Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked

[Popcorned1]

Neowin posted a RegHack on the frontpage. ;) I assume his link would be fine.

[1Frothy]

Neowin posted a RegHack on the frontpage. ;) I assume his link would be fine.

That :blink: I found a bit unusual.

I guess there are more people annoyed by the delay of the Service Pack than I thought.

[lordtinuviel]

Vista Home Premium

try to install SP1 and I get this:

error code: 0x80070002

any ideas????

[Zirus]

http://sayuri.eu

is this RTM?

Is there a CRC of a known good copy we can check this against? Or has someone tested this download?

[turntablist1200]

Is there a CRC of a known good copy we can check this against? Or has someone tested this download?

I have this downloaded to and would like to know if it will void my licence?

[theshadowhunter]

Is there a CRC of a known good copy we can check this against? Or has someone tested this download?

i just tested it:

6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

6001.18000.x86fre.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

Service Pack 1

[Max Veteran]

i just tested it:

6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

6001.18000.x86fre.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

Service Pack 1

I think he meant that he was after the MD5 checksum or something.

[Budious]

Is there a CRC of a known good copy we can check this against? Or has someone tested this download?

x86 file version from that site:

md5 = d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

File version on extractor says: 6.0.6001.17028

I'm guessing it's RC Refresh build.

[M118LR]

Vista Home Premium

try to install SP1 and I get this:

error code: 0x80070002

any ideas????

File a Bug Report

Oh that's right, you can't

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

[1Frothy]

File a Bug Report

Oh that's right, you can't

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Wow, you're totally useless and so is your post. :crazy:

Anyway, Daeron Tin?viel>, perhaps this Microsoft KB Article can help you:

You receive a "0x80070002" or "0x80070003" error code after you download an update from Windows Update, from Microsoft Update, or from Windows Server Update Services.[/b]>

[Phemo]

x86 file version from that site:

md5 = d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

File version on extractor says: 6.0.6001.17028

I'm guessing it's RC Refresh build.

Even build 18000 says 17028 if you check the properties on the installer itself so it likely is RTM.

[M118LR]

Wow, you're totally useless and so is your post. :crazy:

Why thank you so very much. Now I can have a nice day.

They are on there own, so why would you offer to help?

[1Frothy]

Why thank you so very much. Now I can have a nice day.

They are on there own, so why would you offer to help?

Because, we are a community. Here to not only give each other virtual wedgies but to maybe help with a suggestion; not just laughing at someones misfortune or problem.

[The Rev]

All this "what to do?" over an operating system "everyone hates....." whod'a thunk it :p

[venejo]

OK, here's a question.

I have downloaded and installed the X86 SP1 instaler (everything ok).

The filename is: Windows6.0-KB936330-X86.exe

The filesize is: 455.562.200 bytes

The MD5 cheksum is: d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2 (as mentioned before in a previous post)

The build mentioned in registry is: 6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840

And finally the file's Digital Signature is 19 of January 2008.

Now, I have also downloaded two X64 SP1 installers (haven't tried them yet).

The first one is 761.740.600 bytes and signed on 19 of Jan also.

The second is 914.983.528 bytes and signed on 20 of Jan.

Both have the same filename: Windows6.0-KB936330-X64.exe

Could be the second that is the multilanquge pack? (because it's bigger), or it's the corrected version and not

the one that OEMs got? (still it's big though).

UPDATE: on Bink's site it says that "Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 = The RTM build" and that the one you can download

with the registry hack is SP1. :woot:

Edited February 8, 2008 by venejo

[ZombieFly]

What's that supposed to mean?

Sorry if my post doesn't cut the mustard with you.

I was just trying to get an opinion on the validity of the article.

FYI: new = not noob necessarily

If that is all you have to say maybe you can post me a link to get a refund on my subscription?

Thank you to anybody else who would have an opinion.

ALERT: stand back, sense of humour failure detected :shiftyninja:

[Setnom]

Just a quick doubt: Does SP1 already contain these hotfixes highlighted in NVIDIA's website?

http://www.nvidia.com/object/windows_vista_hotfixes.html

[Elliot B.]

I've heard SP1 can't be slipstreamed and only SP2 will be.

What is the cleanest way to install Vista with SP2, then? Surely not installing Vista then installing SP2 on top of it? :s

[+Audioboxer Subscriber²]

I've heard SP1 can't be slipstreamed and only SP2 will be.

What is the cleanest way to install Vista with SP2, then? Surely not installing Vista then installing SP2 on top of it? :s

You can download a slipstreamed SP1 ISO.

Microsoft themselves must of done it?

I'm sure they will issue out SP1 discs as well at somepoint?

Of course as an end user it's also possible to go through a reverse integration process - http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?catid=1&id=9536

However that is tricky/messy and I'd suggest just downloading the SP1 integrated ISO off the net.

I myself as I said earlier would only of installed SP1 if I could integrate it into the installation - For 2 reasons, 1 so I can use Vlite and the other as I don't like installing RTM and THEN SP1 on top... just doesn't feel "effecient" to me.

[Elliot B.]

You can download a slipstreamed SP1 iso.

As in Microsoft themselves must of done it.

I'm sure they will issue out SP1 discs as well at somepoint?

Of course as an end user it's also possible to go through a reverse integration process - http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?catid=1&id=9536

However that is tricky/messy and I'd suggest just downloading the SP1 integrated ISO off the net.

I'll do that when it's available (Y)

[+Audioboxer Subscriber²]

I'll do that when it's available (Y)

It's available right now :p (im running it)

But I get your drift, once MS themselves offer it as a download. Fair enough (Y)

[NateB1]

I also read that slipstreaming *might* be possible via the updated AIK. I will be trying this out when I get home. I've been able to find a x86 integrated iso on the 'Net, but not a x64 integrated iso, which is mainly what I'm looking for.

[franzon]

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes which works at zdnet.com gave us the MD5 hashes of SP1:

Here:

32-bit (434MB): d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

64-bit (726MB): 983308426e8ee7649f53b41f4e5c42d4

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.htm...195&start=0

[Swift33]

I also read that slipstreaming *might* be possible via the updated AIK. I will be trying this out when I get home. I've been able to find a x86 integrated iso on the 'Net, but not a x64 integrated iso, which is mainly what I'm looking for.

Slipstreaming SP1 is not possible in any way, shape or form even with an updated AIK. vLite.net has more info in their second post on an alternative method to "slip" it.

[NateB1]

Slipstreaming SP1 is not possible in any way, shape or form even with an updated AIK. vLite.net has more info in their second post on an alternative method to "slip" it.

Yeah, I did some more research. Evidently, you can use the updated AIK in the reverse integration method, but not slipstream.