Recommended Posts

I won't lie I bought it that Taker was back but that was well played by Bray

 

I liked the Sting segment as well I just have a feeling that match is going to be poor :/

I thought so too, but if felt weird from the beginning, Taker's theme usually interrupts something, a match, an interview, etc., but this time was just after that short break. Also, Cole's reaction was not the usual "Taker is back!" reaction. Anyway, this could be a good match, but what about Lesnar? They have to wrap that up somehow, Taker doesn't usually leave loose ends untied.

 

About Sting, I didn't like it that much, I really wanted to hear some words from him. It seems they're copying the "Crow Sting" angle from WCW, you know, with the silence thing. But I think it will be a good match, he still got it and HHH looks good too. The outcome? I think HHH will win this one, as everyone is expecting Sting to win. And I hate it. Would be a cool thing to have WCW kick WWE's ass one more time. :p

 

Oh, and it was about time to see the bat again. :D

I won't lie I bought it that Taker was back but that was well played by Bray

 

I liked the Sting segment as well I just have a feeling that match is going to be poor :/

 

I thought so too, but if felt weird from the beginning, Taker's theme usually interrupts something, a match, an interview, etc., but this time was just after that short break. Also, Cole's reaction was not the usual "Taker is back!" reaction. Anyway, this could be a good match, but what about Lesnar? They have to wrap that up somehow, Taker doesn't usually leave loose ends untied.

 

About Sting, I didn't like it that much, I really wanted to hear some words from him. It seems they're copying the "Crow Sting" angle from WCW, you know, with the silence thing. But I think it will be a good match, he still got it and HHH looks good too. The outcome? I think HHH will win this one, as everyone is expecting Sting to win. And I hate it. Would be a cool thing to have WCW kick WWE's ass one more time. :p

 

Oh, and it was about time to see the bat again. :D

 

 

I knew it was Bray the second JBL said 'Its him!' which was pretty much as soon as the druids started coming out.

I thought so too, but if felt weird from the beginning, Taker's theme usually interrupts something, a match, an interview, etc., but this time was just after that short break. Also, Cole's reaction was not the usual "Taker is back!" reaction. Anyway, this could be a good match, but what about Lesnar? They have to wrap that up somehow, Taker doesn't usually leave loose ends untied.

 

About Sting, I didn't like it that much, I really wanted to hear some words from him. It seems they're copying the "Crow Sting" angle from WCW, you know, with the silence thing. But I think it will be a good match, he still got it and HHH looks good too. The outcome? I think HHH will win this one, as everyone is expecting Sting to win. And I hate it. Would be a cool thing to have WCW kick WWE's ass one more time. :p

 

Oh, and it was about time to see the bat again. :D

 

LOL, Trips isn't winning at WM. 

LOL, Trips isn't winning at WM. 

 

Go on...

 

I  am curious about this one.  I doubt Vince will let the WWE look bad against WCW (seeing as that is how this is being pitched) but then why would Sting even consider going out on a loss against the (in my opinion) mediocre HHH?

Go on...

 

I  am curious about this one.  I doubt Vince will let the WWE look bad against WCW (seeing as that is how this is being pitched) but then why would Sting even consider going out on a loss against the (in my opinion) mediocre HHH?

 

Sting's didn't finally sign with WWE to lose his match. 

Thats not to say this will be the only one, but he's not losing this one. 

 

There might be some giant screwball craziness going on to cover for HHH, but Sting is going to win.

 

WCW is long dead and buried. I doubt Vince cares much about looking 'bad' against it. They do write the narrative so that it always makes WWE look good, but one match won't change that.

Sting's didn't finally sign with WWE to lose his match. 

Thats not to say this will be the only one, but he's not losing this one. 

 

There might be some giant screwball craziness going on to cover for HHH, but Sting is going to win.

 

WCW is long dead and buried. I doubt Vince cares much about looking 'bad' against it. They do write the narrative so that it always makes WWE look good, but one match won't change that.

Yes, but people's opinions and memories on WWE vs. WCW are still very much alive, and Sting IS the face of WCW, the one guy WWE couldn't "break". I'm not worried about Vince, I'm worried about HHH's ego. He might just be stupid enough to want the win.

If they make Brock Loose the match the it will be an EPIC fail for WWE.

 

 

Fastlane was not better than the last two PPV.

The qualty is seriously taking a DIP.

 

Brock will lose at WM but Reigns will lose soon after due to a cash in :yes:

What I would like to know is, why are the matches on NXT so much better than on RAW or Smackdown? I am watching NXT Takeover Rivals on the WWE Network, and it floors me how much better the matches are. The fatal fourway for the Women's Championship was longer than the past months worth of Divas matches on RAW and Smackdown combined, and ten times better.

  • Like 3

Brock will lose at WM but Reigns will lose soon after due to a cash in :yes:

 

 

Or Brock beats the hell out of reigns & Authority help cash in.

 

After that Brock goes Beast/God mode & keeps beating evryone on Raw until he win the title back @ the next PPV.

 

But the WWE creative team lacks motivation?

See what they are doing with STING!

What I would like to know is, why are the matches on NXT so much better than on RAW or Smackdown? I am watching NXT Takeover Rivals on the WWE Network, and it floors me how much better the matches are. The fatal fourway for the Women's Championship was longer than the past months worth of Divas matches on RAW and Smackdown combined, and ten times better.

They're actually given time to have a proper match instead of some ###### 2-3 minutes. also, NXT isn't filled with overdrawn in-ring promos and backstage crap, like the "board meeting" tonight. I'm actually sure that if given the time, the divas from Raw and Smackdown could put on some great matches.

 

Raw and Smackdown are only there to sell merch, push the WWE Network, and hype up whatever the next pay-per-view happens to be at the time, each show is a just long commercial with a few wrestling matches tossed in.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!