Windows 7 Build 7100 RC (Changes/Bugs/Tweaks) Discussion


Recommended Posts

I don't think this is a bug. If your checking the box that says you do not want windows to remember your password, then why would you want it to remember the password for the current site? If you click No then the box shouldn't come up again and offer to remember passwords of any sites.

Ticking the box stops the dialog from appearing every time you log into a website for the first time. It doesn't stop IE from remembering the log in details you enter unless you clicked No in the dialog box.

The text next to the box is the same as "Don't show this dialog box again".

Edited by lee26

Could someone please explain, what's up with saving network passwords in 7?

In XP, when i access some network resource (\\server for example) i get a prompt with username and password and an option to remember this. And thats it. XP remembers it, and never asks it again.

Now with Vista, there was also a checkbox for saving credentials, but... it never worked. After logoff, the password prompt was back. So the way to fix this, was to use "control userpasswords2" and just save the machine/username/password manually. It worked!

In 7 we now have this new Windows Vault, and i just can't get it to work, as i want.

I can see my saved credentials, but after logoff it remembers the username, but always asks the password.

I have tried to add the creds. manually or checked the 'remember' box, but for some reason it never remembers the passwords.

Further more - for rdp connections it seems to remember nothing. Even the username will be blank when connecting. In the mean time- Windows Vault happily shows me the saved TERMSRV entries and RDP window says "Saved credentials will be used..." But..its..just..not..working.

Any thoughts on whats going on here?

I did a clean install of 7100 x64 last night and I'm pretty impressed with it so far. Performance is improved from what I can tell. 7077 was already a fast and relatively stable build but 7100 feels even more stable and a bit faster than 7077. 7100 no longer asks me to reboot after connecting additional SATA after a fresh install. In 7077 I had to reboot after connecting my 2nd SATA drive after a format. Avast updates manually now which was sort of broken for me in all the past builds. The most dramatic change for me was GTA IV on 7100. It runs so much smoother on 7100 than it did on any of the past builds. I used to get the odd micro stutter in 7077 and those little hiccups are gone in 7100.

i have build 7000 installed. should i install rc? are there major performance improvement between two builds?

If you are still using 7000, upgrading to 7100 is a must. Performance-wise, "major" improvement is an understatement. There is an enormous difference and the build is much more stable.

I am having a fit deciding whether to drop my new 7100 dvd burn in there or not. I know the official RC is near and I can't decide if its worth it, lol. Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

running 7077 x86 btw, lol

apologies if somebody mentioned this already. I did a clean install of 64bit and I can't install either the 9-3 or 9-4 ATI win7 64bit drivers. I had no problems under 7077 64bit. As soon as the installation starts searching for old and installing the new drivers it BSODs. The native MS drivers seem to be updated and fine, so it's not a very big deal. My gfx card is a ATI HD 3870 500Mb. it bsods with a plug and play error...

hopefully this will go away soon

edit1: and it went away soon, hehe. I previously tried to install the suite. This time I downloaded the driver package only and it worked - go figure.

edit 2: was able to install ccc as well without problems. 9-4 control center did not work for under 7077, seems to be fixed with 7100.

Edited by DerAusgewanderte
I am having a fit deciding whether to drop my new 7100 dvd burn in there or not. I know the official RC is near and I can't decide if its worth it, lol. Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

running 7077 x86 btw, lol

I would say unlikely. First of all, they've said that the build number 7100 is reserved for the RC. Second, this build has the shorter build string, just like the beta so it is indeed intended for public release (if not, it's very close). The only exception I can think of is if they decide to recompile it without changing the build number (like they can do for public releases). However from what I've read, this build was already sent out to TAP etc. so I would say that's also a strong indication that it's legit. :)
Is there any chance the official RC will be a different version from 7100?

No chance IMO. I also waited for the official beta first time around and it was pointless and you'd save yourself the hassle on hoping MS doesn't have any server issues when they open their pipes.

I have an old program that opens a DOS like window as it checks for updates before it launches itself

It worked in 7077, does not work at all in 7100... Compatibility mode doesn't help at all... Disappointing and frustrating

Also, 7100 overall is running slower for me

64 bit user here

Edit: Still seems "slow", but my program seems to be working... the installation for the program appears to have been ****ed up, so that's good that I can hopefully get it working

I assume Windows 7 has to do all its indexing and stuff like that before my computer starts feeling as fast as it did with 7077

Edited by Deathray

Finally got Windows 7 RC up and running. Everything works great, however, when I try to play a .mov file in Windows Media Player it gives me a C00D11B1 "Windows Media Player encountered a problem trying to play this file." Does anyone else get this?

I can't play any mkv files, the video stops and media player dies after 2 sec . I installed only the mkv specific codecs with K lite codec pack. Any idea or codec pack recommendation ?

Uninstall all codec packs and just install haali media splitter. All the ncessary codecs are in win7 by default. Although u might want to install ac3filter as well since it has dts audio codec which win7 does not.

Finally got Windows 7 RC up and running. Everything works great, however, when I try to play a .mov file in Windows Media Player it gives me a C00D11B1 "Windows Media Player encountered a problem trying to play this file." Does anyone else get this?

Depends on what's inside. If it's H.264 + AAC, it should work fine. If has SVQ3 or something, then it won't work out of the box.

WOW .. less than 20 minutes install (from the moment i click on Clean Install to the first screen of the desktop) from my POS Laptop (1.6ghz Dual Core P4 with a 120gig 5400RPM Drive) from a HDD USB install (i always do that). This is the fastest W7 install on my machine so far..

Uninstall all codec packs and just install haali media splitter. All the ncessary codecs are in win7 by default. Although u might want to install ac3filter as well since it has dts audio codec which win7 does not.

Still dies. I'll install VLC.

I always figured the checkbox meant you don't want it to remember passwords at all, but it seems they changed the wording. I didn't notice.

This is why I like Firefox better.

I have one important question. Will Thinstalled/Thinapped programs run in this build? I really depend on portable apps. Right now Thinstall/Thinapp incompatibility and the WiFi bugs are the only things keeping me from using Windows 7 as my main OS instead of Vista.

Played around a bit more with network passwords and actually found smth interesting: network passwords will only be remembered, if the target machine is accessed by ip adress. If i save the creds. by machine name, its password will be lost after logoff. Weid stuff...

Also, in credential manager, there's a new line called Persistence. It's Enterprise for my networked XP machines, but Home Server will be saved as Logon Session (and the creds. will then be lost after logoff) Manual entry gives me Enterprise and works ok.

This Credential Manager is confusing as hell...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!