Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, philixus1988 said:

So they pulled the trigger on randy vs bray. Does it mean that its now going to be aj vs randy vs bray? It will be an awesome wrestling match but it doesnt really fit well as a storyline.

 

randy betraying bray wyat before wrestle mania...SO unpredictable *sarcasm*

 

I think they might make it a fatal 4 way somehow by adding harper. but you are right aj vs bray vs randy doesn't fit with storyline. Maybe aj and randy will have a match before wrestlemania to determine who will face bray 

 

Two more big names gone from TNA...

Quote

Mike Bennett and Maria Kanellis-Bennett have departed TNA, PWInsider.com has confirmed with multiple sources.

 

Their respective contracts expired in late 2016 and they had been working on per appearance deals over the last set of TNA TV tapings.  TNA management had attempted to sign the pair to new contracts and according to one source, had agreed to terms with the company only to later inform TNA they would not be signing.  So, the pair are already done and will not be working this week's TV tapings. 

 

2 hours ago, wendy oltman said:

randy betraying bray wyat before wrestle mania...SO unpredictable *sarcasm*

 

I think they might make it a fatal 4 way somehow by adding harper. but you are right aj vs bray vs randy doesn't fit with storyline. Maybe aj and randy will have a match before wrestlemania to determine who will face bray

Yeah, I would have wanted randy to betray wyatt DURING the main event match itself, but let's see where this is heading.

Frankly, I like Luke vs AJ match, Luke has a helluva lot of potential. I would love to see a luke vs aj on wrestlemania card but that would be an injustice to AJ.

Another one gone from TNA...

Quote

Former TNA Knockouts champion Jade's deal with TNA has expired and she is now officially a free agent, PWInsider.com has confirmed.  There is no word whether she will be working this week's Impact Wrestling tapings as the company has been working to have all the regulars appearing on the tapings signed to deals.

 

Jade, real name Stephanie Bell, 27, has been with the company full-time since 2015, initially debuted as a member of the Dollhouse with Taryn Terrell and Marti Belle.  Once that group ran its course, Jade has been pushed as one of the focal points of the Knockouts division and has currently been feuding with Rosemary for the championship.  She received a lot of mainstream media attention last year for speaking out against domestic abuse she has endured in the past.

 

One gone from WWE now.

Quote

Former World Heavyweight champ Jack Swagger has requested his release from WWE … and he’s already done an interview to get the word out.


Swagger appeared on Chael Sonnen‘s podcast and said, “As of yesterday, I asked for my release from WWE.” Adding, “It’s still kind of an ongoing process right now. Basically, it came down to contract negotiations. We were way off. They didn’t value me at what I thought I was valued at.”

 

“They weren’t giving me the opportunity to make the full amount of income I could for my family, so when you put it like that … it’s time to go.”

 

Jack was initially drafted to Raw after the brand split, but made the switch to SmackDown Live shortly after and wrestled against Baron Corbin at No Mercy in a losing effort.

 

He hasn’t been used much on TV since.

 

Unclear what his plans for the future are … but with Jack’s former manager Zeb Colter aka Dutch Mantell working in creative at Impact Wrestling now and company sources saying they’re looking to freshen up the roster — a reunion between the two sounds possible.

 

Finally some good news for TNA this week: they're coming back to British TV - on Spike, which could actually be a step up from Challenge, since it's run by Channel 5 (never thought I'd ever say that about Channel 5) - and they've ditched that new weird logo for a much better one!

Guess Channel 5 are really trying to get back into wrestling now; they used to show WCW over here, now we've had that live 5* Wrestling-run Dominant Wrestling show back in January, there's also the massive 128-man tournament coming this summer, and now TNA on top of that. Good times! The more wrestling we get on free TV, the better.

Oh god, I just hope someone announces who is getting Jeff and Matt already lol This garbage on Twitter suckssssssss. I truly hate that kind of kayfabe crap in this day and age, not to mention its just rumorville all over the place right now. Some sites are reporting that WWE is definitely getting Jeff and NJPW will get Matt more than likely, and one I even saw say the exact opposite lol whatttt?

23 minutes ago, LOC said:

Oh god, I just hope someone announces who is getting Jeff and Matt already lol This garbage on Twitter suckssssssss. I truly hate that kind of kayfabe crap in this day and age, not to mention its just rumorville all over the place right now. Some sites are reporting that WWE is definitely getting Jeff and NJPW will get Matt more than likely, and one I even saw say the exact opposite lol whatttt?

I'm guessing it'll be WWE; they've been mentioning him more often online. Hell, they tweeted this earlier today (and tagged Matt Hardy in it)...

 

The Hardys will be pretty close to Orlando on WrestleMania weekend, too, challenging The Bucks of Youth for the ROH tag team titles at Supercard of Honor XI. No way would they bring them back at WrestleMania, though; if WWE do re-sign them, I bet they'll return on the Raw or Smackdown after WrestleMania. As for now...

 

Well, the rumor is Angle will show up after WM on RAW, I doubt they'd bring the Hardy's back the same night. Either at WM or bust on that one, unless they put them on SD I suppose. But I don't think they would put them on SD at this point. Especially if Jeff is the only who comes back in at that point. He'd supposedly get a monster face push, so that'd be on RAW I'm sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!