Vista, Office 2007 cracked. Kind of.


Recommended Posts

"I have done some minor upgrades to my computer in the last few years but each upgrade has taken a long time to save up for. And as for my 500 GB hard drive i purchased last week, it took me from August 2006-October 2006 to save up the $203 for that and an SATA Raid card off of newegg.com. Also, I never said my family only made $600 a month. :blink:"

Then why quote whay you didn't look into? I never said your family made $600 a month, but if you read the ENTIRE thread, you'll come to terms with the reference.... back on page four Pitreck wrote

"You still don't get it, that there are countries, where you are not a student, you work 8 hours a day and earn 180-600$ per month, do you? And that's for majority of people, many of them with higher education. And no, it's not some third world. Czech Republic, Poland, Ukraine, Slovenia, Slovakia, Hungary... it would be easier to count countries that can afford it, than those who can't. And I would risk the statement, that there is over a billion of people over the world, who are using pirated Windows and would like to go genuine, but they can't afford it."

And we're on the same page, people just want to get paid for the work they do.....

What makes me laugh is the people who say they can't afford to buy Windows yet run an SLi'd conroe rig with HD monitor :no:

True, but you can't download and crack Processors and HD monitors. If that was actually possible, ever, then people will do it.

What makes me laugh is the people who say they can't afford to buy Windows yet run an SLi'd conroe rig with HD monitor :no:

No, it makes sense that they are trying to save a few bucks. Upgrading your computer can be VERY expensive, having to shell out another $3-400 for a new operating system might be over the top.

After all these years and you still didn't get it!!!!!!!!

"Microsoft takes from the rich and give to the poor and scientific stuff" that's Bill's policy

Microsoft knows that it's being stolen by people (specially home users), but also they know any firm or institution are going to buy their legal copies to run their business legally.

Also some people like to buy the "original" dvd or cd and Microsoft lovely packages and online support ....bla bla bla ok that's it!

What about the majority of users? well, they are NOT rich and they are not going to live in the 20th century and say i'm using NOW windows 95 which is free now :p !!!!

And so:

Microsoft steal rich people and you steal microsoft, and after all Microsoft stole more than you :p

And then Microsoft donates what it stolen to give it for non-profit organizations .... etc.

The point is stealing Microsoft is normal, THEY WANT TO, However they put OGA,WGA stuff to nag your life. And finally they make high profits than you imagine because of their high prices.

lol Windows 95 free? Since when?

True, but you can't download and crack Processors and HD monitors. If that was actually possible, ever, then people will do it.

but I'm sure people still steal them

Piracy = theft.

WRONG!

Piracy may well be wrong, but it is NOT theft, it's illegally making a COPY of something, when someone pirates they do not take away the resource that was there in the first place, they've created a second resource that they then use, albeit at no cost, no effort and illegally.

Ok, how much does it cost now?! which it's out of support too

$1?

What are you talking about?

1) I doubt you can still buy it legally.

2) So what if it is out of support?

3) Find me one legitimate source (a valid Microsoft reseller) selling it for $1

This is why there needs to be stiffer penalties in place for piracy.

If I can't afford a chocolate bar, I don't steal it. If I can't afford a piece of software, I don't steal that either.

It is just common sense.

People always bitch and moan about the cost of software, yet they don't realize the cost of _making_ said software. Software authors are real people with real daily lives. Just as you value your money, so do they.

When you pirate a program that even costs as little as $25, you could be stealing $25 from someone's family. I don't care how big or how small the company is. They work hard to create the software we use, and they deserve to be paid for it.

Just as you deserve to be paid for the work you do.

When you steal a chocolate bar, whoever owned that bar is loosing what the bar cost, because that bar could've been sold to someone else. When you steal software otherwise you wouldn't buy, who's losing money? <- Microsoft knows that. That's why their anti piracy measures are never "radical".

The same article you quote (from 2002)

If you have an issue with the date of the article can provide one that shows different figures? Microsoft's 10/26/2006 10-Q filing still shows an 80% profit margin for the client division.

?indicates the various losses that divisions within microsoft are making:

So your argument is that Window should cost what it does not because that's what it costs to produce but because Windows users have an obligation to fund the Xbox guys while they figure out how to make money selling video games? Fine, I can accept that:

$68 million

+ $43 million

+ $97 million

+ 117 million

= $325 million

That's 13% of the profit from the client division being burnt up subsidizing Microsoft's other ventures. That leaves over two billion dollars in profit. The cost of developing Windows is not the reason it costs what it does. The cost of running Microsoft as a whole is not why Windows costs what it does.

Windows is priced the way it is because they (Microsoft) determined that the current pricing structure is the best way to maximize profit.

Lets not forget the philanthropic side of Microsoft:

If Microsoft want's to give away their profits so be it. That still doesn't change the fact that the price of Windows has relatively little to do with the cost of developing Windows.

I have to admit, I simply couldn't afford it, but when I could afford it and I bought a valid license. But my standard of living was pretty bad and outlaying the money was hard. I don't think I can afford to buy Vista even the upgrades are too pricey for what it is and I need 2GB new ram to run it with games (1GB to run, 1GB for games) (I have 512MB and no free slots). So i'll wait until I really need to upgrade.

Ok, let's for arguments sake that that Piracy is bad. But what about these Licence agreements? Only allowed to install it on one machine and so forth? I agree that software developers should be paid. But to pay them every time you get another computer is completely absurd.

When you steal a chocolate bar, whoever owned that bar is loosing what the bar cost, because that bar could've been sold to someone else. When you steal software otherwise you wouldn't buy, who's losing money? <- Microsoft knows that. That's why their anti piracy measures are never "radical".

Again it's not the same thing. By pirating Windows it doesn't mean someone else could have bought it, someone else will buy it anyway, since software can be DUPLICATED.

Is Microsoft losing money because people are pirating their products? Surely, but it's not because of the same thing as stealing a car, chocolate, or other stupid examples people have given.

What are you talking about?

1) I doubt you can still buy it legally.

2) So what if it is out of support?

3) Find me one legitimate source (a valid Microsoft reseller) selling it for $1

1) No, I would if I found the price of any product reasonable.

2) It means that Microsoft are not responsible that you can't run your other today applications or games on it, simply you are using old OS.... :p (Imagine you have Intel Core 2 Duo with G-Force 8800 GS and you are using Win 95 :pinch: )

3) It's distributed here in my college through a legitimate shop, copied on a CD with it's serial for $3 (students only).

4) Even if it costs $30 at least many people could buy it.

5) I'm talking about the concept not Win 95.

6) I doubt you buy ANY software legally :huh:

7) Why there are pirates then?!

8) Why people distribute their own VLK serials?

9) Why there is FireFox, Linux ...etc?

WRONG!

Piracy may well be wrong, but it is NOT theft, it's illegally making a COPY of something, when someone pirates they do not take away the resource that was there in the first place, they've created a second resource that they then use, albeit at no cost, no effort and illegally.

You must be completely obtuse.

Piracy is the resulting action (also known as robbery, copyright infringement) in that you are obtaining something through illegal means by which you have no legal entitlement. This constitutes theft, and is a criminal offense.

Copyright Infringement is a crime which carries up to a $250,000 fine and up to 5 yrs in prison. In fact there have already been precedents set where people have received sentences of up to 9 yrs in prison in some states.

Look up piracy in the dictionary and you will see the term robbery. Robbery is theft. How much clearer do you need that to be?

No, I don't buy that argument at all.

The majority of people who say "spec me a computer for ?1,000" NEVER get replies including the OS

OS should be included within your budget. If you can't afford a 7950GX2 graphics card and Windows then you'll have to make do with a 7900GS and Windows.

No excuses for piracy!!

"I'm not paying ?300 for an OS with bugs" is a classic!

Not using a valid product key is illegal

You must be completely obtuse.

Piracy is the resulting action (also known as robbery, copyright infringement) in that you are obtaining something through illegal means by which you have no legal entitlement. This constitutes theft, and is a criminal offense.

Copyright Infringement is a crime which carries up to a $250,000 fine and up to 5 yrs in prison. In fact there have already been precedents set where people have received sentences of up to 9 yrs in prison in some states.

Look up piracy in the dictionary and you will see the term robbery. Robbery is theft. How much clearer do you need that to be?

The definition becomes blurred when companies claim losses to piracy when much of that loss is unrealized. From a literal standpoint, you're right: theft is theft. However, it's not as straight-forward as the physical theft of a product. And you can argue that there is ambiguity in how wrong it is to abuse a software license.

This thread still discussing legal or illegal for piracy.

You know what, if we assume that Microsoft or any software company did an unbreakable security system for their software and no one could crack it then there are 3 possibilities:

- People will try to make free stuff WHICH MAY compete with Microsoft products. (Example: See CNet review IE vs. FF)

- Most users worldwide will go for Mac OS or Linux

- Microsoft will lose money, because they can't market their other products WHICH works on their OS WHICH most people couldn't buy it.

If we assumed that there is no OS except Windows then 1/4 of the current computer users worldwide are using computers now.

Simply, Microsoft wants to reduce the level of piracy and NOT eliminating it. In other mean, it makes the job for crackers harder, however Microsoft hope crackers to find a way to crack their software after it achieve the wanted profits first.

Edited by Elagizy

WGA in IE7 isn't that good,, my friend told me that he installed it last night on his 2k3 box and it installed even checking to see if his OS was genuine even tho it was not. :-/

Last time I checked, Windows Server 2003 didn't support Windows Genuine Advantage. Did that change?

WGA in IE7 isn't that good,, my friend told me that he installed it last night on his 2k3 box and it installed even checking to see if his OS was genuine even tho it was not. :-/

Oh, trust me, it is possible to crack WGA on ANY MS application, especially IE7 and WMP11.

why is this still open ! ? EVERYOTHER topic about the cracking of office and vista was closed so why is this till open lol

if i recall talking about warez is a no no on neowin

This is more of an ethical discussion on the topic.

I see no reason to close it as there is some really interesting dialog being passed.

Why can't people just buy the damn software? :no:
Send me money please. I have my pc and also wife's pc to upgrade!

As I always said, if Microsoft put prices a lil bit lower, then many users would upgrade with legit copy.

as for myself, I will not upgrade xp since I have that money asked anymore

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!