Recommended Posts

pharaohes is language are extinct.

Arabic is there Local language

the pic is just a joke

It is a joke, but the language is Arabic. The ancient written form of the Arabic language, Hieroglyphics (which is what that is), is dead. The language itself is alive and well.

....

It is a joke, but the language is Arabic. The ancient written form of the Arabic language, Hieroglyphics (which is what that is), is dead. The language itself is alive and well.

1) Hieroglyphs ARE NOT the ancient form of the Arabic language :p Hieroglyphs are ideograms (!= alphabet) used by ancient Egyptians while Arabic is a semitic alphabetical script derived from the Aramaic Nabataean alphabet which has nothing to do with Ancient Egypt.

2) Modern Egypt uses the Arabic alphabet along with a dialect of the Arabic language.

3) In the previous screenshot the user obviously changed the font to some Hieroglyphs font

1) Hieroglyphs ARE NOT the ancient form of the Arabic language :p Hieroglyphs are ideograms (!= alphabet) used by ancient Egyptians while Arabic is a semitic alphabetical script derived from the Aramaic Nabataean alphabet which has nothing to do with Ancient Egypt.

2) Modern Egypt uses the Arabic alphabet along with a dialect of the Arabic language.

3) In the previous screenshot the user obviously changed the font to some Hieroglyphs font

Agreed on all three points. Though a bit of clarification, "Hieroglyphs are ideograms (!= alphabet) used by ancient Egyptians". This is 100% true. Though they spoke Arabic primarily and earlier, Aramaic. Which was my point. I just didn't structure my response properly, I suppose.

Agreed on all three points. Though a bit of clarification, "Hieroglyphs are ideograms (!= alphabet) used by ancient Egyptians". This is 100% true. Though they spoke Arabic primarily and earlier, Aramaic. Which was my point. I just didn't structure my response properly, I suppose.

Lol at all these 'Windows 7' threads.

Agreed on all three points. Though a bit of clarification, "Hieroglyphs are ideograms (!= alphabet) used by ancient Egyptians". This is 100% true. Though they spoke Arabic primarily and earlier, Aramaic.

The ancient egyptians? No they didn't. :p

What wallpaper is that?

http://www.thevista.ru/files/images/gallery/7106/04.jpg

and... why does the date say 12.4.09? lolol

Look at the figures on the bridge pillars, it's from somewhere in China.

Seems like there's another non english leak. I had this screenshot from a friend of mine from Egypt.

I think I'm gonna try this one, this language is more intuitive than chinese.

Hieroglyphs? Most absurd fake I've seen so far :rofl:

Egyptians use Egyptian Arabic.

Anyway, I'll try the x64 one as a separate install. Let's see if my Japanese helps me decode it :laugh:

Wow no English language pack yet? Sigh...

You could give this a shot... Softpedia download. This is for beta, but I am sure they are fully compatible for RC as well.

I don't see the point in going through all the hassle of installing a language pack when the English 7106 leak should be out within the next two days. It is worth the wait by all means.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!