Recommended Posts

It seems Sinofsky said a while ago "second half of August". I could have sworn...

Why does it matter whether it's the same as WZOR? The RTM build number is well-known by now, if you are that interested, do some research. Considering everyone here is getting it from Technet/MSDN, why would anyone care?

It seems Sinofsky said a while ago "second half of August". I could have sworn...

Why does it matter whether it's the same as WZOR? The RTM build number is well-known by now, if you are that interested, do some research. Considering everyone here is getting it from Technet/MSDN, why would anyone care?

More than likely the downloaded from "those other sources" rather than waiting.

That I recalled reading too.

The Technet Plus blog has been updated with the announcement:

Release Waves

893 different images are being released to TechNet Plus Subscriber Downloads in 3 waves:

? Wave 1 (August 6th): >

o All Windows 7 Client (x86 and x64) Retail and VL Editions ? English only

o Language packs, WAIKs, WDKs, SDKs, and Symbols ? in all available languages

? Wave 2 (August 14th):):

o Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter, Web, Itanium (x64 and ia64) ? English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese

o All Windows 7 Client (x86 and x64) Retail and VL Editions ? French, German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese

o Checked builds ? EnglishWave 3 (August 21st):st 21st):

o Remaining Windows 7 Client and Windows Server 2008 R2 Editions in the following languages, released as they become available (likely order) ? Dutch, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Brazilian, Polish, Korean, Traditional Chinese (Taiwan), Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong ? SAR), Turkish, Czech, Portuguese, Hungarian, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Arabic, Hebrew, Greek, Ukrainian, Thai, Romanian, Lithuanian, Slovak, Bulgarian, Estonian, Croatian, Serbian Latin, Latvian, Slovenian

o Windows 7 Starter Edition ? All languages

Looks like Server 2008 R2 will be August 14th.

I did some testing and found out that downloading using the Akamai download manager is the fastest.

So I am wondering which one you all are using to download?

Here's a poll:

Poll: What download manager are you using?

[*]Microsoft File Transfer Manager

[*]Akamai Download Manager

[*]Plain old HTTP browser download

[*]Other download manager

Current poll results:

results.cgi?pid=340567&layout=1&sort=prc.png

I wonder if Microsoft have eve considered utilising bitTorrent for such a monumental release... it would have actually worked into everyone's favor including themselves... sigh.

Bittorent isn't an option probably because theres no way they can limit or track whose getting the file once the tracker and link is made public.

More than likely the downloaded from "those other sources" rather than waiting.

That's fine if that's their bag, but could they not check the build number for themselves? I would not have assumed that a bunch of people with Technet accounts would be pulling the "RTM" build from wz0r rather than waiting a few days to get it legally.

That's fine if that's their bag, but could they not check the build number for themselves? I would not have assumed that a bunch of people with Technet accounts would be pulling the "RTM" build from wz0r rather than waiting a few days to get it legally.

Apparently, some people did. Since it's confirmed that the leaked build would be the same with the RTM build. Therefore they decided to download at the time, and grab the product key when it comes out.

Well for all those wondering I downloaded the x64 Ultimate ISO and installed it on a fresh disk. The license agreement that came up said Windows 7 Ultimate and there was nowhere to change versions during the initial install. After the install was complete and during 1st boot it asked for a key I tried putting in a Home Premium key and it said that it was the wrong key for the SKU installed. Put in an Ultimate key and no problem. So there ya go.. that was my experience anyway.

You all definitely should try the Akamai download manager! On my own connection, download speed was around 100 KB/s using FTM. When I started using Akamai, I got 850 KB/s!

You can use Akamai by navigating to "Top Downloads" and using those links (IE required) instead of the normal "Downloads" webpage on TechNet.

I don't know if some of you guys have noticed this but there are actually (2) distinct places to download the Windows 7 RTM from on both MSDn and Technet.

from the regular download link (from Microsoft) and from the top downloads section (From Akaimai global CDN).

The Akaimai way should be faster for most people. If you are getting low speeds you should really try the Akamai side. Much faster.

50-200KB from MS since the load has kicked in vs 2MBps from akamai.

Well for all those wondering I downloaded the x64 Ultimate ISO and installed it on a fresh disk. The license agreement that came up said Windows 7 Ultimate and there was nowhere to change versions during the initial install. After the install was complete and during 1st boot it asked for a key I tried putting in a Home Premium key and it said that it was the wrong key for the SKU installed. Put in an Ultimate key and no problem. So there ya go.. that was my experience anyway.

That would make sense. You'd have to change the file (ei.cfg was it?) to be able to change the "edition" of the Iso. I think it's that file that dictates the edition of that iso.

So us volume license sa users get it tomorrow right ?

Yes

I don't know if some of you guys have noticed this but there are actually (2) distinct places to download the Windows 7 RTM from on both MSDn and Technet.

from the regular download link (from Microsoft) and from the top downloads section (From Akaimai global CDN).

The Akaimai way should be faster for most people. If you are getting low speeds you should really try the Akamai side. Much faster.

50-200KB from MS since the load has kicked in vs 2MBps from akamai.

Hey! I said that already in the post above you :p .

So, it seems while it should be entirely possible to Install ANY version of the RTM from any of the CDs it seems that each individual DVD that is up on TechNet/MSDN have been modified to only accept the respective version keys. I just realized this now upon getting one of the isos downloaded. Trying to activate with a different version's key than the labeled name fails.

Just a heads up. My original theory was wrong. The sizes are the same but they are in fact different.

You all definitely should try the Akamai download manager! On my own connection, download speed was around 100 KB/s using FTM. When I started using Akamai, I got 850 KB/s!

You can use Akamai by navigating to "Top Downloads" and using those links (IE required) instead of the normal "Downloads" webpage on TechNet.

Perfect Thanks! I was wondering where the download manager went to and then I realized I was in FF.

Apparently, some people did. Since it's confirmed that the leaked build would be the same with the RTM build. Therefore they decided to download at the time, and grab the product key when it comes out.

Yeah, like I said, it's cool and, whatever, but why ask whether the build number is the same? The build number for the technet download is (gasp) the same build number that went gold last month.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!