Recommended Posts

After reading this, my IQ went down. I really do feel dumber after reading this. What's scarier is that someone could actually believe this load of crap. Reasons like this are why the world is, well the way it is.

  • 2 weeks later...
It could be a large, crudely painted balloon, held in place by helium and propelled by tiny sails and rudders (which is why it moves across the sky so slowly)
Do an experiment: take a rubber ball and suspend it above a bathtub full of water. Now slowly move the ball closer to the water. Does the level of the water change? Not even slightly. So much for the tides myth.

...and then I stopped reading.

This object could be anything, from an unusually round rock on a dark surface to someone’s bald head.

nuff said

These people are losers, i mean you can say that about anything you can't touch;

"Prove to me that black holes exist, hahaha you can't so they don't."

well you should hold the position that something doesn't exist until at least some evidence is given for it.

even a mathematical proof is enough

You're all SOOO NAIVE!

Do you see those shadows? Two different directions!

fake5.jpg

A picture is worth a 1000 words.

fake1.JPG

No stars. Where are the f*cking stars? Do you know where they are?

fake4.jpg

This is Nevada!

God, I feel SOOO sorry for you people.

Someone needs to go back to Physics and learn about optics and light..... sheesh... especially with the "no stars"... bright subject over darck background... gee i wonder if a star would ever show up on that kinda contrast? nope... would take a pretty bright star to.. the foreground subjects are just to bright... then another thing hte light is different on the moon with no atmosphere to scatter the light... and it reflects off the moon thats how you get wierd lightning effects like that... you can have shaddows in all kinda directions when you have light bouncing off every other side and mound on the moon... its not like on earth... the moon is a lot more reflective then dirt here

that's almost as bad as the people that say "how is the flat flapping in the wind when there is no air or wind in space!"... the flat was metalic.. it was made to stand out like that...

You're saying there isn't even Mathematical Proof of the Moon existing?

There are mathematical proofs that it exists... NASA has had them for decades with doing research on the moons gravataional pull on the earth which causes the earth to slightly bulge out towards the moon which is how you cause tidal waves... which um strangely time themselves with the moon... also there is a bulge in the moon caused by the earths gavity... they did all the math on this and the math proves its there

...and then I stopped reading.

nuff said

wow these people need to learn physics and how much mass it takes to have a gravatational effect on something else to cause a wave

I'm sorry....why is this thread not in the garbage yet??? I cannot believe to this day, people are still considering these preposterous allegations.....Maybe one day when there will be commercial flights to the moon people will finally put this bull-doodoo conspiracy theory to rest!

I'm sorry....why is this thread not in the garbage yet??? I cannot believe to this day, people are still considering these preposterous allegations.....Maybe one day when there will be commercial flights to the moon people will finally put this bull-doodoo conspiracy theory to rest!

Psh no they will still say "in 1969 we never went to the moon"

I'm sorry....why is this thread not in the garbage yet??? I cannot believe to this day, people are still considering these preposterous allegations.....Maybe one day when there will be commercial flights to the moon people will finally put this bull-doodoo conspiracy theory to rest!

This thread certainly is ridiculous. Every so often people come in and think that the website is genuine and not just a spoof. Can you believe it? Hahahaha! And they even get riled up about it! Hahahaha!

it took me a total of 2 seconds to find holes in his story:

No photographs were ever taken of the moon until the 1850’s.

That's because there were no cameras.

The first permanent photograph was made in 1826 by Joseph Nic?phore Ni?pce using a sliding wooden box camera made by Charles and Vincent Chevalier in Paris. Ni?pce built on a discovery by Johann Heinrich Schultz
the commercial camera was later developed in the 1850's.

Why are there sooo many conspiracy theorists who have nothing better to do then figure out how something scientifically proven can be nothing more than a show put on by the government. It's the moon, it's been there forever and that's the end of the story. I bet they have so much time on their hands because they don't have a job, they worry that the government is taking their tax dollars and casting holograms of the moon into the sky to fool everyone into thinking there really is a moon, like if they didn't anyone would give a rat's arse, hehe.

I just get tired of reading all of this BS night and day and these people that come up with bogus stories to try to prove something wrong and that all of our lives are staged by the government. The government can care less about you, just get over it and find something else to do. Yes, all the government has to do all day is think of cover-ups and conspiracies to somehow mislead us. Granted the government is not perfect but to say they are doing all this stuff on purpose for no Real purpose is just retarded.

Anyways just my 2 cents...

"However, that is also their undoing. The moon is often visible during the day, when the sun is out. The sun is so bright that you cannot even see stars during the day. And the stars generate their own light! As anyone can see at night, the moon, though larger, does not shine as brightly as the stars. So if the moon is a celestial body as they claim, it could only be seen when the stars are seen first. Yet the moon can be seen in the day

as well as the night. Clearly it must exist within our atmosphere, just like its neighbours, the clouds."

well that shows how much of an idiot he is

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!