Marijuana or Alcohol?


What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)  

509 members have voted

  1. 1. What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)

    • Marijuana
      289
    • Alcohol
      220


Recommended Posts

Here is a scan from a popular mechanics magazine issue Feb. 1938:

10.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg

Also check out the drug war propaganda site http://www.freevibe.com/Drug_Facts/marijuana.asp

At first, pot can make people feel relaxed, in a good mood and even silly. Users will likely experience dry mouth, rapid heartbeat, some loss of coordination and poor sense of balance, and slower reaction times, along with intoxication. Blood vessels in the eye will expand causing the red-eye effect. NIDA

Smoking marijuana may impair short-term memory while people are using the drug. This happens because all forms of marijuana contain THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), the main active chemical in marijuana, which alters the way the brain works. After a few minutes, paranoia or anxiousness may set in, then intense hunger (a.k.a. the munchies). Finally, sleepiness

OH WOW! SUCH A BAD DRUG! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

The problem with pot is that it's way more powerful now - due to farmers cloning and distributing the most volatile plants.

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

You just don't know what's in it now - and although marijuana isn't addictive, I'm pretty sure that the dealers want recurring customers :p Therefore it wouldn't surprise me if pot nowadays is mixed with some sort of addictive product.

As for people who are baked? It's impossible to judge. Some people go silent as a rock and you can't even talk to them (which is weird)...some people get really funny :p But generally the mild paranoia the user experiences leads to a feeling of being "outcast" when around sober folks :D so the sober folks just leave them alone adding to the paranoia effect.

imho weed is no good unless you know exactly what's in it and how it treats you. same with booze. luckily, booze is regulated and tested. weed's illegal so the only way to know for sure is to grow yourself (which can be kinda difficult to explain to the power co./parents/signif. others....)

+As a medicine, the worldwide use of CANNABIS/HEMP/MARIJUANA goes back at least 6,000 years. It has been found to be healthy and effective in the treatment of chronic pain, cancer, strokes, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, sickle cell anemia, AIDS wasting and many other illnesses, including simple nausea, appetite stimulant, anxiety and muscle pains, etc.

586763738[/snapback]

That is an arguement for medicinal use, not recreational use.

Alcohol and smoking cause enough problems in society without legalising marijuana... you can get enjoyment out of life without being in a drug induced state. If smoking weed is what you need to do to be happy then that is very sad. I don't claim that is has any serious health risks, aside from the way it changes some people's personality, but I disagree with it from a social standpoint.

The problem with pot is that it's way more powerful now - due to farmers cloning and distributing the most volatile plants.

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

You just don't know what's in it now - and although marijuana isn't addictive, I'm pretty sure that the dealers want recurring customers :p Therefore it wouldn't surprise me if pot nowadays is mixed with some sort of addictive product.

586763815[/snapback]

weed is more potent today because of better growing methods, hydroponics, and better cross breeds but why do people think dealers lace weed with hard drugs? how would you make money putting an extra money into what your selling, plus its not like you woudn't notice hard drugs in your weed. furthermore unless your smoking out of a glass pipe most spliffs and pipes won't get hot enough to smoke meth, crack.

Marijuana is an evil plant that makes one extremely lazy and also leads to the use of cocaine and other hard drugs. It has ruined numerous communities. Keep it illegal and expand the penalties for possessing it at the federal level.

As for alcohol.. I believe all except mild wines should be banned. The reason for keeping wine around is, wine is OK because our Lord drank it and even transformed water into it. The age should be raised to 25 for any alcohol at the least.

586760941[/snapback]

Unfortunately, you forgot a 3rd item for the vote/poll:

O - Neither

Now THAT would make the poll a little more interesting.

---ScottKin

Marijuana is an evil plant that makes one extremely lazy and also leads to the use of cocaine and other hard drugs. It has ruined numerous communities. Keep it illegal and expand the penalties for possessing it at the federal level.

As for alcohol.. I believe all except mild wines should be banned. The reason for keeping wine around is, wine is OK because our Lord drank it and even transformed water into it. The age should be raised to 25 for any alcohol at the least.

586760941[/snapback]

:huh: ....

Meanwhile back in the real world...

I voted for Marijuana, even though i stopped smokin it a while back

Nevermind the possiblility of getting some herb sprinkled with meth/speed/ex.

Those 3 chemicals are much harder to come across, much more expensive than pot, and have a MUCH different effect than weed.

IMO, if someone smokes laced weed, the only thing it would be laced with is PCP since embalming fluid is very cheap. And if you do come across that weed and smoke it, I can garantee you that you will NOT be going back to the same person for weed because it will be a HORRIBLE experience. Laced weed will have a distinct smell and a horrible taste. Only weed will smell like a plant and taste like a spice you could find in your spice rack.

As to the person who replied to my comment about medical usage, your absolutely correct. However, how can you say a little social use here and there cant have positive side effects?

To the person who said that weed is more potent nowadays, you are absolutely correct as well. However, this means that the more potent the weed, the less you need to smoke. It doesnt make it more dangerous than less potent weed, theres just more stuff in it. Its like comparing a wine cooler to everclear -- but without the negative side effects of alcohol.

You also do not have to smoke marijuana to get the desired effects. Vaporizing reduces almost all tar and works by heating the marijuana up to the 200 or so degrees when the THC vaporizes...therefore you get pure THC vapor and no smoke -- perfectly healthy. You can also bake marijuana in fatty foods. The fat absorbs the THC into the food and the heat activates it. So when you digest, you feel the effects, but with no negative health effects.

Yes, I smoke. No I do not smoke daily, maybe once a week. Just like with alcohol, moderation is key. The more you do it, the more addicted you will get. People say weed isnt addicting, but that is also a misconception. It is psychologically addicting (not physically addicting like crack cocaine, etc...). Your body isnt dependant on the THC, but the mind craves it because the person enjoys it so much.

It seems alot of people like to cry foul without doing the slightest bit of research from nonbiased sources.

You can also bake marijuana in fatty foods.  The fat absorbs the THC into the food and the heat activates it.  So when you digest, you feel the effects, but with no negative health effects.

586764076[/snapback]

Hmmmmmm, Brownies... :drool:

Another reason I'm pro-marijuana is from an economical standpoint. I just think that the millions (billions?) of dollars spent every year on a drug war could be put to better use because, well where I'm from anyways, if you want some weed, its not hard to get at all. Nothing is stopping marijuana smokers from getting what they want, it hasn't worked in the past, and it isn't working now.

It just seems that socially, physcially, and economically, marijuana should be legal, and it seems that many people are starting to realize that its not the evil plant its made out to be. If someone wants to ruin their lives with marijuana, so be it. There are many alcoholics out there ruining their lives too. One just needs to learn how to use the drug responsibly, just as most drinkers do.

-}x0{-  it is nice to see someone who is educated and not a sheep that follows what ever they are told is true.

586764373[/snapback]

Yeah, I forgot to add that. I hate when people say weed can mess your life up etc. I mean, it probably can, but damn! :angry: I don't smoke often but I do every once and a while. Sometimes MONTHS pass before I light up. Last time I smoked was about 4 months ago. My ex and I smoked. MAN that was a great night...:D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!