Marijuana or Alcohol?


What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)  

509 members have voted

  1. 1. What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)

    • Marijuana
      289
    • Alcohol
      220


Recommended Posts

as for a couple hits being 10 beers.. have you ever smoked?? that not even close... i cant even begin to describe how wrong that is. alcohol != weed, totally different.

586760585[/snapback]

Don't you love it when ANYONE that who has no experience spouts off 'the truth'. I'm glad a lot of antidrug websites have dropped the 'over the top' bull**** they used to put out. These days, theantidrug.com warnings on marijuana look like warnings on alcohol or cigarettes. Still some alarmist 1920s/1930s hype, but better).

10 beers will **** you up. Unless you are a raging alcoholic or drank those 10 beers over an extended period. Imagine using a beer bong to consume 10 beers in a row...emergency room time. Now, imagine a couple hits of weed. Oranges to oranges my ass eh?

Marijuana causes brain damage and alcohol doesn't. Give me a ****ing break. Everything causes brain damage. Or interferes with 'normal' brain operation. Etc etc. Nicotine is supposedly very bad for congnition due to the way it 'interferes' with normal brain operation (I believe the study I read was using test scores pre and post to determine the influence, much like the tests theantidrug.com quotes regarding marijuana use and test scores...ohs nos).

When I was young, and alcohol was hard to get, I really liked Marijuana. A lot. As time went by it wasn't as much fun, but I still smoked some, drank a bit. Then stopped doing both. These days I drink a little, I'm finding that I enjoy trying different types of wine...had some delicious Oog's Blush from a local winery...so tasty! No more marijuana for me, but thats just a personal decision.

Hangovers suck for sure. Marijuana is so nice to your body, so hard to abuse. Alcohol can be such a bitch the next morning...

Edited by Garrett Socling
thats where your wrong my friend. beer makes people violent. weed makes people calm. two completely different things..

as for a couple hits being 10 beers.. have you ever smoked?? that not even close... i cant even begin to describe how wrong that is. alcohol != weed, totally different.

and another thing - saying Neobond is too high to find his keyboard.. i know it was a joke, but that doesn't make sense. too DRUNK to find it maybe. weed doesn't make you stupid like alcohol.

586760585[/snapback]

That's actually not wrong. "beer makes people violent" is a far from fact. That is true with some people, but in my experiences, that is only true for a very small percentage of people (less than 1%). If people are violent to begin with, of course beer wont help the situation, but beer does not randomly turn somebody violent. Also, "weed makes people calm" is far from fact. Again, it depends on the person. Some people act calm, but I've also seem many people that constantly walk around and talk very loudly and seem to minorly "freak out" when they were high.

As for my comparison from marijuana to beer, I know they aren't the same. However, in my personal experiences, the first thing that I thought was it felt like I suddenly had the effect of a whole bunch of alcohol, except none of that sick feeling that people sometimes get with alcohol. For me, both substances produce that calm and happy kind of feeling. So, for me at least, they are somewhat similar in the effects that they produce.

About the joke thing, yes it was a joke. However, if you really want to get into it, drunk people can lose things and high people can lose things. You seem to be assuming things about the effects these substances have on people. I don't know if you're basing your assumptions on your personal experiences or what, but you're assuming things that are simply too general.

Overall point of this reply: Both alcohol and marijuana have different effects on different people and it can depend on an almost endless amount of factors such as (but not limited to) specific kind of substance (hard alcohol vs beer, cheap weed vs expensive/high-quality weed), time of day, mood of person to begin with, social environment, and color of underwear. So stop saying things like "beer makes people violent" or "weed doesn't make you stupid like alcohol." It all depends.

Wow, I can't believe that the new denver vote is real! I live in denver (suburb of denver, but close enough) so thats fantastic! Except I'm not quite 21 yet, but that doesn't stop any kid in highschool from getting wasted every weekend now does it? :D

I once said that alcohol was the perfect drug for the masses because it left you feeling like **** the next day, which discouraged using it too much. Though to be fair, I was very drunk at the time, so I was probably a little biased. In the end though, I really don't care what other people put in their bodies.

That's actually not wrong. "beer makes people violent" is a far from fact. That is true with some people, but in my experiences, that is only true for a very small percentage of people (less than 1%). If people are violent to begin with, of course beer wont help the .......

586760762[/snapback]

In my experience, the stereotypes are 98% true. (More likely to be violent while drinking, blah blah blah)

Drugs are all bad, in my experience marijuana has ruined lives, so has alcohol, i have lost one uncle to alcohol, and i have seen 1 girlfriend and 3 family members wast away smoking pot, my x gf was a good girl, started smoking pot for 1 whole year, now she lives with her dad and she takes her whole paycheck for pot, she has tried to quit but she has headaches and cravings for it, broke my heart..

as for my family, my aunt is 43 years old and dumber than a damn doornob, she never used to be that way, you will try to talk to her and she is in a constant fog.

my opinions may be biased but hey, i have seen $hit, there was another thread similar to this and i poured all my emotions into it, i will not let my self do it to this thread also.

Edited by micro
Well then I guess our experiences differ. It happens.

586760794[/snapback]

Maybe i should rephrase that. I agree that if you are a more violent person to begin with then alcohol isn't neccessarily to blame. However i've seen drunks fight and potheads argue for a minute.

Maybe i should rephrase that. I agree that if you are a more violent person to begin with then alcohol isn't neccessarily to blame. However i've seen drunks fight and potheads argue for a minute.

586760819[/snapback]

Oh, I guess I was confused by your previous post. Whatever, I guess we agree then. :p

i don't care if you guys smoke. i've had and have friends that smoke. they tried to make me but I KNOW MUCH BETTER! ;)

i just wouldn't do it at all. i got a whole life in front of me. i'm not risking it with some ****ing plant.

586760907[/snapback]

Is that a weed leaf for your avatar? Kind of looks like one... I'm not going to argue with you about the effects of marijuana usage, but look at it this way, I have a 4.0 in school, have a job, have many friends, and i still smoke weed. I just don't throw my life away and live for it.

You can make up your mind about your views on weed, but it looks like you've victim to the anti-drug poisoning thats been given to you since the first grade. I thought the same thing about weed at first, but the only way to know is to try it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!