulty unit here, they said I could keep it until I was happy with the replacement. The irony is I can't really (and don't want to) use it due to the scratch damage!

Argh!!! :angry:

So can anyone help me with my voltage question? :(

Hi, I've just bought one of these babies from the US, and I'd like to know something about the powersupply.

You see, I live in Australia, a our voltages are different(ours is around 220v), so I'll need to get some sort of replacement cord or an adaptor.

Now what I need to know it what sort of power supply this monitor uses; an external powersupply, or on that's built into the monitor. If it's a built in one, does it have a 110/220v switch.

I'm hoping I won't have to buy a 220>110 transformer, cause those things are meant ot be expensive. :(

Thanks in advance. :D

586291455[/snapback]

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!