What was your biggest problem with Windows ME?


Recommended Posts

my biggest problem with win me is simply that it is very out of date for today's hardware .. why would anyone what to run such an ancient OS now? (and why are we still discussing it?)

:p

realistically .. back in the old days I went from 98se to 2000 to xp .. basically i skipped ME as I had no need for the "upgrade" at the time.

Windows ME was probably the worst version of Windows next to Vista. I would like to know, what was your biggest problem with it?

I personally was okay with Windows ME, the only kind of machines that would accept it were those weird machines. I still preferred 2000. Windows ME had one serious bug in Internet Explorer where it would ask you if you wanted to debug on every other website.

Vista is the best version of Windows and 1.0 is the worst version. I never used ME, I went directly from 98 to XP, but from all that I hear, most of ME's compatibility issues (which I think are grossly exaggerated) came from the fact it dropped real-mode DOS, which was present in the older 95 and 98 releases.

And note the reason I never had ME wasn't because of the "bad" things I heard about it, it's simple that I picked up 98 later, probably early 2000 or so, before ME was released, and by the time I needed a new computer, XP had already been out for a year or so.

  • 3 months later...

my experience with ME consisted of:

go to store, come home with at-the-time brand new 1GHz machine for my brother.

connect cables, boot up for the first time.

see winME screen.

see winME crash.

RAGE.

wipe disk in fury and install win2k.

it made a poor impression, quickly.

... most of ME's compatibility issues (which I think are grossly exaggerated) came from the fact it dropped real-mode DOS, which was present in the older 95 and 98 releases.

No, it really was terrible. I had a machine that was "made for" Windows ME and it had full system crashes, quite literally, twice a day on average from the get go. That OS was pure garbage if you ask me.

Rarely used it. Went from NT 4.0 -> Win2k Pro, infrequently dabbling with the consumer releases of Windows for anything other than gaming. In that regard, ME was essentially on par with the experiences I had with 9x. And Vista is the best OS Microsoft has released to date. Most problems I read about could be likely chalked up to PEBKAC or a general overestimation of the persons level of competence.

Vista has been the best but whatever... I don't want to start another flamewar with all the vista haters.

A friend had it on his PC and it was really annoying because it crashed for no apparent reason all of the time.

I agree abt Vista.. I have Ultimate 64 bit and the last time I was this happy with Windows it was when I had Windows 2000.. there was just that "Vista keeps forgetting folder settings thing" but I fixed that and now it runs smoooooth.. anyway.. thread is abt ME so...

What I hate most is that it was C * * P!!

it ran surprisingly well on my system for a month or so.. no crashes at all and then it started to show why ppl hate it.. it crashed even when i maximised a window.. :| started getting on my nerves.. :angry:

Vista has a future because MS is going that direction and because they will maintain it. In contrast, WinME was near DOA (deliberately). Some features it got from 98 were improved (usb, etc), while the new features were butchered on as if ME was a test mule for XP. I think MS just didn't have enough NT programmers to dev the future XP features onto 2k, else they'd have released a 2khome instead of ME. And MS was too cheap to release an SP for SE or maybe sell a halfprice Second And A Half Edition (98s.5e? 98saahe?)

I ran ME from 2000 to 2006. In little ways, the UI was slightly better than 98se, but ME needed reinstalling about every 2+ years (Symptoms: crash frequency increased. or a rash of "VXD" BSODs at bootup, which are incurable.).

Later it seemed the patches must have been sloppy (something I'd watch for as MS lifecycles out XP).

OE6 would go bad, then IE6 would follow. Due to the "migration" to NT inside IE/OE6, there was a strange rigamarole to uninstall IE "completely" (reverts to IE5), then reinstall IE6sp1. If that didn't "take", you'd see the OE5 splash when you started OE6, but the list of dll's would be OE6's. And (some?) of the patches wouldn't show in the Help>About (I can't remember these symptoms exactly)

And stuff like Symantec AV wasn't kept compatible (It another AV piled up 4+GB of crap in the restore folders until Windows ran out of swap space. The restore points were already horked, and the solution was to deltree the crap via DOS boot floppy.)

So by 2006, likely the best way to run WinME was to install, avoid (most) patches, and use it as offline computer. This computer runs XP great on 640kB RAM, btw.

Vista... is on someone else's midrange 2007 laptop (I'm the "tech"), so I haven't worked enough with Vista yet.

IMO, the UAC popups are just a mild extra annoyance. The "copy or replace" (moving files) popup is a mess.

"And Vista is the best OS Microsoft has released to date."

WinV is not yet the best. it'll be best when all hardware is good enough to run it, and when Vista reaches middle-age. Better info will be on the net. (I avoid Vista info from 2006.)

"Most problems I read about could be likely chalked up to PEBKAC or a general overestimation of the persons level of competence."

(Tho Vista PEBKAP is PEBKAP only if the user PEBKAPed the same activity on XP, too. Else Vista is a UE regression.)

Vistas UI seems to be a regression, but that's mostly due to the icons (which seem worse on LCD displays than CRTs). XP's "candy" UI was better than WinV's "muddy" UI, tho the "classic" (9x/2k >>XP) UI is still the best. Also there's more wasted acreage in Vista's UI. Anyone know where Vista's userchrome file is? :-)

Normally, every era software runs best on same era hardware. but ... I maxed (3gb) the ram on that laptop that came w/ Vista, and it's still bizarrely sluggish at times. I haven't researched which services to kill on Vista (or laptops) and I assume some of that crap is the laptop manufacturer's crap. (I did remove mcafee, and that seemed to have been the only pre-installed 3rd party adware garbage on it.)

There was no Vista driver for the laser until months later, and then the driver file was mislabeled (and probably still is) at (Samsung's) site.

BTW Win2000...

before upgrading a 98se Celeron to XP, I tried a spare 2k "seat", but 2k kept losing all of its SP's. Within only a few months it needed frequent "repairs" & reinstalls (all SPs were via MS's SP cd), until the last - 2k was irreparable. I bought XP, cuz I was afraid eventually the hard drive would fill past 2k's "un-SP-ed" max, and the data would be gone after one of those SP reinstalls. So I don't have much impression of running 2k. Otherwise, my ME ran better than that 2k, but the WinME was on AMD. :-)

IE6/OE6 sp1 on the 98se Celeron never needed reinstall, btw. But OE wasn't used much on that one. (Also the Celeron has become sluggish, i think due to accumulated ware and drivers install, remove, etc over almost 4 years. Needs a complete reinstall ... xp sp3 is timely.)

98se was good for days (or longer) without shutdown. ME "needed" shutdown every night. XP is good for months. Vista is good for weeks, but longer I don't know, because more patches seem to require restarts on WinV than on XP.

that was long... :-) {inhale ...}

I did have ME, I built a PC from spares for my fiance's class and not once did it crash.

I suppose using the correct drivers and software only written for ME worked.

XP was great, Vista is better.

Vista is decent. I prefer XP, but Vista is no where as bad as ME.

It crashed on me too, got the BSOD too often. Dont care if it were the drivers or the OS, it crashed too much so i went straight back to 98 SE (which is still the second best Windows OS imo), and stayed with it until 2003, when i finally upgraded to XP.

I did have ME, I built a PC from spares for my fiance's class and not once did it crash.

+1

i used ME for a long time even when xp started becomming the standard and i was enjoying my virus free environment whilst xp was being targetted by that issue/virus that kept rebooting the pc :p

never knew people had issues with ME till 2006~ :D

You know I was getting app. 2 or 3 crashes everyday with ME, but my 9x system weren't any better so I always thought using a computer was just like that in those days. After XP I can't really believe how I put up with that crap for all those years.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094149 / KB5095971 / KB5094156 Setup, Recovery updates by Sayan Sen Earlier this week Microsoft released its newest Patch Tuesday updates (KB5094126 / KB5093998 on Windows 11 and KB5094127 on Windows 10). Alongside those, Microsoft also released new dynamic updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. This time both recovery and setup updates were released for Windows 11 as well as Windows 10. The company writes: "KB5095185: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 26H1: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.28000.2269. KB5094149: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.26100.8655 KB5095971: Setup Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to Windows setup binaries or any files that setup uses for feature updates in Windows 11, version 23H2. KB5094156: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.22621.7219 KB5098815: Windows Recovery Environment update for Windows 10, version 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update automatically applies Safe OS Dynamic Update (KB5094154) to the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) on a running PC. The update installs improvements to Windows recovery features. KB5094154: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, versions 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.19041.7417. KB5094153: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1809 and Windows Server 2019: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.17763.8880. KB5094152: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1607 and Windows Server 2016: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.14393.9234." Microsoft notes that both the Recovery and Setup updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel.
    • Quantum Error Correction Validated in Nature: Microsoft and Quantinuum Log 800-Fold Improvement Two years after the original press-release announcement, independently peer-reviewed results published in Nature on June 10, 2026, have confirmed that Microsoft and Quantinuum achieved an 800-fold reduction in quantum error rates on real trapped-ion hardware — the largest gap between physical and logical error rates ever independently validated.    What Quantum Error Correction Actually Does — and Why Breaking Even Is Hard https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318329/20260613/quantum-error-correction-validated-nature-microsoft-quantinuum-log-800-fold-improvement.htm   Quantum Computing Wiring Bottleneck Cracked by HKU Silicon Carbide Chip at Qubit Temperature Engineers at the University of Hong Kong have built the first cryogenic control chip that operates at the same temperature as superconducting qubits — 10 millikelvin, or just one-hundredth of a degree above absolute zero — without generating the heat that has forced every competing approach to park its electronics hundreds of meters of cable away. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318325/20260613/quantum-computing-wiring-bottleneck-cracked-hku-silicon-carbide-chip-qubit-temperature.htm  
    • RevPDF 4.5.0 by Razvan Serea RevPDF is a free, fully offline PDF editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that lets you edit text and images directly inside PDF files — no internet connection, no account, and no cloud uploads required. Unlike bloated alternatives that demand subscriptions and constant connectivity, RevPDF fits in under 60MB on desktop while delivering a complete editing toolkit: annotate, redact, sign, compress, split, merge, convert, and reorganize pages, all processed locally on your device. Smart font matching ensures edited text blends seamlessly with the original, and multi-language support includes RTL scripts such as Arabic and Hebrew. Where most PDF editors force you to choose between features and simplicity, RevPDF manages both. You can build interactive forms from scratch with text fields, checkboxes, and dropdowns, permanently redact sensitive data before sharing, draw freehand on contracts and diagrams, and add custom watermarks — all without a single file leaving your machine. Edit Text and Images Directly Inside PDFs RevPDF supports true inline PDF editing — not just annotation layers on top of a document, but actual modification of existing text and images within the file. A smart font-matching engine identifies the font used in the original document and applies it automatically when you make edits, so changes blend naturally with the surrounding content. You can reposition elements, resize images, and update text across single pages or entire documents. RevPDF 4.5.0 release notes: This is one of the biggest updates to RevPDF yet. A lot of things people have been asking for are finally here. New Features Auto Redaction Permanently redact sensitive text and areas from your PDFs before sharing. Clean, irreversible, and fully offline. Comments, Links & Bookmarks Add comments for review, insert clickable links, and create bookmarks to jump around long documents without scrolling forever. Find & Replace Search across the whole document and replace text in one go. Long overdue. Split Pages Vertically or Horizontally Split any page down the middle, vertically or horizontally. Perfect for scanned books or double-page spreads. New Drawing Tools More tools for freehand drawing and markup, better for annotations, sketches, and detailed notes. Continuous Scrolling in Editor The editor now scrolls continuously through pages instead of jumping between them. Working through long documents is a lot smoother now. PDF Metadata Editor View and edit the metadata stored inside your PDFs, including title, author, subject, and keywords. Better Font Matching Text edits now blend in more naturally by doing a better job of matching the original font. Tabbed PDF Viewer Open multiple PDFs at once in tabs and switch between them without going back to the home screen. Add Links Insert hyperlinks anywhere in your PDF, to external URLs or to other pages within the document. Share & Print Shortcuts Share or print directly from the editing screen, home screen, and viewer. No extra steps. Minor Updates Paste images directly from clipboard into your PDF New image editing tools for more control over images inside documents Bug Fixes Fixed file saving issues on Windows and Linux Everything still works fully offline. No login, no cloud, no account. Your files stay on your device. Download: RevPDF 4.5.0 | 58.0 MB (Open Source) Links: RevPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshots 1 | 2 Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Interesting. I'm not using a VPN with my phone. I tried though my home internet (Rogers) and my cellular internet (Telus) using their respective DNS servers and both trigger the dialog above.
    • Three days after Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 as the most capable AI model it had ever released to the public, the United States government ordered it switched off — and now the company is refunding customers who paid to use a product that vanished almost overnight https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318342/20260613/us-government-pulls-anthropics-fable-5-offline-now-come-refunds-vanished-ai.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!