Apple Safari to be released for the Windows Platform!


Recommended Posts

I guess only more than 2 button mice exist on mars?

Cause Safari won't do page forward and back with side mouse buttons.

Apple can do no wrong.

3. Middle-mouse clicks open new tabs for me.

I love this (currently typing in Safari, WinXP). Started up pretty fast, and loads sites pretty fast. Looks like I'm ditching Firefox as soon as this thing is officially released :D

Edit: After messing around with it, I switched the font smoothing to light, and pages look way better. I'm loving this too much :D

Edited by MGS3-SS
I love this (currently typing in Safari, WinXP). Started up pretty fast, and loads sites pretty fast. Looks like I'm ditching Firefox as soon as this thing is officially released :D
Sites actually load slower for me :\ at least neowin loads significantly slower in Safari than in FF
I thought Apple were a hardware company first and foremost... this move doesn't suggest that.

This move really doesn't say anything about that at all. If they were to release OS X for any general PC, then they would no longer be a hardware company primarily.

I thought Apple were a hardware company first and foremost... this move doesn't suggest that.

They are. Like that other dude said, they're releasing Safari for Windows so that more people can develop widget/apps for iPhone (hardware). So, yeah, they're sneakily supporting iPhone through Safari for Winders.

I'm surprised to hear so many of these problems. Got it right as the page was being updated and installed it on XP. Font rendering is nice, pages load very fast (faster than IE and Firefox), and all mouse buttons work (back, forward, middle-click for tabs) on my Logitch MX500. The inline search is nice, and all sites that I've been to work perfectly (MySpace, Youtube, CNN, Neowin, and more). I wonder why garbled text appears for some people.

So far i like Safari alot more so then IE and FF..

Safari for me is using alot less memory then FF

Doing google searches are alot faster

Just normal website rendering is alot faster..

The only thing that gets me is the font rendering and it being all grey, but like everything it takes a little time getting use to..

Oh and one more thing that bugs me.. I can use my side mouse buttons to go forwar or backwards on websites..

An for those people who want to select the url in the addressbar have u ever thought about just double clicking to select the url? It's alot faster then putting your curser in the bar and use the hotkey to select the text...

Edit: There is one BIG BIG BUG in safari.. Open up a link in a new window and drag that new window over to your second monitor and you'll notice that it'll get hidden but still opened in your taskbar..

Edited by Sn4k36
Ok it's nice. I will admit that. Question though...How can I select the text on a page and drag and drop it? I can only highlight text and thats it. hmm.

Works for me - just highlighted your sentence and dropped it into Word 2007 - didn't work for Notepad, though. Too bad you can't make text clips like on OSX.

The thrill is gone

The thrill is gone away

The thrill is gone baby

- B.B. King

:p

I did seem to render pages faster than IE7 for me but now its about the same (even slower on somepages) looking at non-flash pages that are not in IE7's history and cache for a fair comparison. I even closed and reopened it and no big diffrence in speed now. Ill still wait to see what it can really do when it goes final because I hear really good things about it from Mac users.

How can I import my IE bookmarks into Safari?

I thought Apple were a hardware company first and foremost... this move doesn't suggest that.

They make there money from hardware, considering they have been making Operating Systems for a long time now and apps for there OSs so they are obviously software also.

Also everyone is saying it uses huge memory in Windows, with 3 tabs open under OS X only using 48MB. iTunes has always worked better in OS X then Windows and that seems to be the same in this case. Hopefully by the time the official release is out they have it more optimized for Windows.

I still haven't tried it on Windows but I see from all the problems people are having I can see it's not perfect. I will be installing it on Windows tonight.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!