Windows 7 Build 7100 RC (Changes/Bugs/Tweaks) Discussion


Recommended Posts

I don't think this is a bug. If your checking the box that says you do not want windows to remember your password, then why would you want it to remember the password for the current site? If you click No then the box shouldn't come up again and offer to remember passwords of any sites.

Ticking the box stops the dialog from appearing every time you log into a website for the first time. It doesn't stop IE from remembering the log in details you enter unless you clicked No in the dialog box.

The text next to the box is the same as "Don't show this dialog box again".

Edited by lee26

Could someone please explain, what's up with saving network passwords in 7?

In XP, when i access some network resource (\\server for example) i get a prompt with username and password and an option to remember this. And thats it. XP remembers it, and never asks it again.

Now with Vista, there was also a checkbox for saving credentials, but... it never worked. After logoff, the password prompt was back. So the way to fix this, was to use "control userpasswords2" and just save the machine/username/password manually. It worked!

In 7 we now have this new Windows Vault, and i just can't get it to work, as i want.

I can see my saved credentials, but after logoff it remembers the username, but always asks the password.

I have tried to add the creds. manually or checked the 'remember' box, but for some reason it never remembers the passwords.

Further more - for rdp connections it seems to remember nothing. Even the username will be blank when connecting. In the mean time- Windows Vault happily shows me the saved TERMSRV entries and RDP window says "Saved credentials will be used..." But..its..just..not..working.

Any thoughts on whats going on here?

I did a clean install of 7100 x64 last night and I'm pretty impressed with it so far. Performance is improved from what I can tell. 7077 was already a fast and relatively stable build but 7100 feels even more stable and a bit faster than 7077. 7100 no longer asks me to reboot after connecting additional SATA after a fresh install. In 7077 I had to reboot after connecting my 2nd SATA drive after a format. Avast updates manually now which was sort of broken for me in all the past builds. The most dramatic change for me was GTA IV on 7100. It runs so much smoother on 7100 than it did on any of the past builds. I used to get the odd micro stutter in 7077 and those little hiccups are gone in 7100.

i have build 7000 installed. should i install rc? are there major performance improvement between two builds?

If you are still using 7000, upgrading to 7100 is a must. Performance-wise, "major" improvement is an understatement. There is an enormous difference and the build is much more stable.

I am having a fit deciding whether to drop my new 7100 dvd burn in there or not. I know the official RC is near and I can't decide if its worth it, lol. Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

running 7077 x86 btw, lol

apologies if somebody mentioned this already. I did a clean install of 64bit and I can't install either the 9-3 or 9-4 ATI win7 64bit drivers. I had no problems under 7077 64bit. As soon as the installation starts searching for old and installing the new drivers it BSODs. The native MS drivers seem to be updated and fine, so it's not a very big deal. My gfx card is a ATI HD 3870 500Mb. it bsods with a plug and play error...

hopefully this will go away soon

edit1: and it went away soon, hehe. I previously tried to install the suite. This time I downloaded the driver package only and it worked - go figure.

edit 2: was able to install ccc as well without problems. 9-4 control center did not work for under 7077, seems to be fixed with 7100.

Edited by DerAusgewanderte
I am having a fit deciding whether to drop my new 7100 dvd burn in there or not. I know the official RC is near and I can't decide if its worth it, lol. Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

running 7077 x86 btw, lol

I would say unlikely. First of all, they've said that the build number 7100 is reserved for the RC. Second, this build has the shorter build string, just like the beta so it is indeed intended for public release (if not, it's very close). The only exception I can think of is if they decide to recompile it without changing the build number (like they can do for public releases). However from what I've read, this build was already sent out to TAP etc. so I would say that's also a strong indication that it's legit. :)
Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

No chance IMO. I also waited for the official beta first time around and it was pointless and you'd save yourself the hassle on hoping MS doesn't have any server issues when they open their pipes.

I have an old program that opens a DOS like window as it checks for updates before it launches itself

It worked in 7077, does not work at all in 7100... Compatibility mode doesn't help at all... Disappointing and frustrating

Also, 7100 overall is running slower for me

64 bit user here

Edit: Still seems "slow", but my program seems to be working... the installation for the program appears to have been ****ed up, so that's good that I can hopefully get it working

I assume Windows 7 has to do all its indexing and stuff like that before my computer starts feeling as fast as it did with 7077

Edited by Deathray

Finally got Windows 7 RC up and running. Everything works great, however, when I try to play a .mov file in Windows Media Player it gives me a C00D11B1 "Windows Media Player encountered a problem trying to play this file." Does anyone else get this?

I can't play any mkv files, the video stops and media player dies after 2 sec . I installed only the mkv specific codecs with K lite codec pack. Any idea or codec pack recommendation ?

Uninstall all codec packs and just install haali media splitter. All the ncessary codecs are in win7 by default. Although u might want to install ac3filter as well since it has dts audio codec which win7 does not.

Finally got Windows 7 RC up and running. Everything works great, however, when I try to play a .mov file in Windows Media Player it gives me a C00D11B1 "Windows Media Player encountered a problem trying to play this file." Does anyone else get this?

Depends on what's inside. If it's H.264 + AAC, it should work fine. If has SVQ3 or something, then it won't work out of the box.

WOW .. less than 20 minutes install (from the moment i click on Clean Install to the first screen of the desktop) from my POS Laptop (1.6ghz Dual Core P4 with a 120gig 5400RPM Drive) from a HDD USB install (i always do that). This is the fastest W7 install on my machine so far..

Uninstall all codec packs and just install haali media splitter. All the ncessary codecs are in win7 by default. Although u might want to install ac3filter as well since it has dts audio codec which win7 does not.

Still dies. I'll install VLC.

I always figured the checkbox meant you don't want it to remember passwords at all, but it seems they changed the wording. I didn't notice.

This is why I like Firefox better.

I have one important question. Will Thinstalled/Thinapped programs run in this build? I really depend on portable apps. Right now Thinstall/Thinapp incompatibility and the WiFi bugs are the only things keeping me from using Windows 7 as my main OS instead of Vista.

Played around a bit more with network passwords and actually found smth interesting: network passwords will only be remembered, if the target machine is accessed by ip adress. If i save the creds. by machine name, its password will be lost after logoff. Weid stuff...

Also, in credential manager, there's a new line called Persistence. It's Enterprise for my networked XP machines, but Home Server will be saved as Logon Session (and the creds. will then be lost after logoff) Manual entry gives me Enterprise and works ok.

This Credential Manager is confusing as hell...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!