Recommended Posts

On 7022 (leaked) as well?!! Could this be the malicious code injection point?!?? :o

Wow neo, you sure are a ray of sunshine, aren't you?

This is the same guy that leaked 7022 and 7032. Also, 7048 was sent out to some TAP and Connect testers on Sunday, so I would have been shocked if it hadn't leaked by now. I would almost guarantee that this build is fine, and it's definitely real.

On 7022 (leaked) as well?!! Could this be the malicious code injection point?!?? :o

I have 7022 x64 installed and WEI works just fine in it. Please stop spreading rumors like this -- DiamondNRG's releases seem just fine.

how do you create an iso out of the files if you dont have the build 7000 iso? I burned the copy i downloaded and deleted it.

Get ImgBurn and select make an image file out of selected files, then select the root folder, and create it.

Hey guys, thanks for the link. However we have an update on the WEI.

http://www.digitalmeld.com/2009/03/03/wind...perience-index/

Also, build 7048 is simply a "Beta Refresh" released to Microsoft TAP members as we mentioned yesterday... we have access to TAP. So ignore the rumors. We'll have further updates today on build 7048, feel free to contact us via the site if you'd like further information regarding certain aspects of the build using our contact form. We'll respond back as soon as we can.

Hey guys, thanks for the link. However we have an update on the WEI.

http://www.digitalmeld.com/2009/03/03/wind...perience-index/

Also, build 7048 is simply a "Beta Refresh" released to Microsoft TAP members as we mentioned yesterday... we have access to TAP. So ignore the rumors. We'll have further updates today on build 7048, feel free to contact us via the site if you'd like further information regarding certain aspects of the build using our contact form. We'll respond back as soon as we can.

That's good to know that there's no problems with WEI. Thanks for that update :)

That's good to know that there's no problems with WEI. Thanks for that update :)

See, this is one thing I hate about bloggers sometimes. They post error messages and BSOD screens even when its their own fault, and then say that there could be something wrong with the release.

Still looking like a solid release. Can't wait to start using the new Aero Peek refresh.

See, this is one thing I hate about bloggers sometimes. They post error messages and BSOD screens even when its their own fault, and then say that there could be something wrong with the release.

Still looking like a solid release. Can't wait to start using the new Aero Peek refresh.

You give me hope. thank you.

See, this is one thing I hate about bloggers sometimes. They post error messages and BSOD screens even when its their own fault, and then say that there could be something wrong with the release.

Still looking like a solid release. Can't wait to start using the new Aero Peek refresh.

How was the error our fault? The error occurred at least 5 times yesterday, even after an update and several reboots. For some reason today it decided to magically work.

How was the error our fault? The error occurred at least 5 times yesterday, even after an update and several reboots. For some reason today it decided to magically work.

Can I ask if there are any performance increase?

@neo7 - Sorry for being rude with you earlier today. :) I just have a problem when people spout out when they don't have the facts. I have been guilty of that myself in the past and I'm trying to remain positive and research things before I post. Peace and happiness.

Back to the topic of this thread. The downloads are going but slow as everyone can see. I would say six hours or so, thousands will be seeding at full steam. ISO's will follow. Patience is a virtue.

Can I ask if there are any performance increase?

Yes, we do see a difference in performance. Unfortunately we didn't have time to run any benchmarks but if you look at the WEI there was a .1 increase in calculation speeds and I'd say that is accurate. Also, other than the WEI error at first we have encountered absolutely no issues or errors with build 7048 (unlike build 7000). We are in the middle of making another post that will go into further details regarding the bells and whistles... but we are loving Build 7048.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!