Neowin Fantasy Baseball Season 2007


Recommended Posts

Sucks to be me.

In one game (Angels vs Tigers) two of my closers blow their save opportunities.

All in all, I had a very sucky week. I had been hoping to gain something from playing the last place team but now he's up in the standings and I am way down.

Also, I happen to have 3 dedicated 2B players and 2 of them are injured (with minor problems). I even have a fourth 2B if you count a multi-position player with 2B eligibility. At this rate, I may need to start him at 2B.

I am not doing too bad. My starting pitchers lost almost all their games this past week but their ERA was around 3 (no run support I suppose). However, my offense picked up the slack (somewhat) to make up for it.

Pitching is my forte so I hope my starters get some run support from their teams for some wins.

I'll pass then. Right now, especially Dunn and Rios, they're my only producers.

Interested in moving Abreu now? Although going 1 for 8 so far tonight is a slight improvement on his 0 for 16 skid (or whatever it ended up to be).

I have five SP getting their starts tomorrow and I may end up sitting one of them. Last week it was a bit of a problem but I figured that with days off between series and the odd rain delay that I would be fine. Instead it got even worse. Oh well, Wednesday night will be do or die night.

I even have two SP facing each other. I guess I'll hope for a 1-0 victory on one hit. Scratch that. A 1-0 victory on a series of errors.

I even have two SP facing each other. I guess I'll hope for a 1-0 victory on one hit. Scratch that. A 1-0 victory on a series of errors.

I actually got that 1-0 victory between my two pitchers. Okay, it wasn't on a series of errors but I don't mind one of my SP getting stuck with 1 ER. My opponent this week is winning all of his starts and getting some wins from the bullpen too.

I'm interested in freeing up a roster spot but there isn't anyone that I want to drop at this time.

Thus I am interested in a two for one trade deal whereby 2 of my players are moved for one "better" player.

Ideally, I'd like to move one of my 2Bs along with one SP for a good outfielder.

bangbang023 is getting smoked 10-1.

At this point it looks like he'll be lucky to exit the week 9-2.

I had a similar matchup two weeks ago but I roared back last week.

I've had no real output from either sides of the game, offense or pitching. It's killed me pretty badly.

The entire point of my trading with L3thal was to solve my surplus 2b problem. Now, we finally came to a deal and guess what... we settled on players that were not second basemen. That was kinda dumb. I guess I lost that deal.

Just picked up a pretty good free agent...

He was available for a while but I would have had to drop two active players to pick him up (because I had someone on the DL who was no longer injured).

On another note, I got some confirmation why I drafted Santana 1st overall. In addition to the win, he had 13 strikeouts, 1.29 ERA and a 0.86 WHIP for last night's game.

Now if only I hadn't started Tim Wakefeld against the Yankees...

Lance Berkman has been a waste of space since I acquired him. The only seemingly uplifting thought is that Troy Glaus started a 0 for 16 slump seemingly the day after he left my team.

Looks like I lost the strikeout race this week. It looks like I'll finish around 61 and L3thal has at least 63 at this point but then again I don't have stat tracker.

It looks like Joe Blanton had a bit of a rough ride so maybe I'll gain the WHIP statistic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!