Windows 7 Build 7100 RC (Changes/Bugs/Tweaks) Discussion


Recommended Posts

Has anyone done an UPGRADE install from Build 7000 (Beta) or from at least a build earlier than 7077 and would like to comment on how that went? I am considering the upgrade to RC from Beta (I plan on doing a clean install when the final version comes out) :D

im disappointed.. its a bug or either its intended...

when i delete sumthing.. it parmanently deletes it ... AS IN .. dun put it in recycle bin unless i drag it to the Bin..

??? WAT SAY??

That doesn't happen with me. Make sure it's set to send files to the recycle bin and just not delete them outright.

ill be disappointed if the Released RC HAS THE BETA **** WALL!!! :(

Microsoft is doing well for the code i knw... but they are a little bak in the graphics department...

there are many small UI flaws..

Don't dis Bettas... Betta fish rock!!!

Well dont really notice any change at all from 7077.

My damn laptop display still wont go to sleep!

Using an NVidia Quadro NVS140M on a Dell Latitude D830 and I guess MS made some change in 7077 that broke the drivers or something.

The whole system still goes to sleep just fine if I hit the power button but nothing goes to sleep anymore based on the Windows Control Panel settings.. Worked just fine in every build previous to 7077!

The superbar/taksbar/wtf ever its called, lol......still has the damn blur when you place it at the top of the screen. Not an issue at the bottom. You have to be chittin me, not one single tester at ms likes the superbar at the top? really? you serious? lol

I had it too. Downloded the NVIDIA drivers from Windows Update. Restarted and it has gone.

P.S I never understood why the taskbar is not at the top by default. Most program options are at the top...

Now that I've gotten to play around with the RC for a bit. Here are my thoughts on it:

All I have to say is: WOW!

Gone are the bugs I had in the beta. Gone are any program incompatibilities I had. The install time was roughly 15 minutes from start to finish. The UI is faster than the beta, and the new tweaks and features are simply amazing! I threw pretty much everything I had at the RC, and it still boots faster and is more snappier than my XP installation. Vista may of been bad, but Windows 7 took everything that was bad about Vista, threw it out, took the good stuff, and amplified it.

This doesn't scream "Release Candidate" to me at all. It screams "Done!". This is simply the best Windows release yet!

Edited by Kevin.
Now that I've gotten to play around with the RC for a bit. Here are my thoughts on it:

All I have to say is: WOW!

Gone are the bugs I had in the beta. Gone are any program incompatibilities I had. The install time was roughly 15 minutes from start to finish. The UI is faster than the beta, and the new tweaks and features are simply amazing! I threw pretty much everything I had at the RC, and it still boots faster and is more snappier than my XP installation. Vista may of been bad, but Windows 7 took anything that was bad about Vista, threw it out, took the good stuff, and amplified it.

This doesn't scream "Release Candidate" to me at all. It screams "Done!". This is simply the best Windows release yet!

Thank you Kevin for giving your honest opinion. Personally I am waiting for the official release, but it does sound very promising.

This doesn't scream "Release Candidate" to me at all. It screams "Done!". This is simply the best Windows release yet!

To be fair that is the definition of what a release candidate should be. :p If there's no blocking bugs then any RC should be considered able to become the RTM build.

Now that I've gotten to play around with the RC for a bit. Here are my thoughts on it:

All I have to say is: WOW!

Gone are the bugs I had in the beta. Gone are any program incompatibilities I had. The install time was roughly 15 minutes from start to finish. The UI is faster than the beta, and the new tweaks and features are simply amazing! I threw pretty much everything I had at the RC, and it still boots faster and is more snappier than my XP installation. Vista may of been bad, but Windows 7 took anything that was bad about Vista, threw it out, took the good stuff, and amplified it.

This doesn't scream "Release Candidate" to me at all. It screams "Done!". This is simply the best Windows release yet!

Fantastic. I may well install it when it is officially released. I can't believe they have stopped us from upgrading from the beta; I just hope Microsoft's work-around is safe seeing as they don't recommend it :/

Fantastic. I may well install it when it is officially released. I can't believe they have stopped us from upgrading from the beta; I just hope Microsoft's work-around is safe seeing as they don't recommend it :/

I wouldn't recommend it either. A clean install ensures that nothing bad can carry over during an upgrade process since you're starting from scratch.

I can confirm that my laptop now properly goes to sleep and that I don't get this weird "fade" effect when I shut down like I did in the beta.

I just timed my boot and it took around 2 minutes from initial BIOS output to usable desktop. Only took maybe 15-20 seconds to get through the BIOS (to the point of "Windows is loading" or whatever).

Any way to monitor your bootup sequence and check what exactly is causing your computer to take so long to boot up? I just installed Windows 7 yesterday and have all my main programs installed on it. One thing I noticed is I didnt need to install any drivers except my video card, does windows 7 already have all my up-to-date chipset drivers or could that be a reason my boot is so slow? 1:30 on a fresh install is pretty slow, slower than Vista even (it takes about as long to boot as my Vista partition does, and that has been installed for over a year).

I wouldn't upgrade if I had the time to do a clean install :D

Yet you have the time to be a moderator? Clean install is important. Takes me like half an hour to re-install stuff after a reinstall. I have everything stored on a second drive.

Yet you have the time to be a moderator? Clean install is important. Takes me like half an hour to re-install stuff after a reinstall. I have everything stored on a second drive.

Being a moderator does contribute to my lack of time, along with university work and my part-time job; especially when I have exams and many assignments, like I do now.

Currently, I am happy with that balance and the little free time I currently have. Doing a clean install wouldn't be feasible for me as I would have to get hold of the many different programs I have installed. Also as a programmer, studying many different languages, I would also have to download and configure every IDE I use, setting the path variables, syntax colour, etc - all of that takes a fair bit of time in itself.

Copying over all of my music, videos, pictures and projects takes up a considerable amount of time too.

What about my Firefox installation? Is there an easy way to back-up my profile so all of the extensions and themes I have are still in tact as well as my bookmarks and all of their tags? The bookmarks and tags are vital and I can't lose them.

What about my copy of Microsoft Office 2007 Home and Student? It says I am only able to use the license key 3 times. I'm unsure what would happen if I clean-installed the Windows 7 release candidate and tried to install my copy of Office again? I don't think I should risk trying that at least until university is over for this year.

Yes, a clean install is important, but not that important to me when I'm going to be clean-installing once the RTM version is released.

If you or anybody else could tell me of a much easier way for me to back-up my programs and configurations, for every program I use, then I may re-consider :)

Yet you have the time to be a moderator? Clean install is important. Takes me like half an hour to re-install stuff after a reinstall. I have everything stored on a second drive.

+1

all in a store drive...then +- 2 hours to get system fully functional

What about my Firefox installation? Is there an easy way to back-up my profile so all of the extensions and themes I have are still in tact as well as my bookmarks and all of their tags? The bookmarks and tags are vital and I can't lose them.

Yes, you can backup your entire profile. Go to the start menu and type %appdata% into the search box, hit enter. Simply make a backup copy of the Mozilla folder. When you install Firefox again, replace the existing version (if there is one) with the backup. Simple as that. Great way to sync your settings, customizations, and addons across multiple computers.

Yet you have the time to be a moderator? Clean install is important. Takes me like half an hour to re-install stuff after a reinstall. I have everything stored on a second drive.

It takes me about an hour or two to get my core programs reinstalled (programs I cant use my computer without).

After that it takes me a few days to get everything re-configured to my liking (program settings, themes, etc), including the small apps I dont need, but like to have.

Overall a clean install takes awhile, it takes time to get all your programs reinstalled but it takes even more time to get your computer working how you want it.....but in the end it is totally worth it.

Hey Calum be sure to let us know how the upgrade goes if you do end up performing it :)

I will do :) It may be risky, but we'll see :)

+1

all in a store drive...then +- 2 hours to get system fully functional

Are you able to backup programs and configurations of these programs this way? If so, may you please let me know how you do this? :) As far as I am aware (and I am quite naive with this side of things) I thought you could only really backup the setup files of programs?

Yes, you can backup your entire profile. Go to the start menu and type %appdata% into the search box, hit enter. Simply make a backup copy of the Mozilla folder. When you install Firefox again, replace the existing version (if there is one) with the backup. Simple as that. Great way to sync your settings, customizations, and addons across multiple computers.

Brilliant! :) I didn't know it was that simple :D Thank you.

Hey Calum be sure to let us know how the upgrade goes if you do end up performing it :)

I know you seem eager to find out how the upgrade from 7000 to 7100 works. Why not just create a backup image of your current 7000 and give it a shot? If it does not go as smoothly, you can always restore to the backup image.

The biggest downside to the upgrade for the one time I chose to use it from 7048 to 7057 was it takes at least an hour to fully install the new system files and then transfer all the previous files into their proper directories. With that time, I am just better off doing a clean install since its faster.

Yes, a clean install is important, but not that important to me when I'm going to be clean-installing once the RTM version is released.

If you or anybody else could tell me of a much easier way for me to back-up my programs and configurations, for every program I use, then I may re-consider :)

I keep all setup files in an install folder ready to go. Followed by that all music/pictures/data is on a second drive.

I have Mesh, keeping a online backup of data as well that is stored on drive c. (Such as Mozilla profile directory, Foobar config directory etc.)

I also use Office 2007 Student edition and have installed it 20+ times.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!