Windows 7 Build 7032/Build 7048 64bit leaked?

By Warboy
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

simonlang

Posted
Posted
But unless you pay a subscription fee you are capped, cant use download managers, can only download a set amount before you have to wait.

The whole point of torrents is sharing not just being greedy and downloading what you want without uploading anything in return.

thats not entirely correct. u can generate rapidshare premium points (or collectors points or how they are called now lol) and if you have ennough you can buy a free account. u generate those points by UPLOADING stuff and offer it others for download.

so its not that much different from torrents, except it runs full speed from the beginning and leaves the user the choice: to down- or to upload. i like being able to make choices on my own. dont u? :D

Grand Master

ToneKnee

Posted
Posted (edited)
Comments from Mininova.org lol dunno its true or not...

Windows 7 7048 is a pre-rc1 (pre-version of rc1).

I have leaked Windows 7 build 7054 x86 32 bits RC1 that will be released in end of march or april, build of 2 march 2009 (compiled).

Sorry the comment is too long, but you can get download link and instruction in the text file uploaded at:

<>

Sorry for my english!

Please take screenshot:) !

Be happy

soldatbigviv

Fake, 7054 probably hasn't been compiled yet and there has been no information about a new Aero design with ribbon effects unless you are talking about paint or wordpad. Microsoft wouldn't put that in an operating system so late in it's development as it'll need a lot of feed back and testing. RC means feature complete but working on bugs etc.

Edited by shockz
Experienced

Inctye

Posted
Posted
Fake, 7054 probably hasn't been compiled yet and there has been no information about a new Aero design with ribbon effects unless you are talking about paint or wordpad. Microsoft wouldn't put that in an operating system so late in it's development as it'll need a lot of feed back and testing. RC means feature complete but working on bugs etc.

Same here. At best, MS is working on or has 7049 internally moving around based on what Neowin confirmed over the weekend.

Mentor

RageOfFury

Posted
Posted (edited)
Comments from Mininova.org lol dunno its true or not...

Windows 7 7048 is a pre-rc1 (pre-version of rc1).

I have leaked Windows 7 build 7054 x86 32 bits RC1 that will be released in end of march or april, build of 2 march 2009 (compiled).

Sorry the comment is too long, but you can get download link and instruction in the text file uploaded at:

[url="http://www.2shared.com/file/4994019/1a1d363f/7-<>

Sorry for my english!

Please take screenshot:) !

Be happy

soldatbigviv

Lol...so fake! There is no such thing as a build 7054.

Edited by shockz
Experienced

Inctye

Posted
Posted (edited)

^^^LOL and there you have it. That is how noobs get pwned.

head down to <>and see the comments =p

I'm still not willing to trust it until I at least get some sceenshots. Even then, nothing is real until it gets leaked and confirmed. Why not put it up for download so everyone can stop wasting time on 7048.

Edited by shockz
Explorer

ShortFuse

Posted
Posted (edited)
The proof (proove) of i've leaked Windows 7 Build 7054 RC x86 32bits

setup.exe file uploaded:

click on the fellowin' link:

<>

When you modify the strings in a hex file you invalidate the digital signature. You should be banned for even posting this.

The digital signature is Jan16 aka the 7022 x86 build. You simply modified the strings that said 7022 and changed that to 7054 which has now invalidated the digital signature.

We're not stupid.

Edit: And to prove my point somebody else beat me to checking the digital signature.

You can kiss that 7+ year old membership goodbye.

Edited by shockz
Enthusiast

koinonia

Posted
Posted

Dude, please read my previous posts. I didnt even modify its someone from mininova claims it.. fake or truth i dont know.

When you modify the strings in a hex file you invalidate the digital signature. You should be banned for even posting this.

The digital signature is Jan16 aka the 7022 x86 build. You simply modified the strings that said 7022 and changed that to 7054 which has now invalidated the digital signature.

We're not stupid.

Edit: And to prove my point somebody else beat me to checking the digital signature.

Explorer

ShortFuse

Posted
Posted (edited)
OMG i can't believe as dumb as you no offence.. read my previous posts.............. and head down to<>

OMG i can't believe people as dumb as you no offence.. read my previous posts..............<>] and check the comments..

Yeah I see that now, but when you don't put quotes around what you're saying when you copy paste it really sounds like you're the one saying that. That's what the "Quote" option is for.

Plus, your English is poor so I'll give the benefit of the doubt.

Edited by shockz
Experienced

Inctye

Posted
Posted
Dude, please read my previous posts. I didnt even modify its someone from mininova claims it.. fake or truth i dont know.

Well I can see that you probably did not leak it since I am following the same mininova thread too. But next time at least use quotes and write a little description warning us what it is. This is a forum and this thread will likely get hammered in the coming days, so it is not wise to post untrustworthy links like that regardless of intentions.

Grand Master

ToneKnee

Posted
Posted

Okay. I've just downloaded random .dll files from the torrent and they all have the 7048 build. If this is indeed a fake then it's a very convincing one since someone took the time to go out and modify most of the dll's.

Also, when I said before about just removing the build 7000/7022 .wim images from the iso's and replacing them with the new ones, I might advise against it as the .dll files have been updated (i.e. the new build numbers).

post-95774-1236100225_thumb.png

Proficient

McDave

Posted
Posted
Also, when I said before about just removing the build 7000/7022 .wim images from the iso's and replacing them with the new ones, I might advise against it as the .dll files have been updated (i.e. the new build numbers).

Should not matter as the setup is really just a PE enviroment, if 7000 installed fine there should be no problem using the older version of it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs

      By WaltC · Posted

      I've owned nothing but ATi/AMD GPUs since 2002, after my last nVidia GPU in 2001 (3dfx before that), IIRC, and in all of that time I recall getting this error maybe once, certainly no more than twice. Despite all the scuttlebutt as to how poor AMD drivers are supposed to be that has certainly not been my experience at all... Usually it has been a configuration problem of some kind. Then again, since we're dealing with OS versions that are EOL, it could easily be an OS version discrepancy. It's still weird to think that Win11 has been officially out for more than five years!
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By WaltC · Posted

      AI will never be the jobs panacea some companies fantasize about today. Oracle is likely using it as an excuse, which we will see a lot of companies doing, I'm certain. They love their "plausible" excuses for their downturns. A couple of weeks ago my wife asked me to call Krogers about some discrepancy in a online grocery order, and it will be the last time either of us does that. I'll just do emails with humans from now on... The AI experience was horrible--the obviously recorded voice started asking a bunch of questions about our orders six months prior(!) and saying, "Is this in reference to your order on January 6, for $****?" You say "No!" and immediately the next question is "Is this in reference to your order on January 29th, for $****?" again, I answered "No!"--and it was incredible--on and on it went like that for fully 20 minutes until we finally got to the present, and only then was I put through to a human with authentic intelligence... I wondered why on Earth the idiot AI didn't start with the most recent orders and work back from there, as it was something anyone with a functioning brain would have done. And why didn't the AI have enough sense to ask me what the problem was in the first place? It didn't take too much deduction to understand that the goal of this "AI" was to cause the person on the phone to hang up in disgust, with no resolution of the problem. That begs another question: why pay for a tool-free problem line if the goal is to avoid solving your customer's problems?... Fortunately, Krogers does have real humans capable of reading an email and understanding it, and if she sees another situation in the future that's route she or I will take. The online grocery delivery service from Krogers has been great, over all, but their AI truly sucks.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By +DDG3595 · Posted

      AI is the justification that company administrators use to lay people off; it is not the end all, be all touted in the media (many of whom can't tell a microchip from a potato chip). Greed is main driving factor behind its adoption; the other is remaining relevant in the face of competition from other entities.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By PsYcHoKiLLa · Posted

    • Firefox 152.0.2 is out with fixes for performance, translation, and cloud storage services

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Firefox 152.0.2 is out with fixes for performance, translation, and cloud storage services by Taras Buria A new bug-fixing update is now rolling out to Firefox users in the Release Channel. Less than a week ago, Mozilla fixed crashes on Intel Raptor Lake processors with version 152.0.1. Now, Mozilla has prepared yet another set of fixes that address problems with localization, playback issues of certain MP4 files, and performance issues on website that perform various encryption operations at once. Here is the full changelog: Firefox 152.0.2 is now available for download from Mozilla's FTP. Existing installations will get the update over the next several hours. The latest version will also be available soon on the official website, the Microsoft Store, and Neowin's Software page. You can find Firefox 152.0.2 release notes in the official documentation. In case you missed it, Mozilla released Firefox 152 earlier this month. The latest feature update brought reworked settings with a more streamlined user interface, JPEG XL support, new features for Private mode, a new way to mute a tab (just type "mute" in the address bar), and many more. You can find the complete changelog here. In other Firefox news, Mozilla recently published its roadmap, where the company detailed the upcoming Nova redesign and other features it plans to implement. Mozilla wants to make the new user interface easier to navigate and more modern, with a heavy focus on its privacy tools, such as its built-in VPN. If you are curious, you can already enable the new UI as described here.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      103
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!