Recommended Posts

the first screenshot by shawncruiksh is real. the second post from Lee McDermott is a complete fake. like utaks said.... "CLIPHER". and the result of the screenshot blending is a disaster. also look at my previous post on shawncruiksh screenshot.

shawncruiksh screenshot

ie5wa.th.jpg

Lee McDermott screenshot

ie78ht.th.jpg

Edited by noneneed
okay,we need a leak though  :shifty: waiting ......

                                                      waiting .....

                                                      waiting ....

                                                      waiting ...

                                                      waiting ..

                                                      waiting .

585898206[/snapback]

waiting ......

waiting .....

waiting ....

waiting ...

waiting ..

waiting .

LEAKED!! in my dreams

:pinch:

waiting ......

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? waiting .....

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? waiting ....

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? waiting ...

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? waiting ..

? ?:pinch:? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? waiting .

LEAKED!! in my dreams

:pinch:

585898311[/snapback]

the fact that at leas;)one person who has it that shouldnt officialy have it yet means it has leaked. a leak is a leak regadless if its not a public leak ;) (as much as it sucks not being a public leak).

Im also willing to bet that this is up on the internal network for employees to do dogfood testing. If thats so then this easily leaked.

It is 100% fake. I just spoke the the Lead IE Program Manager, his words were:

"Some people have way too much time on their hands."

"Some people are clever with photoshop."

"You'd think they might have better more productive things to do with their time:))"

So please, it's fake;))

585900346[/snapback]

Please , creamhakered will never lye us :pp , I think is real :woot::

everyone of those screenshots was made in photoshop cs2. opera says in properties!  :crazy:

585900703[/snapback]

duh, you take a screenshot and paste it into a gfx app like say cs, and then save it, so its gonna say what app produced the saved file, so it doesn't mean its been created from scratch in PHOTOSHOP! :rolleyes:

everyone of those screenshots was made in photoshop cs2. opera says in properties!  :crazy:

585900703[/snapback]

If you would care to read the rest of the thread - its known that people paste and save screenshots, then save them unedited in CS2.

duh, you take a screenshot and paste it into a gfx app like say cs, and then save it, so its gonna say what app produced the saved file, so it doesn't mean its been created from scratch in PHOTOSHOP!  :rolleyes:

585900733[/snapback]

I was just going to say that! Seriously, just becuase it says it was made in cs2 does not mean it is doctored. Thus, do not jump to comclusions just let things work out...google results...i dobut highly becuase maybe it just hasnt been leaked yet (duh) ...so i don't think anyone should be pointing fingers or saying this is a lie...in all probability this is true. Thus i think everyone should just let the man be. Even if it isnt true...this thread does not need 7 pages of people arguing about whether it is or not. I highly suggest everyone just waits for the beta release and let the hype simmer for a while.

everyone of those screenshots was made in photoshop cs2. opera says in properties!  :crazy:

585900703[/snapback]

What other program would you use to take a screenshot with?

Let me make a few things clear - believe it or not, I don't have time to compile fake screenshots of a pre-beta build of internet explorer. These images were sent to me from a very reliable source (confirmed by creamhackered, and images sent to me during SP2 beta were also confirmed by him as well).

Also, the build has not been leaked - and will not be leaked - atleast by me. My source has acess to internal builds because of a related project his team is working on.

Lastly, I've noticed that the XP flag in my first image posted has been cleaned up quite a bit. Could this suggest GUI improvements are now beginning?

I've requested more screenshots, and any details he can provide me. I guess we'll all have to wait!

:D

looks like firefox

585900754[/snapback]

I'm pretty sure the full screen image is either a concept image or an early alpha. Not much information was provided about it...

I find it interesting that top toolbar (File; Edit; Favorites; etc..) can be hidden. Also, it's interesting to see the favorites icon seperated from the rest - and mixed in with the tabs. :unsure:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!