[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Err, dude, wth? Those pictures are from Digital Blasphemy. http://www.digitalblasphemy.com/

Those are done on PC, so I don't see how you can say there done on same 'graphic proccesor'. :\

:laugh:

The attempts of some of these kids to gain popularity is amazingly pathetic.

VR Tech. In Nintendo Revolution...

sweet man, thats what I have been waiting for since may of last year.. id be disapointed if it couldn't play Virtual Boy games if it was a visor though.. maybe Nintendo made some major backward compatibility changes since E3 2005 that they didn't mention...

there are some pretty rare virtual boy games that I as a person would love to get my hands on, but they are so rare and hard to find that they can get pricy on Ebay.

They couldn't possibly pull off that kind of quality at 480p...could they?

Well, the thumbnails aren't even 480p, and honestly the full-size pic of the first shot doesn't look much better than the lower-res version, so I'd have to say that it's possible as long as the revolution can do enough effects and push enough polys (for the grass, etc.).

With all the HD hype, people don't give enough credit to how good even 480i can look with just an s-video cable. I'd kill to have a game that looks as good as the latest big budget 3D animation DVD's I've seen on my simple 32" SDTV.

BTW, I call bullshot on those pics without a source. :)

Stop being sorry, there is no reason to be. Spam is a word generated by a bunch of elitists thinking their eyes should not be forced to read, or watch, something ever again. But the problem with it is, they choose to read it, or watch it again, then bitch about it being posted.

Revolution Report Talks with ATI about Hollywood

Revolution Report: A number of Web sites have inferred that Revolution will be significantly inferior graphically. While it certainly seems like Revolution won't output in HD, is it safe to assume that Hollywood will not feature a comparable polygon count or the same amount of graphical effects as the Xbox 360's GPU?

Swinimer: What I can say is that ATI is focused, as is Nintendo, in making [Revolution] a great, gaming entertainment platform. I know that a lot of journalists are very focused on specs. It's the big thing; as a geek, I look for that too. The key thing to keep in mind is that Nintendo, with ATI's help, is trying to create a game console where you don't have to look at [specs].

From a broader perspective, we share in Nintendo's position that this console will be devoted to the general gamer. When you have a game developer developing [for] this, the goal is to ensure that they don't have to worry about the complexity that is required to develop the games by making them "jump through hoops." That was one of the benefits of working on the GameCube; developers were saying that it is quite easy to develop for and there are not a lot of complexities so they could produce titles easily. That being said, we want consumers to look at the game, play the game and be involved in it. We are doing our very best to make this Nintendo gaming experience the very best it can be.

Read the rest here:

http://www.revolutionreport.com/articles/read/254

Just goes to show that Nintendo know what they are doing, people are already excited about how they are going to play the machine. Yet people don't even know what the games will look like. They have kept this suspense going for ages now and everyone is still as eager to get the newest piece of info on the machine, no matter how small it may be. :D

Exactly. All Nintendo really have shown us is a bunch of people using the controller, the console itself, and a vague description of the VC. No launch title list. No fancy screenies or movies.

Yet the hype is HUGE. Sony had to release screenshots, movies and tech specs in order to get the same amount of hype.

that's the one thing i've always loved about nintendo. a) they always try something new and unique, even when the tried-and-true is working well for the public. b) they almost NEVER release specs and screens, or pre-rendered screens for that matter, of what the console will be like..... only what it will physically LOOK like. c) they don't really care about getting the best, most realistic looking graphics for the console's timeline.... they're more focused on the gameplay, which is what REALLY matters. d) seems like no matter what they do.... people try it. why? cause they're curious about what it is, and what it can do. Now... back to the gameplay bit.... I hate when you find a game that looks REALLY GOOD.... then you start to play it, and within minutes it turns into a heaping pile of crap. even some PC games do that. like Guild Wars for example. granted it may be a good game over time ( i don't know... i've only ever played the trial), but the same holds true. nice visuals for an RPG.... but it's not an MMORPG, and it's not entirely free-roam. And from what i've read, they're planning on having the next installment of the Super Smash Brothers series as a launch title, or at least close to launch, which i think is gonna rock. think SSB is one of my favorite game series (along side Soul Calibur..... sadly it seems that it has gone the way of Sony only). i honestly think it will be revolutionary. and i honestly think they should keep it named Nintendo Revolution. it's got a nice ring to it i think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!