What was your biggest problem with Windows ME?


Recommended Posts

Windows was one of the best operating systems I've ever used, in four years of using it I NEVER had a major problem and only had one or two problems towards the end. When I upgraded to XP that's when the problems began. People always say "oh it's rubbish" well not for me I thought it was great. Also the way the buffers worked Windows Me could burn a CD slightly faster than XP good.

Windows was one of the best operating systems I've ever used, in four years of using it I NEVER had a major problem and only had one or two problems towards the end. When I upgraded to XP that's when the problems began. People always say "oh it's rubbish" well not for me I thought it was great. Also the way the buffers worked Windows Me could burn a CD slightly faster than XP could.

The constant annoying sudden crashes and blue screens out of the nothing! That was my biggest problem! lol

Same here. I mean, I was still learning at that point, so it could have very well been partially or completely my fault, but seeing as ME is the universal scapegoat, I'll go with that :D

Well, honestly, I never had a problem with ME that I didn't have with 95/98/98SE.

The reason most people dislike it is because they went into it with expectations of it being better than 98 SE, and it wasn't really. It was pretty similar, stability wise, feature wise (System Restore was new, but eh).

See I knew I wouldn't be on my own.

I really didn't have any problems with it at all. It supported my hardware better than 98, no resource conflicts on a clean install. True it crashed sometimes but no more than any version of Windows 9x, they all crash like crazy. Someone mentioned VxDs, blame the hardware makers for that. WDM was introduced with Windows 98.

My biggest complaint if I had to choose one would be system restore. It obviously was not ready and acted more like an early beta version than a final. Never really got it to work right and turning it off was pointless since it just turned itself on again (and you could never get rid of that annoying _Restore folder). Media Player 7 sucked pretty majorly also. I found a program called System Restore Remover Pro which fixed both those problems though.

There were a lot of improvements over 98. Better hardware support, better network stack, MUCH faster defragmenter (though you can just copy the defrag.exe file from Me to a Windows 98 system if you wish). I think it's just one of those things everyone bashes because it was popular to do so. I'm sure a lot of the haters never even used it.

There were a lot of improvements over 98. Better hardware support, better network stack, MUCH faster defragmenter (though you can just copy the defrag.exe file from Me to a Windows 98 system if you wish). I think it's just one of those things everyone bashes because it was popular to do so. I'm sure a lot of the haters never even used it.

I didn't know about the defrag.exe trick, I might try it some time.

I didn't know about the defrag.exe trick, I might try it some time.

Yeah I found out about it on some tweak site way back when. I always use it now when I install 98 on an old computer. It's a lot faster and it doesn't constantly stop and start over like the one with 98 seemed to do. :)

I think Vista is a lot better OS than Windows ME ever was. I have x64 Ultimate on two personal computers running flawlessly.

Anyway, Windows ME was a sad POS. I installed it on a computer that was running Windows 98SE just fine. Long story short, the install rebooted to complete and then it went to a BSOD and never came up. Broke the CD in half after that and went back to 98se.

Edited by EcPercy

I never had the opportunity to use it, I read the reviews. Went from 98 to 2000 and skipped the ME debacle. But as bad as 95/98/98se were, I can't imagine ME having any worse a reputation. NT 4.0 was perfect except for lack of DirectX support for gaming, so I was quite pleased when 2000 came along.

Everything caused a blue screen.

lmao so true.

even in the first 5 minutes of me booting up into millennium I got a BSOD.

btw to the OP poster; Vista is far superior to ME, you should use Vista on a current spec'd machine and then give your opinion :yes:

One thing that bugged me to totally annoyance were the BSOD's I got randomly (all NVIDIA related btw, no flame), while 98SE was as stable as a rock. Also when I did get a BSOD in ME, the screen would go blue for a flash and then my monitor would go to standby? :o Never touched it after that and went to Windows2000, that ran fine for several years :)

for me when i installed it i had it installed on a intel Pentium 233mhz MMX chip with 256megs of ram and while it was faster 4months to the day i installed it it started crashing and all sorts of messed up issue so i reinstalled it and it worked great for another 3 months but almost to the 4months mark again it started its crap. then in went back to windows 98se until XP came out and i upgraded . now for me Vista has never BSOD on me not at all even in the beta 2 stages so yea awsome for vista but spit canned for windows ME

  • 4 weeks later...

Windows M.E.? hmm Let's see

I had Windows 98 SE, then M.E. was released I was like YAY a new Windows!

So I prepared everything, backup the files, create a boot disk floppy, format and install a fresh copy of Windows M.E. So I look at WIndows M.E. loading up for the very first time and I was like "z0mg new Icons!". I doubleclicked MY COMPUTER, my very first action in M.E., and the computer BSOD'ed me.

I was like "um................ ok". At other times, I would get an error where it would popup a message

"Unknown has caused an error in unknown. Unknown must shut down". LiKE WTF! I've had this in 98 too, but they were there in M.E. too

2000 and XP were godlike in comparison to those 9X pos DOS based windows.

The computer would fail to turn off. It remained jammed on an empty dos screen. Numerous unexplainable error messages. The joys of CTRL-ALT-DELETE CTRL-ALT-DELETE. When I switched to Windows XP, needless to say, I was extremely impressed with how stable it ran in comparison. Now I run Vista and it's just rock solid! Microsoft made a lot a progress since 2000.

Indeed. Windows 2000 was my favorite OS until Vista came along. I never was a huge fan of XP.

Windows 2000 was my favorite OS until I got my new laptop in 2005 with Windows XP. I am not much of a Vista fan.

Windows M.E.? hmm Let's see

I had Windows 98 SE, then M.E. was released I was like YAY a new Windows!

So I prepared everything, backup the files, create a boot disk floppy, format and install a fresh copy of Windows M.E. So I look at WIndows M.E. loading up for the very first time and I was like "z0mg new Icons!". I doubleclicked MY COMPUTER, my very first action in M.E., and the computer BSOD'ed me.

I was like "um................ ok". At other times, I would get an error where it would popup a message

"Unknown has caused an error in unknown. Unknown must shut down". LiKE WTF! I've had this in 98 too, but they were there in M.E. too

2000 and XP were godlike in comparison to those 9X pos DOS based windows.

Come on! Windows 9x was extremely reliable, as reliable as trying to get my cat to clean the garage for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!