Recommended Posts

You pay for MSDN you dont pay for vista so dont use that excuse.

Several past Vista beta releases have been included in the MSDN subscriptions. By your logic, MSDN subscribers are not paying for anything since all products are included and represented in the subscriptions equally. Therefore, MSDN users are paying for access to this Vista release (although indirectly, I suppose) and the original poster's comment is valid.

When is MSDN gonna get there hands on this bad boy????

People asked for it, and here it is, Windows Vista RC2! We wanted you to be

the first to get these bits; next week they'll be available to a broader set

of customers via MSDN and TechNet.

All your great feedback has helped us focus on nothing but bug fixes over

the past month since RC 1 - each and every day. There are thousands of

quality improvements since Windows Vista RC1. You'll probably notice

improvements in performance, application compatibility, as well as fit and

finish work. We will continue improving quality until RTM. If you are an

ISV, please use this build (certainly at least RC1 or later) to get

certified. Visit www.innovateonvista.com for more information on logo

certification.

You are integral to this creation and refinement process. We are just

around the corner from RTM and shipping this great product to the world.

This will be the last build made available prior to RTM, so please keep the

feedback coming so we can hit the finish line.

Thanks for your help in finishing the job!

jim [allchin]

Yes but its tiring to see people complain that they pay for MSDN so they then should be entitled to it before anyone. They are paying for access to MSDN not for Vista itself.

On that point, I definitely agree. However, I'd like to take it a step further and say that MSDN subscribers are at least entitled to receive it at the same time that Connect users do (if it's a build slated for release to both groups).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!