Neowin's Official World Cup 2006 Thread



Recommended Posts

BLAH BLAH BLAH Lethal!

Like I said you can have that goal, we scored another so it doesn't really matter. Say all you want we won the cup and have choked since. You will never win the cup and should be sponsored by speedo in 2010. To call the English win controvesial is the pot calling the kettle black coming from a Portuguese fan.

buahahahaha..... bye bye portugal... :bounce:

i just hope france play well in the final- i want italy to loose becuase of thier diving and false tactics...

nice to see portugal still got thier skill of false diving. :yes:

:bounce: viva la france....!! :bounce:

Is it just me or was there a sudden surge of portugese members? Anyway, I hope France go all the way to win it.

Not me, I've been here almost two years now...

Watching the comments, I got to hand it to Portugal fans! No whining, no complaining, no swearing! Just shows the different intelligence level of both sides.

Thank you. And it's quite hard to restrain oneself from stepping down to their level.

Slightly off topic, sorry for any offence but i found this funny lol

Ahha... gotta hand it there... stupid but well-made.

I wouldn't call it cheating. They were just desperate to get anything in their favor and they failed doing it. Let me tell you, the word cheating is being used very loosely nowadays.

cheat (cht)

v. cheat?ed, cheat?ing, cheats

v.tr.1. To deceive by trickeryb>; swindle: cheated customers by overcharging them for purchases.

2. To deprive by trickery; defraud: cheated them of their land3. To misleadb>; fool: illusions that cheat the eye.

4. To elude; escape: cheat death.

v.intr1. To act dishonestlyb>; practice fraud.. To violate rules deliberately,b> as in a game: was accused of cheating at cards.

3. Informal To be sexually unfaithful: cheat on a spouse.

1. An act of cheating; a fraud or swindle.

2. One who cheats; a swindler.

3. Law Fraudulent acquisition of another's property.

4. Botany An annual European species of brome grass (Bromus secalinus) widely naturalized in temperate regions.

I've highlighted the relevant points:p:p

Omg, you england fanboys are pathetic. Ill not quote you anymore, its useless

Anyway, Portugal deserved the victory but they pay the price for their lost because the lack of skiils near the big surface.

Zidane the almight did almost nothing during this game, what proves if he has a decent adversary he is just a good player. (shame on the **** BR, which sold the stupid WC again....damn mercenaries)

For the final....clearly Italy will beat the hell out of France.

Good for them, Italy really deserve the title.

And i believe Germany will have 3rd place.

My general opinion of this WC is that was kind poor.

With lots of "unfair" play and poor presentation from most of the teams.

The technical level was average. (maybe the heat played an important role)

Ive seen much better WCs, it seems like the business has taken over the sport and i believe it will be worst from now on.

With FIFA (govts. ?!?!) and sponsors deciding the destiny of the WC and major competitions.

Maybe the 4th star for the italians will make the brazilian mercenaries move their asses in 2010.

Omg, you england fanboys are pathetic. Ill not quote you anymore, its useless

Anyway, Portugal deserved the victory but they pay the price for their lost because the lack of skiils near the big surface.

Zidane the almight did almost nothing during this game, what proves if he has a decent adversary he is just a good player. (shame on the **** BR, which sold the stupid WC again....damn mercenaries)

For the final....clearly Italy will beat the hell out of France.

Good for them, Italy really deserve the title.

And i believe Germany will have 3rd place.

My general opinion of this WC is that was kind poor.

With lots of "unfair" play and poor presentation from most of the teams.

The technical level was average. (maybe the heat played an important role)

Ive seen much better WCs, it seems like the business has taken over the sport and i believe it will be worst from now on.

With FIFA (govts. ?!?!) and sponsors deciding the destiny of the WC and major competitions.

Maybe the 4th star for the italians will make the brazilian mercenaries move their asses in 2010.

Which game are you talking about? If it is tonights game against France, then you are wrong. As I have said before the aim of football is to score goals. The more you score the better. France scored, Portugal didn't. End of story, France win. It doesn't matter who you think played the better football.

^.....im just commenting the game from my point of view.

im not questioning the result.

pay more attantion when replying.

most of you are not for France, you were against Portugal. (you would have been against any other team that would have pwned you)

just because you got owned by them, again !

shame on you.

Well, I think Portugal played well. On the first half, the two teams were balanced. There were opportunities for both sides. But then, at 33' Henry was fouled in the area by Carvalho and penalty was signalled. Zidane scored, although Ricardo dived the right way, he could not stop it from going into the back of the net.

On the second half, the french just kept back, spending most of the time defending and slowing down the game. But heck, they were doing their job (*Sigh*). The few times that Portugal succeeded in breaking the french collossal defense, the portuguese players didn't manage to score. There was a bit of luck missing, I guess.

Let's hope we have better luck next saturday against Germany.

Anyway, congratulations France (Y)

(Sorry if my football vocabulary isn't the best but english is not my mother tongue).

first off: i was never a huge metallica fan. i tend to turn the radio whenever they come on.

second: i've been in several bands that all feel the need to cover metallica, probably fueling my lack of appreciation.

third: mustaine rules all!

that said, i'd have to say dyers eve or breadfan

Exactly.

I was against Portugal due to that little kid Ronaldo. Anyways England and Portugal have both lost and France go through. End off. :yes:

most of you are not for France, you were against Portugal. (you would have been against any other team that would have pwned you)

just because you got owned by them, again !

shame on you.

Most of us had good reason to be against Portugal - I'm not English, nor an English supporter by any means - but watching three games in which Portugal featured really shows what kind of team they are. For the few genuine, decent players on the Portugese team (notably Maniche and Deco), they are hopelessly overshadowed by the antics of the turf-smitten players (C.Ronaldo, Figo). I believe on the whole, the Portugese team is a great team. It's just the poor sportmanship shown by a few players that smears the team's image as a whole.

Props do go to the Portugese supporters in this thread; they haven't resorted to blaming the French team for their loss.

I've highlighted the relevant points. :p

Exactly. Any diving or over-exaggerating is cheating.

I wouldn't call it cheating. They were just desperate to get anything in their favor and they failed doing it.

It's obviously not in their favour if they need to play act for it. It's either a foul or it isn't... diving to the ground isn't helping the ref make a decision - it's cheating in an attempt to gain an unfair advantage. I was very surprised when Henry, for France, dived in one of the earlier games - I didn't expect that sort of behaviour from a player of his calibre. It's got to the stage where players feel they have to dive to get an advantage as otherwise the opposition is only going to do the same thing. It is FIFA's fault for not keeping up with technology - now with almost instant action replays fans sitting at come can make better judgements than the ref on the pitch and that is wrong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!