Forthcoming changes on Bans & Moderations


Recommended Posts

I think this is an great idea, and quite well thought out. Hopefully, it will inspire others to behave and stop the constant asking in threads which I have noticed recently of "why has member x been banned?".

I love the way Neowin is continuing to try and improve all the time. Keep it up (Y)

Lol I have 100% though... man, and it was only because of signature violations and calling some guy an idiot and flame-baiting. So I mean, it wasn't anything too bad. Hopefully people won't change their perspective on me (or other such members) through this display of warnings.

I like your sig by the way :p

Changes I would like to see to the rating system to prevent abuse:

1. You cannot rate your own thread.

2. A thread rating is not visible until at least 2 people rate it. (A single member's rating cannot be representative of the average opinion.)

Those are both cool ideas. I think, though, I'd like to see the rating not visible until at least 3 or even 5 people rate it. It seems to me a lot of thread rates with 2 people are one giving it a 1 and the other giving it a 5. Another idea that might make those rating more useful more quickly is to show the actual number of raters who have rated the thread right next to the number of stars. I know you can see this if you click on the down arrow once you've opened the thread but if the actual number of raters could show up along with the stars in the active posts listings, then people would know more without having to open the thread.

Those are both cool ideas. I think, though, I'd like to see the rating not visible until at least 3 or even 5 people rate it.

The problem with this is thread ratings are quite rare as they are, and almost no threads except the extremely popular ones have 3 or 5+ ratings. But who knows, perhaps rating threads will become a more popular habit amongst members as they discover this feature.

Sounds like a great improvement. Hopefully the additional information that will be shown about bans will help to avoid situations like the 'snypergate' scandal.

also, showing 40%< bans publicly should persuade those with such warning to keep their nose clean.

will the reduction period remain at 6 months?

/note to self, trademark the words 'snypergate'

i still don't know what happened to snyper, more openness (does that word exist? :p) is a welcome and necessary change. Glad that neowin decides to follow some of the rules of a democracy :D

These changes should be interesting. I haven't been here long enough to notice any sort of changes in the atmosphere that people on occasion claim has happened, but I'm sure these changes to allow us to see more of the moderation process come as a result of all the "lets moderate the mods" suggestions from This thread.

I'm certainly pleased to see that the higher-ups here are this considerate towards the membership's wishes and to be honest, this has kind of pushed my hand to part with $15 and subscribe. (Y) (Y)

-----------------

And now for a completely unrelated discussion :rolleyes::

Dude, you're the only person I know who cares about thread ratings.

Incorrect as well, if I really was, others wouldn't have spoken up about the issue of topic rating in the GH either. They have many times.

Maybe he should have said that you are the only one who derails threads about other unrelated things into discussions about thread ratings.

I opened this thread this morning, hoping to read a thread about "forthcoming changes on bans & moderations" only to find half of the 200 posts are about thread ratings.

I mean honestly, I've never rated any thread with one star just because of the thread starter and certainly don't have any kind of vendetta against you, but I can certainly see by your behavior in this thread how someone might have a beef with you.

It's funny as hell that even a thread specifically about moderation gets completely off topic.

It's Neowin we can chat about one subject and it will always go in a different direction!

These changes should be interesting. I haven't been here long enough to notice any sort of changes in the atmosphere that people on occasion claim has happened, but I'm sure these changes to allow us to see more of the moderation process come as a result of all the "lets moderate the mods" suggestions from This thread.

I'm certainly pleased to see that the higher-ups here are this considerate towards the membership's wishes and to be honest, this has kind of pushed my hand to part with $15 and subscribe. (Y) (Y)

-----------------

And now for a completely unrelated discussion :rolleyes::

Incorrect as well, if I really was, others wouldn't have spoken up about the issue of topic rating in the GH either. They have many times.

Maybe he should have said that you are the only one who derails threads about other unrelated things into discussions about thread ratings.

I opened this thread this morning, hoping to read a thread about "forthcoming changes on bans & moderations" only to find half of the 200 posts are about thread ratings.

I mean honestly, I've never rated any thread with one star just because of the thread starter and certainly don't have any kind of vendetta against you, but I can certainly see by your behavior in this thread how someone might have a beef with you.

....

My issue relates to moderation and the warning system and in a topic where the moderators are talking about change I merely raised my point.

It's clearly something that people want to have a say on as half of the "200" posts you talk about, being "100", "half" of them aren't even posted by me.

They (admins/mods) seem to have had no problem with the point on ratings being raised, and from it we've had what I can see as a good number of suggestions from the community on how to tackle the rating system.

I'm not the only one to make the moderators aware of the system being abused in this topic.

How is that worthless and "derailing"?

I'm 100% sure as the leaders of a community they would rather hear respectful issues raised by members even at the sake of a topic going slightly offtopic, than let us all continue to surf on Neowin and try to take things into our own hands.

I can certainly see by your behavior in this thread how someone might have a beef with you.

I'd be saddened to see someone upset/have a beef with me over my input in this thread....

:hmmm:

It's Neowin we can chat about one subject and it will always go in a different direction!

It's the only place where a discussion on using the term "mum and dad" in schools can turn into a debate about God's morality.

I love this place! :D

it will be interesting to see what people think after the changes are made and they re-read this thread. I've just read it from start-to-finish and I must say I've taken notice (first time in a long time) of the warn % while reading.

I find it most enlightening it reallyh helps with the convo. I'm not sayingg that all 60+ warn - members posts were iqnored but i did give more time to the posters who had 0% and they are able to do that without feeling the need to make a big deal out of it.

p.s. yes the 1star issue is not right, we cant condone what seems to be tantermount to bulling tacktics. Neowin has never condoned this sort of behaviour.

besides this is less than i suggested, I would have been much harder but im to clinical. Steve feels for the whole community - good & bad. He's the best mate any member could have on here. He will defend youthe membershipto the hilt, even when frankly some members havn't deserved it.

now im not saying everything Steve does is wonderful, he is afterall only a regular bloke. But after 7 years of working here I can say he is damn good at what he does.

I do agree we sometimes have the odd problem moderator and they are usually just as much of a problem for us as you. Its in our interests that the community runs as smooth as possible, that way we do less work ;) So they usually arnt around very long. And I can say atm we dont have any problem mods that I can persoanlly say I've seen or had to deal with.

Myself & Steve spent along time personally coming up & writing the Mods Charter & Guideline's & structures which every mod has to sign upto. We constantly monitor the rules and the mods to make sure everything runs smooth. Im not sure I know any other forum that has such a ridged sytem ccovers both mods and memners.

Dan

Those are both cool ideas. I think, though, I'd like to see the rating not visible until at least 3 or even 5 people rate it.

IIRC, it used to be set to only show until 5 people had rated it, but hardly anyone ever rated a thread, once it was reduced to 1 vote, a lot more of the threads started to recieve ratings.

IIRC, it used to be set to only show until 5 people had rated it, but hardly anyone ever rated a thread, once it was reduced to 1 vote, a lot more of the threads started to recieve ratings.

Can it be set independently for each forum on the board?

For example in media/movie ratings 1 vote triggers it to appear, but in the GH 3-5 votes are required for a rating to appear?

Yeah that won't catch the culprits who troll and 1-star vote, but it at least visually makes the forum look tidier/better for those posting - As I suspect in the majority of cases it's a small minority, if not even 1 or 2 people who are 1-star voting everything.

Edited by Audioboxer
Can it be set independently for each forum on the board?

For example in media/movie ratings 1 vote triggers it to appear, but in the GH 3-5 votes are required for a rating to appear?

Yeah that won't catch the culprits who troll and 1-star vote, but it at least visually makes the forum look tidier/better for those posting.

possibly, but im not sure, dont have access to that stuff :p

We aren't worried about those members on 80% or 100% getting a freebie because generally those members will always screw up.

I used to be on 80%, I'm now on 0%. I don't think that it's fair to assume that members that do a few too many minor stuffups are always going to screw up.

I think that this whole public shaming business is not the right way to go about maintaining rules. I don't see a problem with the current system to be honest where if you break a rule, you get a warning until you are banned. Why do I care what happens to someone else? All that we're going to get are members that are displaying their warning proudly, they might even go as far as make one of those signatures where instead of says "Username -Moderator" or "Username -Subscriber", it will say "Username -100% warning"

I used to be on 80%, I'm now on 0%. I don't think that it's fair to assume that members that do a few too many minor stuffups are always going to screw up.

I think that this whole public shaming business is not the right way to go about maintaining rules. I don't see a problem with the current system to be honest where if you break a rule, you get a warning until you are banned.

exactly my thoughts. to be honest it happened to me aswell :cool:

Just my opinion, but maybe 20% should get their warning badge displayed as well.

Sorry if I'm just reiterating, but I can't read through 14 pages.

Why? whats your reason for that?...I think it would be wrong because it might be people who have just made one mistake, I know because I have 20% warn but that being on display wouldnt make me angry but it just seems wrong to display people who may of made just one mistake.

I used to be on 80%, I'm now on 0%. I don't think that it's fair to assume that members that do a few too many minor stuffups are always going to screw up.

I think that this whole public shaming business is not the right way to go about maintaining rules.

True, random "Zomg my warn be showin" threads will pop up like hot cakes.

Why? whats your reason for that?...I think it would be wrong because it might be people who have just made one mistake, I know because I have 20% warn but that being on display wouldnt make me angry but it just seems wrong to display people who may of made just one mistake.

Well, I think if you are going to do this whole "embarrassment" thing, everyone should be included. I mean, that way, 20% will even seem like a bad thing (not calling you bad :p) and people will be discouraged from posting before they think or whatever they did to get that.

Come now Rich, the man apologised and the "issue" has been slightly flogged already, me being one of them! He is still practicing self-flagellation using an instrument called a "discipline", a cattail whip made of light chains with small spikes or hooks on the end! :laugh:

I guess the worst thing about the ratings system is that we can't see who rated what, so we can't see which member is constantly voting Audioboxers threads 1 star. Maybe it's possible at db level, I'll ask Davelegg.

It should be. When I go to re-rate a thread, or rate it for the first time, it knows what I last rated it at, and it allows me to update my vote. There must be some record (even in txt format) that shows the username or number, thread number, and rating they gave. I fear it could all be encrypted. But something so small shouldn't

Myself & Steve spent along time personally coming up & writing the Mods Charter & Guideline's & structures which every mod has to sign upto. We constantly monitor the rules and the mods to make sure everything runs smooth. Im not sure I know any other forum that has such a ridged sytem ccovers both mods and memners.

Dan

Your the only forum that I know of that has created guidelines for it's mods, rather then the quick chat over Messenger saying "just mod the place", where people abuse the power, and attempt to be power hungry infront of other members. A charter & guidelines helps inforce these rules about being a mod, so the community doesn't turn into chaos. I will be the first to say, thank you for doing so.

Edited by lylesback2
It should be. When I go to re-rate a thread, or rate it for the first time, it knows what I last rated it at, and it allows me to update my vote. There must be some record (even in txt format) that shows the username or number, thread number, and rating they gave. I fear it could all be encrypted. But something so small shouldn't

Your the only forum that I know of that has created guidelines for it's mods, rather then the quick chat over Messenger saying "just mod the place", where people abuse the power, and attempt to be power hungry infront of other members. A charter & guidelines helps inforce these rules about being a mod, so the community doesn't turn into chaos. I will be the first to say, thank you for doing so.

That is a decent point, the system does know what you voted a thread and remembers.

I thought maybe it's done by a cookie on your end, but I don't think so... it must be stored somewhere, but as you said I doubt it's a huge txt file well layed out and formatted and easy to read :p

Still it would be nice to hear from those who do run the coding side of Neowin to see what they have to say.

Hold on, so you get to be rude to people and call them idiots, but members cant? Thats not very fair now is it?

You can be rude to people all you want so long as they are not members. If you look closely Neobond was not speaking to a member (at least not an active one).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!