Marijuana or Alcohol?


What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)  

509 members have voted

  1. 1. What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)

    • Marijuana
      289
    • Alcohol
      220


Recommended Posts

Here is a scan from a popular mechanics magazine issue Feb. 1938:

10.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg

Also check out the drug war propaganda site http://www.freevibe.com/Drug_Facts/marijuana.asp

At first, pot can make people feel relaxed, in a good mood and even silly. Users will likely experience dry mouth, rapid heartbeat, some loss of coordination and poor sense of balance, and slower reaction times, along with intoxication. Blood vessels in the eye will expand causing the red-eye effect. NIDA

Smoking marijuana may impair short-term memory while people are using the drug. This happens because all forms of marijuana contain THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), the main active chemical in marijuana, which alters the way the brain works. After a few minutes, paranoia or anxiousness may set in, then intense hunger (a.k.a. the munchies). Finally, sleepiness

OH WOW! SUCH A BAD DRUG! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

The problem with pot is that it's way more powerful now - due to farmers cloning and distributing the most volatile plants.

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

You just don't know what's in it now - and although marijuana isn't addictive, I'm pretty sure that the dealers want recurring customers :p Therefore it wouldn't surprise me if pot nowadays is mixed with some sort of addictive product.

As for people who are baked? It's impossible to judge. Some people go silent as a rock and you can't even talk to them (which is weird)...some people get really funny :p But generally the mild paranoia the user experiences leads to a feeling of being "outcast" when around sober folks :D so the sober folks just leave them alone adding to the paranoia effect.

imho weed is no good unless you know exactly what's in it and how it treats you. same with booze. luckily, booze is regulated and tested. weed's illegal so the only way to know for sure is to grow yourself (which can be kinda difficult to explain to the power co./parents/signif. others....)

+As a medicine, the worldwide use of CANNABIS/HEMP/MARIJUANA goes back at least 6,000 years. It has been found to be healthy and effective in the treatment of chronic pain, cancer, strokes, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, sickle cell anemia, AIDS wasting and many other illnesses, including simple nausea, appetite stimulant, anxiety and muscle pains, etc.

586763738[/snapback]

That is an arguement for medicinal use, not recreational use.

Alcohol and smoking cause enough problems in society without legalising marijuana... you can get enjoyment out of life without being in a drug induced state. If smoking weed is what you need to do to be happy then that is very sad. I don't claim that is has any serious health risks, aside from the way it changes some people's personality, but I disagree with it from a social standpoint.

The problem with pot is that it's way more powerful now - due to farmers cloning and distributing the most volatile plants.

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

You just don't know what's in it now - and although marijuana isn't addictive, I'm pretty sure that the dealers want recurring customers :p Therefore it wouldn't surprise me if pot nowadays is mixed with some sort of addictive product.

586763815[/snapback]

weed is more potent today because of better growing methods, hydroponics, and better cross breeds but why do people think dealers lace weed with hard drugs? how would you make money putting an extra money into what your selling, plus its not like you woudn't notice hard drugs in your weed. furthermore unless your smoking out of a glass pipe most spliffs and pipes won't get hot enough to smoke meth, crack.

Marijuana is an evil plant that makes one extremely lazy and also leads to the use of cocaine and other hard drugs. It has ruined numerous communities. Keep it illegal and expand the penalties for possessing it at the federal level.

As for alcohol.. I believe all except mild wines should be banned. The reason for keeping wine around is, wine is OK because our Lord drank it and even transformed water into it. The age should be raised to 25 for any alcohol at the least.

586760941[/snapback]

Unfortunately, you forgot a 3rd item for the vote/poll:

O - Neither

Now THAT would make the poll a little more interesting.

---ScottKin

Marijuana is an evil plant that makes one extremely lazy and also leads to the use of cocaine and other hard drugs. It has ruined numerous communities. Keep it illegal and expand the penalties for possessing it at the federal level.

As for alcohol.. I believe all except mild wines should be banned. The reason for keeping wine around is, wine is OK because our Lord drank it and even transformed water into it. The age should be raised to 25 for any alcohol at the least.

586760941[/snapback]

:huh: ....

Meanwhile back in the real world...

I voted for Marijuana, even though i stopped smokin it a while back

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

Those 3 chemicals are much harder to come across, much more expensive than pot, and have a MUCH different effect than weed.

IMO, if someone smokes laced weed, the only thing it would be laced with is PCP since embalming fluid is very cheap. And if you do come across that weed and smoke it, I can garantee you that you will NOT be going back to the same person for weed because it will be a HORRIBLE experience. Laced weed will have a distinct smell and a horrible taste. Only weed will smell like a plant and taste like a spice you could find in your spice rack.

As to the person who replied to my comment about medical usage, your absolutely correct. However, how can you say a little social use here and there cant have positive side effects?

To the person who said that weed is more potent nowadays, you are absolutely correct as well. However, this means that the more potent the weed, the less you need to smoke. It doesnt make it more dangerous than less potent weed, theres just more stuff in it. Its like comparing a wine cooler to everclear -- but without the negative side effects of alcohol.

You also do not have to smoke marijuana to get the desired effects. Vaporizing reduces almost all tar and works by heating the marijuana up to the 200 or so degrees when the THC vaporizes...therefore you get pure THC vapor and no smoke -- perfectly healthy. You can also bake marijuana in fatty foods. The fat absorbs the THC into the food and the heat activates it. So when you digest, you feel the effects, but with no negative health effects.

Yes, I smoke. No I do not smoke daily, maybe once a week. Just like with alcohol, moderation is key. The more you do it, the more addicted you will get. People say weed isnt addicting, but that is also a misconception. It is psychologically addicting (not physically addicting like crack cocaine, etc...). Your body isnt dependant on the THC, but the mind craves it because the person enjoys it so much.

It seems alot of people like to cry foul without doing the slightest bit of research from nonbiased sources.

You can also bake marijuana in fatty foods.  The fat absorbs the THC into the food and the heat activates it.  So when you digest, you feel the effects, but with no negative health effects.

586764076[/snapback]

Hmmmmmm, Brownies... :drool:

Another reason I'm pro-marijuana is from an economical standpoint. I just think that the millions (billions?) of dollars spent every year on a drug war could be put to better use because, well where I'm from anyways, if you want some weed, its not hard to get at all. Nothing is stopping marijuana smokers from getting what they want, it hasn't worked in the past, and it isn't working now.

It just seems that socially, physcially, and economically, marijuana should be legal, and it seems that many people are starting to realize that its not the evil plant its made out to be. If someone wants to ruin their lives with marijuana, so be it. There are many alcoholics out there ruining their lives too. One just needs to learn how to use the drug responsibly, just as most drinkers do.

-}x0{-  it is nice to see someone who is educated and not a sheep that follows what ever they are told is true.

586764373[/snapback]

Yeah, I forgot to add that. I hate when people say weed can mess your life up etc. I mean, it probably can, but damn! :angry: I don't smoke often but I do every once and a while. Sometimes MONTHS pass before I light up. Last time I smoked was about 4 months ago. My ex and I smoked. MAN that was a great night...:D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!