Recommended Posts

But unless you pay a subscription fee you are capped, cant use download managers, can only download a set amount before you have to wait.

The whole point of torrents is sharing not just being greedy and downloading what you want without uploading anything in return.

thats not entirely correct. u can generate rapidshare premium points (or collectors points or how they are called now lol) and if you have ennough you can buy a free account. u generate those points by UPLOADING stuff and offer it others for download.

so its not that much different from torrents, except it runs full speed from the beginning and leaves the user the choice: to down- or to upload. i like being able to make choices on my own. dont u? :D

Comments from Mininova.org lol dunno its true or not...

Windows 7 7048 is a pre-rc1 (pre-version of rc1).

I have leaked Windows 7 build 7054 x86 32 bits RC1 that will be released in end of march or april, build of 2 march 2009 (compiled).

Sorry the comment is too long, but you can get download link and instruction in the text file uploaded at:

<>

Sorry for my english!

Please take screenshot:) !

Be happy

soldatbigviv

Fake, 7054 probably hasn't been compiled yet and there has been no information about a new Aero design with ribbon effects unless you are talking about paint or wordpad. Microsoft wouldn't put that in an operating system so late in it's development as it'll need a lot of feed back and testing. RC means feature complete but working on bugs etc.

Edited by shockz
Fake, 7054 probably hasn't been compiled yet and there has been no information about a new Aero design with ribbon effects unless you are talking about paint or wordpad. Microsoft wouldn't put that in an operating system so late in it's development as it'll need a lot of feed back and testing. RC means feature complete but working on bugs etc.

Same here. At best, MS is working on or has 7049 internally moving around based on what Neowin confirmed over the weekend.

Comments from Mininova.org lol dunno its true or not...

Windows 7 7048 is a pre-rc1 (pre-version of rc1).

I have leaked Windows 7 build 7054 x86 32 bits RC1 that will be released in end of march or april, build of 2 march 2009 (compiled).

Sorry the comment is too long, but you can get download link and instruction in the text file uploaded at:

[url="http://www.2shared.com/file/4994019/1a1d363f/7-<>

Sorry for my english!

Please take screenshot:) !

Be happy

soldatbigviv

Lol...so fake! There is no such thing as a build 7054.

Edited by shockz

^^^LOL and there you have it. That is how noobs get pwned.

head down to <>and see the comments =p

I'm still not willing to trust it until I at least get some sceenshots. Even then, nothing is real until it gets leaked and confirmed. Why not put it up for download so everyone can stop wasting time on 7048.

Edited by shockz
The proof (proove) of i've leaked Windows 7 Build 7054 RC x86 32bits

setup.exe file uploaded:

click on the fellowin' link:

<>

When you modify the strings in a hex file you invalidate the digital signature. You should be banned for even posting this.

The digital signature is Jan16 aka the 7022 x86 build. You simply modified the strings that said 7022 and changed that to 7054 which has now invalidated the digital signature.

We're not stupid.

Edit: And to prove my point somebody else beat me to checking the digital signature.

You can kiss that 7+ year old membership goodbye.

Edited by shockz

Dude, please read my previous posts. I didnt even modify its someone from mininova claims it.. fake or truth i dont know.

When you modify the strings in a hex file you invalidate the digital signature. You should be banned for even posting this.

The digital signature is Jan16 aka the 7022 x86 build. You simply modified the strings that said 7022 and changed that to 7054 which has now invalidated the digital signature.

We're not stupid.

Edit: And to prove my point somebody else beat me to checking the digital signature.

OMG i can't believe as dumb as you no offence.. read my previous posts.............. and head down to<>

OMG i can't believe people as dumb as you no offence.. read my previous posts..............<>] and check the comments..

Yeah I see that now, but when you don't put quotes around what you're saying when you copy paste it really sounds like you're the one saying that. That's what the "Quote" option is for.

Plus, your English is poor so I'll give the benefit of the doubt.

Edited by shockz
Dude, please read my previous posts. I didnt even modify its someone from mininova claims it.. fake or truth i dont know.

Well I can see that you probably did not leak it since I am following the same mininova thread too. But next time at least use quotes and write a little description warning us what it is. This is a forum and this thread will likely get hammered in the coming days, so it is not wise to post untrustworthy links like that regardless of intentions.

Okay. I've just downloaded random .dll files from the torrent and they all have the 7048 build. If this is indeed a fake then it's a very convincing one since someone took the time to go out and modify most of the dll's.

Also, when I said before about just removing the build 7000/7022 .wim images from the iso's and replacing them with the new ones, I might advise against it as the .dll files have been updated (i.e. the new build numbers).

post-95774-1236100225_thumb.png

Also, when I said before about just removing the build 7000/7022 .wim images from the iso's and replacing them with the new ones, I might advise against it as the .dll files have been updated (i.e. the new build numbers).

Should not matter as the setup is really just a PE enviroment, if 7000 installed fine there should be no problem using the older version of it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!