OMG, I got a warning! Now what?


Recommended Posts

Care to explain then, why moderators don't reply when you try to appeal an error? You're simply ignored by certain moderators. Now tell me that doesn't hurt their power-abusing reputation that many agree with.

I don't know the circumstances so I can't speak on what happened. If they don't get back to you within a couple days, send something to one or two supervisors. I know the mods don't spend every hour of every day here. If I'm busy at work or in life, a week may go by without being here.

I think you'll find that the only people who think mods abuse their powers are those with high warning levels. If a mod really was abusing their powers, an admin would take care of them. If you think someone is abusing their powers, send something to a supervisor or two.

I would like to add something, I got 20% once for calling a fellow footy fan a sap at some comments he had made about a game.

A sap is like a way of saying someone is a bit wet in their thinking and something not nasty.

I think that sometimes moderators from the USA and Canada should look into the language of other countries, their slang and their isms to understand that calling someone a sap is not insulting.

Neowin is world wide, like in canada fanny means arse, in Britain it means the complete opposite.

Poof in Canada means 'to be gone' Poof in Britain don't mean that.

Ohh well, I probably should have 40% more warning percentage so as I said couple weeks ago it's give-n-take and I do not go out of my way to insult anyone deliberately, unlike some Guinness drinkers I know! ha ha ha ha

Care to explain then, why moderators don't reply when you try to appeal an error? You're simply ignored by certain moderators.

One supervisor gave me a warn for a link in my sig after it appeared again once he removed it....

It turns out after i appealed that it was a problem on his page refresh end...he apologized, removed the warn..and sent me flowers in the post...

Another removed a warn after a few months of considering it, ... some mods dont reply to posts because they either dont want to, or perhaps are sick listening to certain members...

I know im on certain mods sick of you list :cry:

I try to keep the head down . . i think you should do the same..it'l blow over and in time forgotten.

- Brian

Ohh well, I probably should have 40% more warning percentage so as I said couple weeks ago it's give-n-take and I do not go out of my way to insult anyone deliberately, unlike some Guinness drinkers I know!

mmmhmm Mr poof sap :whistle:

Will that be 20% + 20% or just 20? :o

Same here; I've never been rude in PM's, yet I've only received replies about half of the time. Tell me what PM-ing a supervisor will do? The moderator is the one who witnessed the problem on hand, and whose side do you think a Supervisor is going to take? Really, I'm just being honest. If I went to a police chief about the wrong-doings of an officer, who are they going to believe? Asking others to escalate the issue is futile, so there's no point in even trying.

This is exactly it. Snyper, why do you automatically assume that I've done something wrong? Keep my head down? Please stop making general (and incorrect) assumptions. In any case, I don't regularly PM mods for me to be on their "sick of" list..

I remember PM'ing a certain staff member with PM's that were certainly not vulgar but I still have not gotten a reply.

Then a PM to a Sup would be your next move....

Same here; I've never been rude in PM's, yet I've only received replies about half of the time. Tell me what PM-ing a supervisor will do? The moderator is the one who witnessed the problem on hand, and whose side do you think a Supervisor is going to take? Really, I'm just being honest. If I went to a police chief about the wrong-doings of an officer, who are they going to believe? Asking others to escalate the issue is futile, so there's no point in even trying.

Well, I am sure that you know that a Supervisor is above a fMod or GMod. They have the ability to confer with the mods and come to a successful resolution of the issue. I have seen this work many times........ successfully.

I assure you that the Neowin staff is not in the business of warning or axing members for unjust reasons. We want happy, contributing members here..... :yes:

Barney

Same here; I've never been rude in PM's, yet I've only received replies about half of the time. Tell me what PM-ing a supervisor will do? The moderator is the one who witnessed the problem on hand, and whose side do you think a Supervisor is going to take? Really, I'm just being honest. If I went to a police chief about the wrong-doings of an officer, who are they going to believe? Asking others to escalate the issue is futile, so there's no point in even trying.

We document everything, so it's not a big reach for the sup to see what happened.

You claim it's futile yet it sounds like you've never even tried. Granted, a huge majority of the time the supervisor will agree with the mod, simply because the things that we warn over are obviously against the rules

I've had a couple warnings overturned because the sup didn't agree with me.

I assure you that the Neowin staff is not in the business of axing members for unjust reasons. We want happy, contributing members here...

Rumor has it that theres a quota of member bans that mods have to reach before they make gmod? :huh:

Mr Snyper, suprised you never got banned for some of those jokes and jokettes you post.

The one about fred derf having sex with an alligator wasnt a joke. It was meant for "RWI"

Rumor has it that theres a quota of member bans that mods have to reach before they make gmod? :huh:

That reminds me, sorry to digress of the law n order in Britain, a.k.a. Police.

I wonder if the mods want to become cyber-coppers.

They aren't allowed to have and/or change a signature and avatar We only put a 'restricted profile' mask on and warn someone when we have had to edit their sig multiple times.

O.K. thanks, something I have learnt today.

Rumor has it that theres a quota of member bans that mods have to reach before they make gmod? :huh:

:laugh: That is indeed a rumor with no merit............. I can count the bans I have given out on one hand (except spammers, that is).

Rumor has it that theres a quota of member bans that mods have to reach before they make gmod? :huh:

The one about fred derf having sex with an alligator wasnt a joke. It was meant for "RWI"

The quota is quite high. Although bans and posting restrictions count for multiple warnings so that makes it a little easier ;)

Rumor has it that theres a quota of member bans that mods have to reach before they make gmod? :huh:

The one about fred derf having sex with an alligator wasnt a joke. It was meant for "RWI"

One word for you snyper as you told me how many sites you got banned from 'Apoptosis'.

I bet you would get a squillion warnings if you posted that sentence I told you. ha ha ha ha

I am a coward thats why I did not.

The one about fred derf having sex with an alligator wasnt a joke. It was meant for "RWI"

Shhhhhhh - where my aligator goes is up to me ;)

Back on topic: id say theres probably 1 power hungry mod who i wont name, but 1 out of god knows how many is good in my opinion - many other sites have much worse. The only person who doesnt seem to reply to PMs is Redmak - but i guess he's busy - as i havent seen him around the forums for a while. Most of the supers and the other admins usually reply same day (better than UPS imo :p)

And congrats on the green badge Barney :)

whose side do you think a Supervisor is going to take? Really, I'm just being honest. If I went to a police chief about the wrong-doings of an officer, who are they going to believe? Asking others to escalate the issue is futile, so there's no point in even trying.

I've had quite a few things I've done reversed by supervisors...

You were never targetted, nor is anyone. When you break the rules, you are warned by whatever staffer sees it first.

My question is, why even bother replying to these people who post these things? Why not just PM them regarding it instead of keeping it in the public domain as you guys try to avoid?

Actually, Chad, you claimed to have had to edit my signature 4! times, however, if you had looked at my warning logs, you would have noticed that I got warned once for calling someone an idiot, once again for circumventing the word filter, once for being a troll, AND THEN because my sig was 26kb over the 50kb limit. I only see 1 sig warning here. That adds up to the 80% I have now, and you restricted my profile because you said you had to edit my sig 4 times. Which is plainly not true, and, <snipped>

Bans and warns as far as i know are not handed out for everything. I had my sig snipped a number of times and never recieved a warning etc, however im sure i would do if it goes over the limit again... the mods etc are only so lenient.

Care to explain then, why moderators don't reply when you try to appeal an error? You're simply ignored by certain moderators. Now tell me that doesn't hurt their power-abusing reputation that many agree with (not saying I share that view, I've just read about it).

I for one can confirm they do reply... after a lot of PM's... but they do reply. I got on Neobonds nerves once with the ammount of PM's i sent and lets just say i got my well deserved reply... Remember that the mods etc are human beings as well and not being paid for this job, so dont expect to get a reply straight away and dont always expect it to be what you want to hear.

I would like to add something, I got 20% once for calling a fellow footy fan a sap at some comments he had made about a game.

A sap is like a way of saying someone is a bit wet in their thinking and something not nasty.

I think that sometimes moderators from the USA and Canada should look into the language of other countries, their slang and their isms to understand that calling someone a sap is not insulting.

Neowin is world wide, like in canada fanny means arse, in Britain it means the complete opposite.

Poof in Canada means 'to be gone' Poof in Britain don't mean that.

Ohh well, I probably should have 40% more warning percentage so as I said couple weeks ago it's give-n-take and I do not go out of my way to insult anyone deliberately, unlike some Guinness drinkers I know! ha ha ha ha

You can tell when someone is being insulting to another person, even if you do not understand the insult. You can usually go by the way words are being used and the feel of the thread before hand, so even if it means something in another country you will most likely still get a warn if you are using it in an insulting contex.

The one about fred derf having sex with an alligator wasnt a joke. It was meant for "RWI"

Ahhhhhh! The memories! I saw those pictures and they are not very nice at all! That poor alligator!

BANSTICK!

Walks away from thread slowely backward whilst bowing to Mr Allen.

Runs and takes BANSTICK and runs away quickly... Do you think he noticed?

My question is, why even bother replying to these people who post these things? Why not just PM them regarding it instead of keeping it in the public domain as you guys try to avoid?

As long as the question isn't about an individual there's no reason to take it privately. Perhaps others felt the same and i wanted to set the record straight

  • 1 month later...

I got the same warning for the same offence within 24hours. So I got two warnings, so from zero to 40 oranges.

I had 40 oranges.

The other day I got a nice message thanking me for my good behaviour for 6 months and one was removed.

I now have 20 oranges.

What gives, I thought I would have them both removed, or do I have to wait another 6 months to hit zero?

Edited by leesmithg
I got the same warning for the same offence within 24hours. So I got tow warnings, so from zero to 40 oranges.

I had 40 oranges.

The other day I got a nice message thanking me for my good behaviour for 6 months and one was removed.

I now have 20 oranges.

What gives, I thought I would have them both removed, or do I have to wait another 6 months to hit zero?

Yes, they expire consecutively and not concurrently.

Yes, they expire consecutively and not concurrently.

But as both warns where for the same offence, shouldnt one be removed because it was a mistake and one removed as its 6 months good behavour?

Then again i dont know what the warn(s) where for or the history behind it and can only go on what i see here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!