Recommended Posts

I agree about only rolling on items that are made for the character you are using in that dungeon, but I also agree that it's not that big of a deal because you can gear yourself out with tokens anyway. Once you are geared up on tokens you can get into a good 10 or 25 man run and get the really good ****.

I agree about only rolling on items that are made for the character you are using in that dungeon

If I'm playing a retribution paladin - wouldn't a +spellpower shield be made for the character I'm using every bit as much as it's made for an elemental shaman?

If I have a fully ilevel 258/264 tank set on a paladin, would you really rather I show up in quest blues & greens to heal your dungeon and collect the healing loot?

Alternatively: if I have a good quality DPS set on a death knight, do you want me to show up to tank your dungeon with 22k HP, under 510 defence, and 20% avoidance or would you prefer I did 5,000 DPS on my main spec and get the run finished quicker?

I understand that people want to reduce competition for specific drops but in that situation you're better off forming your own group in advance. PuGs have no obligation to one-another, and I argue somebody going on their 'main spec' and collecting loot for 'offspec' is the responsible thing to do because it maximizes their contribution to the run.

Edited by evn.
i've been away from WoW for well over a year and i'm finally back as a prot war (used to play a Rogue)

the game a changed so much since i left

the biggest... "improvement".... seems to be the upgrade to the LFG utility

at first i was very impressed by it, i could find a group in less than a minute

then i remembered all the problems with pugging instances

now with dual spec everyone wants everything. DPS rolling on tank gear, tanks rolling on DPS gear. healers rolling on DPS gear. DPS rolling on healer gear.

it's madness

if you want prot gear come to the instance as a TANK

in the 4 years i played before i quit i NEVER rolled on off spec gear. if i came as combat rogue i don't touch daggers for the dagger rogue. if i'm there as a healer i don't touch DPS gear.

tl;dr

"i'm rolling for off spec"

kthxbye

/QQ

I take it you've upgraded to WoTLK? Do you like the new content? What about gaining XP in PvP?

Usual rule is if no-one needs for main spec, then those that want can need for off spec. Alternatively you can choose to DE, which has driven the price of Abyss Crystals down from 120g to 15g on Eonar.

On another note I noticed above; if someone turns up for FoS/HoR HC in blues they usually get kicked by vote.

I take it you've upgraded to WoTLK? Do you like the new content? What about gaining XP in PvP?

Usual rule is if no-one needs for main spec, then those that want can need for off spec. Alternatively you can choose to DE, which has driven the price of Abyss Crystals down from 120g to 15g on Eonar.

On another note I noticed above; if someone turns up for FoS/HoR HC in blues they usually get kicked by vote.

I never actually got kicked but I have 3/4 Epics and people still complained. My Gear score was around 3800 at the time. People really dont like when the tank is "under" geared. I think it really just becomes a matter of laziness for the healer who is used to coasting through content. I do have experience healing with both a priest and a paladin and I understand the want to have an easy PUG but sometimes it's just not fair to the guys who are just trying to upagrade from blue. If we don't give them a chance, who will?

I take it you've upgraded to WoTLK? Do you like the new content? What about gaining XP in PvP?

Usual rule is if no-one needs for main spec, then those that want can need for off spec. Alternatively you can choose to DE, which has driven the price of Abyss Crystals down from 120g to 15g on Eonar.

On another note I noticed above; if someone turns up for FoS/HoR HC in blues they usually get kicked by vote.

Oh, you playing on Eonar? Which side? Losers or winners (if you're playing PVP you'll surely know)? :)

I never actually got kicked but I have 3/4 Epics and people still complained. My Gear score was around 3800 at the time. People really dont like when the tank is "under" geared. I think it really just becomes a matter of laziness for the healer who is used to coasting through content. I do have experience healing with both a priest and a paladin and I understand the want to have an easy PUG but sometimes it's just not fair to the guys who are just trying to upagrade from blue. If we don't give them a chance, who will?

I (used to, before quitting) prefer healing undergeared tanks. Kept me awake while doing the mundane task of healing, especially while farming badges.. I have literally fallen asleep on the keyboard countless times.

I take it you've upgraded to WoTLK? Do you like the new content? What about gaining XP in PvP?

Usual rule is if no-one needs for main spec, then those that want can need for off spec. Alternatively you can choose to DE, which has driven the price of Abyss Crystals down from 120g to 15g on Eonar.

On another note I noticed above; if someone turns up for FoS/HoR HC in blues they usually get kicked by vote.

i got to 80 a week after LK launched

but i had to quit right after that because RL got a little crazy....

as for the content... i did everything but naxx when it was fresh

it was fun to see some of the new boss mechanics. wish i had time to put some time into raiding....

i'm actually VERY disappointed with the way that heroics have turned out

although i haven't done any of the new instances (PoS, HoR etc), from what i've seen EVERYTHING is tank and spank and trash pulls are just button mashing

i wish Blizzard would revert the difficulty back to the pre-nerf heroics from BC

i wish Blizzard would revert the difficulty back to the pre-nerf heroics from BC

Those days are dead and gone. I liked the difficulty of a 3 hour slave pens clear the week after TBC launched ("What if we use shield wall on this double defender pull?It'll be back up by the time we get to the next pair?" but most people loathed them. By the time I was being forced into shattered halls/arcatraz/shadow lab for the fifth time in a week (for attunements) I'd had my fill of them.

I'd like to see "tiered" 5-man content. 2 or 3 dungeons that drop "tier N" quality loot and tuned at TBC pre-nerf difficulty. As new raids are released, bundle those with 8 or 9 bosses worth of 5-man content (even if it's just buffing existing stuff) that drop appropriate quality gear.

For what it's worth: I had a great time doing a 5-man run of Sarth. Each week we're going to add 1 drake and see if we can't do 3-drakes as 5-man content. No drakes was a complete joke. After that it's on to 5-man Naxx.

Those days are dead and gone. I liked the difficulty of a 3 hour slave pens clear the week after TBC launched ("What if we use shield wall on this double defender pull?It'll be back up by the time we get to the next pair?" but most people loathed them. By the time I was being forced into shattered halls/arcatraz/shadow lab for the fifth time in a week (for attunements) I'd had my fill of them.

haha

ya those were good days

my personal favourite:

in heroic UB

"ok, frost mage, you're going to shoot that bog lord with frost bolts and kite him around until we kill that other bog lord. then we all run out, reset, and kill the bog lord you were just kiting"

close second was always seeing this: "LF mage for H MgT"

because the only way to do it was with CC

AoE pulls are for girls :laugh:

College Vacation + Girlfriend at work + Tuesdays = Complete and utter boredom.

Yeah but think of it this way. the extended maintenance today is because they are making the Friends and Family Alpha live :D so the beta is just around the corner.

close second was always seeing this: "LF mage for H MgT"

because the only way to do it was with CC

AoE pulls are for girls :laugh:

For laughs we used to run 5-mage H MGT. Just CC the entire pull and zerg down the mobs one at a time.

9/10 times it was more effective than trying to do it the 'expected' way.

yeah the alpha starts today wow.com and a few others have posted pics of the install disk and stuff.

WoW.com also confirmed those pics were fake. Though no one denies the Alpha starts Soon?.

According to The Associated Press, 23 year old Christopher H. Bouffard accepted $760 in 2008 from at least two people in exchange for WoW accounts. Bouffard then failed to turn over the agreed upon accounts, leading to a police investigation. He has now been charged with two counts of grand theft and one count of scheming to defraud. Bouffard is currently being held in jail until he is able to post a $20,000 bail.

While defrauding people and taking their money isn't anything new, getting busted over it while selling WoW accounts is. From what we understand, the arrest is not for the actual trading and selling of accounts, but for the fraud that went on in the process. The fraud in this case is a criminal matter with very real implications for Mr. Bouffard, whereas the buying and selling of WoW accounts is against the agreed upon Terms of Service, but not against any criminal code.

:laugh:. What a moron.

According to The Associated Press, 23 year old Christopher H. Bouffard accepted $760 in 2008 from at least two people in exchange for WoW accounts. Bouffard then failed to turn over the agreed upon accounts, leading to a police investigation. He has now been charged with two counts of grand theft and one count of scheming to defraud. Bouffard is currently being held in jail until he is able to post a $20,000 bail.

While defrauding people and taking their money isn't anything new, getting busted over it while selling WoW accounts is. From what we understand, the arrest is not for the actual trading and selling of accounts, but for the fraud that went on in the process. The fraud in this case is a criminal matter with very real implications for Mr. Bouffard, whereas the buying and selling of WoW accounts is against the agreed upon Terms of Service, but not against any criminal code.

:laugh:. What a moron.

Ya I read that early and thought it was a joke, but then I say it pop up on a news site and roughly thought 'What a moron!' too.

And to be honest, with the amount of time I have put into my account, I think I'd want a lot more than $700.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!