OMG, I got a warning! Now what?


Recommended Posts

Thats harsh...my sig was over the limit the other day and I wasn't PM'ed but thats a different story...you must get 3 strikes then your warned surely?

I don't think so. This has happened to me before. I got a warning for my signature before straight away. I'm on 60% at the moment. 2 for signatures, and the other was because I accidentaly made a racist comment when talking about how England was going downhill.

Speaking of that, I believe that that happened more than 6 months ago, and I haven't had a warning reduction yet. The rules state that your warning goes away after 6 months.

P.S. To the moderators: Is it possible for me to appeal my ban? Mine was an accident, because I forgot to change one of the pictures from .jpg to .png. Like I mentioned in my last post on this thread, I forgot the name of the guy that banned me.

Is it possible at all to somehow make it to where mods only get a certain amount of warnings they can hand out?

You have your different branches of mods then you have the Supervisors and Admins. I'd say take the lowest branch, your average Mod and they only get like 5 warnings they could give out for that day. Up to the next branch of Mod and they get like 10 and so on.

I've also seen mods that have deleted posts or signatures for no reason at all. I also saw some give out warnings over something pretty small and stupid that didn't break any rules at all, but they got a warning anyway because the mod put their personal hatred of the person into their decision. There's a few mods on here that really hate when they've been proven wrong in things and take it out on them using their mod position.

It's obviously a pretty big issue that's being ignored. Mostly because these mods know how to clear their tracks to make it look like they're not abusing their positions.

I haven't had any real issues personally with any mod lately. But a while back there was one who would constantly delete my posts simply because I proved him wrong in a quote he posted. At one time when I was replying in a thread over something. After I hit Add Reply, the page loaded and my post had already been edited by that mod. I have high speed internet. When I click Add Reply on this page it's maybe 1.5 seconds before I see it added. Now exactly how was he able to edit soo quickly as if he was actually watching as I typed it out? Others in the thread actually noticed how my post time and his edit time were exactly the same and some of their posts got removed. I had screenshots of all that and sent them to an admin and never got an answer. It made me wonder if the PM I sent ever made it to the Admin at all. So I dropped the issue and eventually he gave up after about a month of acting very immature.

Right now, I'm not complaining. Just getting my 2 cents in on this because I've seen the issue that many people are bringing up and seeing some mods say that it doesn't exist really aggravates me when me and others know for a fact that it does.

My honest opinion of the warning system is that it's like the post counts. There's really no good reason at all to have it. It doesn't solve anything and a lot of immature people will purposely come in here and act stupid just to see how fast they can get it up to 100%

Whats up is a friend of mine got a warning from a particular admin for using the word "fanboy" in a write up, which wasn't even referring to a single person. This was NOT against the specific policy but was warned anyways, and ive heard other complains about the same mod. Also I had some legitimate concerns that I needed addressed and all PM's sent to the admins are constantly ignored. Rather rude dont you think.. i know i know..im the rude one right..cya

PS: if you care about the issues, perhaps u should delete your post and mine and we can discuss it through PM's, if you can be bothered to use that feature.

PM mods or even supers... admins aren't here to deal with small concerns like this... they are responsible for maintain the site, coding, advertising, and paying the bills etc.... Mods and supers are here to deal with warns... if you feel you've been (or your friend) has been warned for something that wasn't bad... then PM a supervisor... aka mods on steroids.

Is it possible at all to somehow make it to where mods only get a certain amount of warnings they can hand out?

You have your different branches of mods then you have the Supervisors and Admins. I'd say take the lowest branch, your average Mod and they only get like 5 warnings they could give out for that day. Up to the next branch of Mod and they get like 10 and so on.

What if thats the only mod on for that period of time (which happens a lot)... and there is a revolt, outbreak of problem members, massive spam attack, etc...

They'd be screwed. That concept is out the window right there.

Also... we only have around 5 warns a day on average... so your idea that we are handing out warnings left and right is also wrong.

Edited by shockz
I got a warning today about my signature exceeding the file size limit. I forgot to change my main picture in my signature to the .png version I had saved, so that's why it went over. I want to appeal this ban, but I can't remember who banned me. I got the message today, but I deleted it.

Ok firstly it was a warn you recieved, not a ban, otherwise you wouldnt be able to post right now.

Secondly, why dont you give all the information if you are going to take something like this publice... i.e how many times had you disobade(sp?) that rule on signature sizes?

Whats up is a friend of mine got a warning from a particular admin for using the word "fanboy" in a write up, which wasn't even referring to a single person. This was NOT against the specific policy but was warned anyways, and ive heard other complains about the same mod. Also I had some legitimate concerns that I needed addressed and all PM's sent to the admins are constantly ignored. Rather rude dont you think.. i know i know..im the rude one right..cya

PS: if you care about the issues, perhaps u should delete your post and mine and we can discuss it through PM's, if you can be bothered to use that feature.

Look, the admins and mods have a lot if not hundreds of PM's every day.

I used to think along the same lines as you, but realise now that Neowin is a free for all community and the mods and admins do their best and a damn good job at keeping the place great.

Thats not to say there ARE one or two mods who are somewhat power hungry, but if you keep your nose clean you wont run in to issues with them.

Warns come and go and they dont realy mean anything, so just live with it like everyone else does.

I like how people complaining they got warned for a signature violation forget to mention they had 6 unwarned sig violations in the past. How lenient should we be?

Yes i thought that may be the case. However, why dont you just remove the posts and close the thread? I didnt think these things where up for discussion in the public domain? (not that im telling you how to do your job Mr, bangbang sir :rofl: )

i have a warning and well i have to admit that this makes me feel a bit safer knowing that our mods are doing their job what is the point of a moderation team if they arent going to moderate anything.

My warning came about when I posted a link to Britney Spears looking a bit naked and I understand why it happened I bitched and even left the forum for a good month after it happened...but then realised that the mod was in his jurisdiction to do it so got on with my business...

Then why is nothing done about these rediculous examples of authority.

If it concerns a nmod/fmod/gmod then complain to a Supervisor. If it concerns a Supervisor then complain to an Admin.

But do not bother to complain about what happened to a friend. We are only interested in hearing from the actual source. Just like in court, hearsay is inadmissible.

Please do not discuss specific warnings in this thread. This thread is to discuss the overall process. Posts that do not adhere to this may be deleted at any time.

Then why is nothing done about these rediculous examples of authority.

Because people like you annoy them so much that they snap. They are only human, so if people didn't annoy them, it would be fine.

I'm not saying I've never caused trouble, I'm on a 60% warn, it came down from 80%. I complained about 1 warn to a super, I didn't get it removed, but thats fine.

You earn respect, you don't demand it.

Because people like you annoy them so much that they snap. They are only human, so if people didn't annoy them, it would be fine.

I'm not saying I've never caused trouble, I'm on a 60% warn, it came down from 80%. I complained about 1 warn to a super, I didn't get it removed, but thats fine.

You earn respect, you don't demand it.

lol..your funny.

Anyways, I will continue to PM the admins with my concerns until i get a response. As I stated previously

If it concerns a nmod/fmod/gmod then complain to a Supervisor. If it concerns a Supervisor then complain to an Admin.

But do not bother to complain about what happened to a friend. We are only interested in hearing from the actual source. Just like in court, hearsay is inadmissible.

Please do not discuss specific warnings in this thread. This thread is to discuss the overall process. Posts that do not adhere to this may be deleted at any time.

Anyways, I will continue to PM the admins with my concerns until i get a response. As I stated previously

Is it a super's actions that are being questioned?

My contribution to this thread that keeps popping up on the main page... Maybe instead of mods and supers we could get a user vote kick option like many multiplayer games and when we've heard enough of your whining and enough peeps want you gone, you'll be gone :p

Ignore'em, its that or i'm about to start PMing admins myself just so they can come in here and clean this mess up plus shut this guy up.

/me looks for the ignore button.

...Maybe instead of mods and supers we could get a user vote kick option like many multiplayer games and when we've heard enough of your whining and enough peeps want you gone, you'll be gone :p

I second this notion. :yes: lol.

My contribution to this thread that keeps popping up on the main page... Maybe instead of mods and supers we could get a user vote kick option like many multiplayer games and when we've heard enough of your whining and enough peeps want you gone, you'll be gone :p

If someone annoys you, use the ignore feature.

It is for a mod to decide whether a rule is broken, not members. It would be abused like no tomorrow.

If someone annoys you, use the ignore feature.

It is for a mod to decide whether a rule is broken, not members. It would be abused like no tomorrow.

+1, members even abuse the "rate user" thing in the profiles. How would you like to be banned because apple fans didn't like your post about vista, or vice versa. Welcome to the internet people. The mods are there for a reason. If you don't like it, tough, its not like anyone is actually forcing you to be here :p

And to the "vegetable" joke, imo Radish is one of the better mods on here, theres a lot worse on other forums. They do their job, and you subconsciously appreciate it - how would you like a forum completely full of Spam and unruly members.

Oh, and on a lighter note, a Radish isnt a vegetable, its the root of a plant which happens to be edible :p

lol..your funny.

Anyways, I will continue to PM the admins with my concerns until i get a response. As I stated previously

Your friend has the right to take his issue to an Admin.

We are not typically interested in hearing from 3rd parties. That is probably why you haven't heard a response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!