Recommended Posts

I'd like to know this also.

586295599[/snapback]

In display settings go to advanced. There you can change the DPI, which I BELIEVE changes the size of the icons. Read what it says and try it out. I never tried it because it requires a reboot and I dont find the icons too annoying at my max res of 1280x1024.

Anyone get it working correctly with an Audigy 2 ZS?

I have the drivers installed, but get garbled sound after playing a song or so.

586295886[/snapback]

i installed my drivers using XP compatibility, and that solved the problem, however, mine isnt an audigy of any time, so it might not apply, but tis worth a shot

i installed my drivers using XP compatibility, and that solved the problem, however, mine isnt an audigy of any time, so it might not apply, but tis worth a shot

586295915[/snapback]

The setup on my machine runs fine, so the XP Compatbility mode would be pointless.

I've also tried to point it directly to the drivers from Device Manager. Same problems...

The setup on my machine runs fine, so the XP Compatbility mode would be pointless.

I've also tried to point it directly to the drivers from Device Manager.  Same problems...

586295928[/snapback]

Thats my point, when i installed standard, i had your issue, when i selected XP compat., the issue fixed itsself

could be coincidence, granted, but still

I also met  this problem!

ai first i only build one subarea ,and windows appeared the message the same as yours!

then i build another subarea,all is OK NOW!

586295308[/snapback]

Subarea? You mean... Partition?

I'm installing onto my Backup Drive (Where my backups are kept) and I cannot create a new partition, nor do I want to format it. (I guess I could, and make some new backups...)

But what can I do to get past that error during install?

I'm trying to install Vista to VMWare 5 but no matter i do, everytime i get the same error.

I tried everything and none of them worked.

I'm using 7GB partition partitioned with XP Setup (also tried with my old Partiton Magic floppies) with 256MB RAM allocated - tried with both WinXP and Longhorn Experimental profiles in VMWare.

I see people got installed on their VMWare's.

So what am i doing wrong ?

post-15612-1122717088.png

no your not the only oe :D i also have an 5200 and dont have transparency, before nvidia i did but windows were moving slow so i had to install the drivers, btw on a 1,5 ghz pc it starts up faster than xp and when your working it doesnt hear that the computer is "working" and o yeah, MSN messenger doenst work with the beta! it starts up but it doesnt connect

no your not the only oe :D i also have an 5200 and dont have transparency, before nvidia i did but windows were moving slow so i had to install the drivers, btw on a 1,5 ghz pc it starts up faster than xp and when your working it doesnt hear that the computer is "working" and o yeah, MSN messenger doenst work with the beta! it starts up but it doesnt connect

586296700[/snapback]

both msn 7 and msn 7.5 work fine with Beta 1, on several pc's

I'm trying to install Vista to VMWare 5 but no matter i do, everytime i get the same error.

I tried everything and none of them worked.

I'm using 7GB partition partitioned with XP Setup (also tried with my old Partiton Magic floppies) with 256MB RAM allocated  - tried with both WinXP and Longhorn Experimental profiles in VMWare.

I see people got installed on their VMWare's.

So what am i doing wrong ?

post-15612-1122717088.png

586296660[/snapback]

1. The ram is way to low.

2. You gotta create a non when-files-come-i-grow virtual disk.

3. Install it on real hardware :whistle:

I'm trying to install Vista to VMWare 5 but no matter i do, everytime i get the same error.

I tried everything and none of them worked.

I'm using 7GB partition partitioned with XP Setup (also tried with my old Partiton Magic floppies) with 256MB RAM allocated  - tried with both WinXP and Longhorn Experimental profiles in VMWare.

I see people got installed on their VMWare's.

So what am i doing wrong ?

post-15612-1122717088.png

586296660[/snapback]

Just mount the CD within VMWare and install from boot on a fixed size partition with 512mb RAM reserved...

Can anyone please tell me what Anti-Virus & Firewall programs work with Vista Beta 1? I've tried to install Norton Internet Security 2005 (Compatibility Mode) and it dosen't lik it.

I's there a system restore like XP???

Thanks in advance.

586296951[/snapback]

I've tried AVG Free, NOD32 and AntiVir. AntiVir is the only one that works for me.

There's no system restore option in Beta 1.

no your not the only oe :D i also have an 5200 and dont have transparency, before nvidia i did but windows were moving slow so i had to install the drivers, btw on a 1,5 ghz pc it starts up faster than xp and when your working it doesnt hear that the computer is "working" and o yeah, MSN messenger doenst work with the beta! it starts up but it doesnt connect

586296700[/snapback]

i have a fx5200, used the nvidia lddm ( https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=350977 ) and i have the glass effect etc...

Anyone get it working correctly with an Audigy 2 ZS?

I have the drivers installed, but get garbled sound after playing a song or so.

586295886[/snapback]

I can't get my SB Live! 5.1 Digital to work either :(

I can't use this either, because I have one bad stick of memory, and WinXP Pro will work fine with it, will get the occasional BSOD with it (That didn't bother me), but Vista won't boot at all with that stick of RAM, and I need all 1.5Gb, so IO can't use it :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!