Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

that Leopard development was "wrapping up faster than many at Apple even anticipated".

Hahaha... nice ploy there Apple ;) nobody really knows what they are doing, so they can say one date that's way out, and then claim they are finishing faster than expected. This had better be good, because at this point Vista surpasses Apple. Leopard better step up the UI uniformity as well.

IMO Vista doesn't surpass OS X at all. And the Aqua UI is still very nice, and i'd prefer it over Aero any day.

Well I voiced my little opinion so you are entitled to yours ;) But yes, under the hood at the moment Vista has OSX beat. The new technologies are more advanced. OSX is developed by a much smaller company with nowhere near the $6B that MS spends so it's not plausible to think that Apple is up to that standard. They don't have near the corporate customers either to have to offer the advanced features and technologies.

Aqua is nice, yes, but it's become inconsistent between programs and it's been around for what, 6 years? It's time for a change I think. I like the way Aero went and hopefully we will see some innovation from both fronts soon in terms of next gen UI!

Does anyone know what Apple is doing? No, not us, only them. We only get these (kinda lame) builds. I still think we should wait and appreciate the work that we can see at this moment and then criticize after. There's stuff that we can confirm is quite final, like automator and spotlight, that we can criticize.

If they change the interface, fine. IMO Aqua still beats Aero though. Aero is just a bunch of funky effects bundled together. It's not because it's a nice special effect that it must be used, it has to be appropriate, which is the problem of Aero.

OSX is developed by a much smaller company with nowhere near the $6B that MS spends so it's not plausible to think that Apple is up to that standard.

If you truly believe this, I've got some primo swampland to sell you. Don't worry about the alligators in the backyard . . . they're a "feature." ;-)

Looking good, coming along nicely (and that's a small bug list for an entire OS) :yes:

But, i probably won't be getting it, my mac's getting a little long in the tooth, and can't keep up with stuff any more, it's GPU blows, so it's going to become a Linux box, and live out the rest of it's days like that.

Looking good, coming along nicely (and that's a small bug list for an entire OS) :yes:

Compared to what? Mac OS X Tiger? If my memory serves me right Mac OS X Tiger didn't have a bug list nearly as long as Mac OS X Leopard at the same stage. Not to mention that every Mac OS X Tiger beta was pretty much feature complete. Mac OS X Leopard on the other hand is still supposed to receive a whole range of mayor features. Where on Earth is Apple going to find the time to properly beta test those if they still want to go for a 'Spring 2007' release?

I for one don't see how Mac OS X Leopard is 'coming along nicely', at least not by looking at these incomplete betas.

Only time will tell I guess. :p

Edited by .Neo
I see 38 known issues, Vista had 500 or so only a couple of months before RTM.

Windows Vista was a tragedy upon tragedy. I don't think you can compare it's development over the years to the development of Mac OS X.

And considering the size of the OS, and the total amount of code (and that these bugs are spread over multiple app's), it really isn't that many.

The bug list doesn't show any specifics of what's causing the problems and how much code is involved. And again, Mac OS X Leopard is nowhere near feature complete (if we have to take Apple's word for it). So for us there's no telling how the OS is actually progressing.

The bugs that have cropped up I think are from Apple removing major components of the operating system. They are just giving developers the core API's they will need to develop applications and all the good stuff these "Top Secret" features are being held back and subsequently removed from each ADC build. After-all they are not beta testing the OS they are receiving Beta builds so they can keep their applications updated and compatible.

We shouldn't base our opinion on builds developers are receiving.

The bugs that have cropped up I think are from Apple removing major components of the operating system. They are just giving developers the core API's they will need to develop applications and all the good stuff these "Top Secret" features are being held back and subsequently removed from each ADC build. After-all they are not beta testing the OS they are receiving Beta builds so they can keep their applications updated and compatible.

We shouldn't base our opinion on builds developers are receiving.

I agree. I believe that what we're seeing is more of a "baby Leopard" to give developers a chance to prepare their apps. I think that Leopard is going to resemble iPhone's interface quite a lot, and of course, we haven't seen those top secret features yet. Apple are hiding something from us...
The new technologies are more advanced. OSX is developed by a much smaller company with nowhere near the $6B that MS spends so it's not plausible to think that Apple is up to that standard. They don't have near the corporate customers either to have to offer the advanced features and technologies.
Does Vista have anything similar to Core Image, Core Video, Core Animation or Quartz? (That's a genuine question by the way, don't flame me).
Well I voiced my little opinion so you are entitled to yours ;) But yes, under the hood at the moment Vista has OSX beat. The new technologies are more advanced. OSX is developed by a much smaller company with nowhere near the $6B that MS spends so it's not plausible to think that Apple is up to that standard. They don't have near the corporate customers either to have to offer the advanced features and technologies.

It's not the amount of dollars they spend on an OS. But what they spend it on.

You can spend well over 6 billion dollars and develop the worst operating system in the 21st century.

It really depends on the resource that they have, which the staff is one of the key contribution of it all.

It looks to me as though they put a lot of effort into the new UI for Automator, which gives the impression (to me, at least) that Leopard may have a Unified appearance for most of the prior Brushed apps.

I hope I'm wrong. Though an entire new UI for Leopard would be very nice, Apple is sure sending some mixed signals that would cause one to think otherwise.

^^no as has been stated millions of times before here on Neowin: the OS X increments such as 10.3 Panther, 10.4 Tiger, 10.5 Leopard are the same as in the Windows world XP would be to Vista....but 10.4.1 with the .1 at the end is Tiger with a service pack if you will.

Does Vista have anything similar to Core Image, Core Video, Core Animation or Quartz? (That's a genuine question by the way, don't flame me).

Aero/WDM is pretty much the parallel. Not that well developed though, but that's expected from a first release.

The Desktop Window Manager is similar to
in
in that applications do not draw directly to screen, but instead draw to off-screen buffers that are then composited by the window manager and displayed on-screen. This allows the window manager to easily create a number of on-screen effects found in Windows Vista. These include translucent window borders...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's Copilot Cowork now generally available with usage-based billing by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in March, Microsoft first revealed Copilot Cowork, a new agentic AI experience in Microsoft 365 Copilot through which users can assign tasks to AI to complete in the background. After testing the service with a limited set of customers in Research Preview for a few weeks, Microsoft announced the general availability of Copilot Cowork to customers in the Frontier program on March 30. Today, Microsoft announced the general availability of Copilot Cowork worldwide for Microsoft 365 Copilot customers. The company also highlighted that Cowork became the fastest-growing feature in the history of its Frontier program. Unlike regular Copilot Chat, Copilot Cowork can run complex, long-running, multi-tool tasks from start to finish in the cloud by using organizational context through Work IQ. When compared to Claude Cowork, Microsoft claims that Copilot Cowork will be 30% to 40% cheaper on average with its Microsoft 365 connector. For now, Copilot Cowork runs on Anthropic models, including Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6. However, Frontier customers can now use GPT-5.5. Microsoft also announced Cowork 1, a secure fine-tuned model coming in the next few weeks, which is designed to handle everyday Copilot tasks at a lower cost. To access Copilot Cowork, a Microsoft 365 Copilot user subscription is required. Usage is billed separately through Copilot Credits, based on model use, context retrieval, tool calls, and runtime. Pay-as-you-go pricing is set at $0.01 per Copilot Credit. To offer IT teams full control over usage costs, Microsoft provides spending limits, usage alerts, user-level controls, reporting, and prepaid usage plans for organizations. Usage-based billing begins today. However, Frontier customers who used Cowork between March 30 and June 16 will not be billed until July 1, 2026. The Microsoft 365 Copilot app now includes a toggle to enter the full Cowork experience. Microsoft is also adding partner plugins, with Enosix, Harvey, LSEG, Miro, monday.com, Moody’s, Morningstar, S&P Global Energy, and TeamsMaestro available now. Adobe, Atlassian, Box, Canva, Databricks, and others are coming soon.
    • With Nova enabled I am not seeing a difference with compactmode.show?
    • HOLY THREAD REVIVAL   But yes, look for browser.nova.enabled and set it to true
    • 5-year subscription to AdGuard VPN price-dropped now 90% off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 88% off a 5-year subscription to AdGuard VPN. In the digital age where internet privacy is paramount, AdGuard VPN emerges as an essential tool. This virtual private network (VPN) is your encrypted gateway to the internet, helping your data stay secure and your online activities remain private, regardless of your location. More than just a privacy tool, AdGuard VPN is a robust solution packed with features that cater to a variety of internet needs. Why AdGuard VPN subscription deal over other VPNs: Exhaustive List of Locations: With 60+ locations available worldwide, you have the freedom to connect from anywhere you want, effectively bypassing geographically restricted content. Check complete list of servers here. Advanced Security Protocol: AdGuard VPN uses its own security protocol, guaranteeing a faster and safer VPN connection. This means you can browse, stream, and download with peace of mind knowing your data is secure. Zero-Logging Policy: Rest assured, your personal data is not collected and your internet traffic stays private at all times, thanks to AdGuard's strict zero-logging policy. Simultaneous Connections: Connect up to 10 devices simultaneously, providing protection for all your devices under just one account. Trusted Developer: AdGuard is a renowned name in the world of computer security, bringing their expertise and commitment to privacy and security to their VPN service. What You Get: Up to 10 devices connected simultaneously All locations Light-speed servers Unlimited data No logs policy Trusted developer Available on all platforms Privacy Created by a team from Russia, AdGuard software Limited is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus. While the country does follow European privacy laws, it's not part of the 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance. Adguard may not properly work in China. Good to know Length of access: 5 years This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Device per license: 10 Access options: desktop & mobile Updates included 5- years of AdGuard VPN normally costs $359.40 without discounts, but it can be yours just $39.97, that's a saving of $324.43 (90%) off. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this 5-year AdGuard VPN deal for just $34.97 (was $359.40) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • KillerPDF 1.5.1 by Razvan Serea KillerPDF is a lightweight, portable PDF editor for Windows built for users who want full control without subscriptions, installers, or telemetry. It runs as a single executable, making it ideal for USB use and field work. You can view PDFs with smooth PDFium rendering, navigate quickly with thumbnails, zoom, and shortcuts, and reorganize pages using drag-and-drop. It supports merging multiple PDFs, splitting documents, and extracting selected pages. KillerPDF also allows inline text editing with font matching to preserve the original layout, plus annotations like text boxes, freehand drawing, highlights, and reusable signatures. You can search full text, copy content easily, and print documents with flattened annotations. Designed as a free and open alternative to bloated PDF tools, it works fully offline on Windows 10/11 x64. No runtimes install. Everything needed is inside the EXE (targets .NET Framework 4.8, which ships with every supported Windows release). KillerPDF key features: High-quality PDF rendering via PDFium Edit PDF text inline (double-click to modify text) Page thumbnails and fast navigation with zoom and shortcuts Merge multiple PDFs into one Split PDFs and extract selected pages Drag-and-drop page reordering Font matching to preserve original document appearance Text boxes for notes Freehand drawing tools Highlight overlays with adjustable color, size, opacity Undo actions and clear per-page annotations Create, draw, and save reusable signatures Click-to-place signatures anywhere Full-text search with highlighted results Drag-select or Ctrl+A to copy text Print with annotations flattened Portable single-file app (~10 MB) No installer, no admin rights required No account, no telemetry KillerPDF 1.5.1 changelog: Performance Save Flattened PDF now uses multiple CPU cores. Page rasterization is parallelized (PNG encoding runs across cores; the PDFium render step stays serialized since the library isn't thread-safe), so large documents flatten significantly faster while the UI stays responsive (#68). Fixed PDFs that failed to open with "Unexpected EOF" now open (#72). The failure was PdfSharpCore's Flate inflater (SharpZipLib) rejecting the FlateDecode cross-reference stream on multi-revision PDFs - files that open fine in browsers, Acrobat, and Foxit. KillerPDF now detects this and re-opens the file losslessly through PDFium, preserving selectable text. Thanks to @javajon for the report and a detailed reproduction. Grid view renders every page. It was capped at the first 26 pages, so longer documents stopped loading partway through. Tiles also stream in progressively now instead of blocking until the whole document is rendered. Grid Ctrl+Scroll no longer reloads every page when the zoom is already at its limit and nothing would change. Removed a stray horizontal scrollbar (a thin green line) that could appear across the bottom of grid view. Files on UNC / network shares (including the WSL \\wsl$ filesystem) are copied locally before opening, avoiding partial-read failures on network filesystems. Changed Minimum zoom lowered from 10% to 5%, so grid view can pack more columns (helpful for wide/landscape pages) and single-page view can zoom out further. Download: KillerPDF 1.5.1 | 6.3 MB (Open Source) Link: KillerPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      111
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!