Ad free subscriber group to be implemented


Recommended Posts

That all eh? Always looks like I'm surrounded in gold badges. I guess those with them are also going to be the more prolific users generally.

There are currently about 240 active subscribers, that number of course changes throughout the year.

I don't know, essentially a subscriber who pays for the second tier is only paying us ?10 compensation [for the ads] because we value the enhancements of the current subscriber package at ?10 already! Blog, no flood control etc come at a cost too.

In fact I don't think we'd ever recoup the money we paid for the design work on Swift/Shift/Finity forums and blogs purely through subscriptions, as that cost us more than the annual amount of subscribers that we have (around 240 per year).

I'm aware the subscribers don't nearly cover the costs you have with the site but I still don't see the point in separating them. You could have made 5 packages ranging from $5 to $50 for example and made different badges for each but left the features the same. That way, those who wanted to pay more could do that and have something to show for it. On the other hand those who wanted to pay as little as possible while still contributing also had the option.

Is it not better to get $5 from someone who would gladly pay it who already blocks the ads anyway? You don't get any revenue from such a person, so the average amount of income per person from the ads is pretty irrelevant in this case.

20 euros per year is not much. On the other hand 20 euros can get you a game or a small app or a million other things on the internet.

I guess what I find disappointing is that you did not update the current subscribers to the new group until the end of their subscription cycle as an appreciation of their support shown so far. Personally, I don't mind the ads... but it would have been a nice gesture.

I'm aware the subscribers don't nearly cover the costs you have with the site but I still don't see the point in separating them. You could have made 5 packages ranging from $5 to $50 for example and made different badges for each but left the features the same. That way, those who wanted to pay more could do that and have something to show for it. On the other hand those who wanted to pay as little as possible while still contributing also had the option.

Is it not better to get $5 from someone who would gladly pay it who already blocks the ads anyway? You don't get any revenue from such a person, so the average amount of income per person from the ads is pretty irrelevant in this case.

20 euros per year is not much. On the other hand 20 euros can get you a game or a small app or a million other things on the internet.

I guess what I find disappointing is that you did not update the current subscribers to the new group until the end of their subscription cycle as an appreciation of their support shown so far. Personally, I don't mind the ads... but it would have been a nice gesture.

I'm not sure I understand your criticism of the new tier. It seems to me more than anything you're asking for something for nothing when nothing comes at a cost of free.

The current subscriber tier is not being phased out, from what I understand. So you're not being forced to pay more than you see is fair and has the features you care about. If you want to pay as much as possible to help NeoWin then you can always subscribe to the highest tier even if you don't are to use its features.

Your biggest criticism is the new tier will have a new badge and new "status" in the community. You're against that because you're a subscriber and believe they should see us all the same... If that is such a big issue then why do we have subscriber badges at all, in your view? We should all look the same no?

The new subscriber tier isn't any better or worse than the current offerings. The new tier is just different.

[snipped]

May I refer you to this thread?

What you think is irrelevant - the administration of the site has made it clear that mentioning ad blockers is not wanted.

Edited by John S.
May I refer you to this thread?

What you think is irrelevant - the administration of the site has made it clear that mentioning ad blockers is not wanted.

I've been searching through the rules and it isn't in there, maybe it should be to avoid any future confusion?

I'll edit my posts to abide by the rules.

I just find it amusing that people jump down my throat about the mere mention of it, when the site itself is now offering ad free membership for $$$. The majority of the surfing population probably already know of it, those that don't should be allowed to make an informed decision, not kept in the dark in hope that they will continue surfing with ads or give money to stop them thinking it's the only way.

I've edited my posts, those that have quoted me I suggest you do the same.

I just find it amusing that people jump down my throat about the mere mention of it, when the site itself is now offering ad free membership for $$$. The majority of the surfing population probably already know of it, those that don't should be allowed to make an informed decision, not kept in the dark in hope that they will continue surfing with ads or give money to stop them thinking it's the only way.
Uh huh. Neowin's TOS prohibits ad blockers, so if you don't like the ads, don't use the site. Period. If Neowin wants to offer an ad-free version for $, that is their choice/right.
I just find it amusing that people jump down my throat about the mere mention of it, when the site itself is now offering ad free membership for $$$. The majority of the surfing population probably already know of it, those that don't should be allowed to make an informed decision, not kept in the dark in hope that they will continue surfing with ads or give money to stop them thinking it's the only way.

It is your right to use said software, and it is our right to restrict discussion of it on our site.

If we don't want people discussing how to block our ads, would it not be hypocritical of us to allow you to discuss blocking ads on other sites? Because of such, we simply don't allow the discussion at all. There are plenty of places on the internet that you can do that, we are simply asking that it not be here.

Surely you wouldn't want people coming to your place of employment telling people where they can get a product your workplace offers, free of charge. If they did, I am sure they would be escorted off the premises. Why is it any different here?

In the end, you are going to do what you do, and this subscription tier probably isn't for you. As you stated, people know their options when it comes to ads, and those that subscribe to this tier will do so primarily to offer financial support for what we do here. The ads being removed will just be an added benefit.

I just find it amusing that people jump down my throat about the mere mention of it, when the site itself is now offering ad free membership for $$$. The majority of the surfing population probably already know of it, those that don't should be allowed to make an informed decision, not kept in the dark in hope that they will continue surfing with ads or give money to stop them thinking it's the only way.

I've edited my posts, those that have quoted me I suggest you do the same.

They key word is "for $$$". The ads on this site is what brings in the money. Without money neowin would not be able to operate. It pays the bills. Neowin is paying (bandwidth and such) to give you something for free. When you disable the ads on your browser they are unable to make any of that money back. By people paying them not to see ads, they are now making money regardless if you see the ads or not. That's the difference

Badass. Now I can get my even more elite status to help support my superiority complex!

Seriously though, I'll probably jump to it when it becomes available. Still no Tier 2 showing up so...

@Eric, wanna know what I find hypocritical? :shifty:

Hah, kidding. I swear, I won't bring that up again. ;)

It is your right to use said software, and it is our right to restrict discussion of it on our site.

If we don't want people discussing how to block our ads, would it not be hypocritical of us to allow you to discuss blocking ads on other sites? Because of such, we simply don't allow the discussion at all. There are plenty of places on the internet that you can do that, we are simply asking that it not be here.

Surely you wouldn't want people coming to your place of employment telling people where they can get a product your workplace offers, free of charge. If they did, I am sure they would be escorted off the premises. Why is it any different here?

In the end, you are going to do what you do, and this subscription tier probably isn't for you. As you stated, people know their options when it comes to ads, and those that subscribe to this tier will do so primarily to offer financial support for what we do here. The ads being removed will just be an added benefit.

ETA on Tier 2? :p

Finity is confirmed as working with the ad free modification, I hope tomorrow the rest of the themes are done too and then we can enable it :)

Awesome stuff Neobond! :)

@bangbang :laugh:

I'm not sure I understand your criticism of the new tier. It seems to me more than anything you're asking for something for nothing when nothing comes at a cost of free.

The current subscriber tier is not being phased out, from what I understand. So you're not being forced to pay more than you see is fair and has the features you care about. If you want to pay as much as possible to help NeoWin then you can always subscribe to the highest tier even if you don't are to use its features.

Your biggest criticism is the new tier will have a new badge and new "status" in the community. You're against that because you're a subscriber and believe they should see us all the same... If that is such a big issue then why do we have subscriber badges at all, in your view? We should all look the same no?

The new subscriber tier isn't any better or worse than the current offerings. The new tier is just different.

I don't care about the badges and how we look. It is my opinion that they should have done the same features (adfree, no post timer, blog etc) for all subscriber tiers rather than just the most expensive one. That way you'd give an incentive to those who block the ads anyway to pay at least the smallest amount to contribute something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!