Recommended Posts

Adblock works wonders for me. It blocks ads from annoying sites, allows me to see ads in Neowin, and did I mention it allows ads in Neowin to be shown? ;)

In all seriousness, the ads Neowin implents are the best I have seen. They never get in the way and its hard to even tell they are there. Plus, being a subscriber I am and allowing ads to be shown allows Neobond to pay off 2 hours of bandwidth ;)

Indeed! AdBlock has a wonderful feature called whitelisting. (Y)

In all seriousness, the ads Neowin implents are the best I have seen. They never get in the way and its hard to even tell they are there. Plus, being a subscriber I am and allowing ads to be shown allows Neobond to pay off 2 hours of bandwidth ;)

Yep (Y) They are so well placed you don't even notice them after a while.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I have never used adblock because I'm so used to ads that I simply DON'T care about them at all. As if they weren't there. Not talking about Neowin, but every other website on the internet (even the newspaper I read, which usually welcomes me with a huge massive flash ad that covers the whole page up). I have to admit that I have accidentally clicked on those ads that appear on those common words. But it takes less than a second for me to hit the "back" button.

I don't block ads simply because after so many years, it's like they're not there, no matter how annoying they are. But frankly, I find it TOTALLY legit to block ads in webpages. Fine, it's fair for you not to encourage people to use any adblocking app to block ads on neowin, but raising people's warning levels seems a bit TOO far.

I think some people from time to time encourage people to click on the ads to support webpages. When somebody complains they say "hey! come on, click on the ads, to support mantaining the servers". From the advertiser point of view, I don't think it's right to pay when people click on the ads, when visitors close the page as soon as they can. That's not the case of neowin, I don't see any "click on the ads".

That's just my opinion. One suggestion, add the "no adblock" thing to the rules. Or add a rule "visit the site & forum issues" from time to time, to check for changes.

@Julius Caro, Read the rule close. It's not about you can't block ads, it's about you can't brag about and/or tell others how to block ads here on Neowin. AFAIK, no one has been warned for blocking them.. only for bragging about it or telling others how to do it.. for this site specifically.

From now on, people who tell others how to block ads here will be warned and moved into a flood control group with a minute wait. This includes members who gloat about blocking ads.

Profile and Sig options will also be removed (seeing as we have to pay for all that extra bandwidth on sigs).

Dont disrespect me guys because I'm fed up with it. Mods will be told about this new policy forthwith.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that this revenue keeps us online.

  • 1 month later...

hehe - the irony - on top of this thread is a goodle ad for "adblock" :rofl:

back on topic... I would personally pay for an ad free version of neowin, IF the subscriptions thing was sorted out - i opted in for a mail subscription a while ago, but due to a dodgy shipping co. the payment was returned months later - but theres no way for me to change this OR start a fresh subscription and pay with paypal. I Have PM'd mods about it (and i PM'd Redmak with it!), but whenever i PM a mod (apart from Frank and Giga, theyre great :)), i never get a reply... Maybe the mods are too busy for us :)

As said, i dont block ads, and i do click them because they are a source of income for Neowin, but if there was the option to easily subscribe to an ad free version (or an ad free + mail version), then i'd happily fork out for it :)

Im gunna try to PM another mod to get my current subscription removed, maybe i'll pester Frank :D

Oh, and Neobond, maybe you should implement this into the rules, and/or send everyone a PM with it in, because not everyone reads this forum, and that way you can just say, "Look its there...", then people cant argue (not that they can argue with the owner anyway :D)

edit: its late-ish and my typing sucks

bMaher

Edited by bmaher
Quote - (Neobond @ Oct 25 2005, 02:29)

From now on, people who tell others how to block ads here will be warned and moved into a flood control group with a minute wait. This includes members who gloat about blocking ads.

Profile and Sig options will also be removed (seeing as we have to pay for all that extra bandwidth on sigs).

Dont disrespect me guys because I'm fed up with it. Mods will be told about this new policy forthwith.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that this revenue keeps us online.

If the boss man says it, id listen....

The logic behind it is clear, if Neowin have a large community they are attractive to advertisers..but if neowin promote adblocking , then it becomes less attractive..no money to run the site and eventually.....

********* T U M B L E W E E D **************

.

Profile and Sig options will also be removed (seeing as we have to pay for all that extra bandwidth on sigs).

You do :huh: i could have sworn most sigs are remotely linked does neowin actally offer to host sigs then :unsure: or do you just mean the extra bandwith to load the link to the sig?

I'm confused

You do :huh: i could have sworn most sigs are remotely linked does neowin actally offer to host sigs then :unsure: or do you just mean the extra bandwith to load the link to the sig?

I'm confused

I'm pretty sure he was talking about the profile settings in general; avatars and things of that nature. All sig images are linked externally.

EDIT: Technically they pay for the text in our sigs, but that's bits :huh: I guess you can say with all the members it can add up to a certain ammount of gigs. :laugh:

It's been over a year here and there's still a discussion about this? The point has been made here: Don't block ads. :sleep:

Edited by oddcrap
  • 3 weeks later...

(Y) Not just because he said it, also because he's right

I use Adblock in FireFox, but I whitelist Neowin. I even click on the ads because it drives money into the site.

What I don't like is mods closing topics about ad blockers, just for the sake of the topic being about ad blockers.

That is simply rediculous.

There are more to some ads than just advertisements. Tracking cookies are put in place based on what you view, and then preferences are set for future ads that you view. I don't want to see that crap all over the place.

Nor do I want to see 3 million stupid avatars. This is why I use an ad blocker. I filter the crap I don't want to see, not to use a filter set to block _all_ ads.

The mods need to stop being so damn obtuse and realize this isn't the only site on the internet with ads. Just because Neowin's aren't annoying, it doesn't mean other's aren't.

OK, one second here. I just want to get one question clear: are we ALLOWED to talk about adblockers but we cannot talk about HOW TO adblock something on Neowin?

Look at this thread. It looked fine for a month... until a certain somebody rampaged through it. It's against the rules of Neowin to discuss the names of adblockers? I thought it was more about the methods that is prohibited, especially those pertaining to Neowin's ads. And judging by that thread, it sure as damn hell looks like it was only names of software that were posted, not actual methods.

I mean hell, TWO staff members were in that thread. If anything, if it was a violation it would've been taken care of long ago. It's over a month old for crying out loud. :rolleyes:

edit: Somnus noticed it already.

Edited by rm20010

OK, so are you saying I should allow discussion on adblocking now? (so long as they don't mention Neowin, yea right I think it pertains to Neowin aswell) hey why don't I just start recommending other sites to go to instead of Neowin at the same time? I could even start paying people to post here. That would close us down overnight and then we won't have to worry about bad old Neobond not allowing discussion on adblocking tools.

I give a lot to the membership here by not throwing ad's in your face like other sites do. You know pop-ups, full page flash ad's and multiple ad's all over the place in annoying positions/flashing and all.

Come on guys it's pure common-sense.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!